Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a 1992 RB20DET from a 1992 R-32, no mods that could effect boost - we made a custom intake manifold, but that was strictly for cosmetic reasons. The wastegate controller does not appear to have been tampered with. It goes right up to 11 pounds boost, but never over that.

1. What is the normal max boost pressure on this engine when completely stock?

2. What is the rated horsepower, and at what boost pressure is it measured?

I have done quite a bit of searching, can't find the answer these seemingly simple questions. Anyone here know the answers?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428395-rb20-boost-pressure/
Share on other sites

I'm not 100% sure, but from what I know, and I'm sure someone else can confirm for me, the stock RB20 wastegate actuator is 10psi and the power an rb20det makes from factory is about 165kw at the flywheel I think?

 

My stock HCR32 (auto) was on the dyno recently, 117Kw atw, 10psi tapering down to7.5

 

Wow. That's awful. When I tuned mine, it was an auto ECU but had been converted to a manual box years before. Running 14 psi on the factory tune it did ~150 rwkW (and the dyno is a pretty good one, certainly comparable to most other DDs). Boost would hold up pretty well at high revs. After the ECU was tuned and with boost turned down a little (12-13 psi) because we were at max in a few areas, it was more like 170rwkW.

The only other mods on the car were full exhaust, FMIC and metal turbo inlet.

awful????? going by this converter http://www.mk5cortinaestate.co.uk/calculator4.php and wiki I'm down 12 HP from new :ermm:

anyways 3" turbo back goes on this weekend weather permitting and the following weekend new EV14 injectors then I'm off to the drags

Yuh, awful. Even before I put a boost controller onto my RB20 it would pretty much hold 10 psi up to high revs, and that is where most of your low reading is coming from (assuming no low reading dyno). 7.5 psi boost is soft compared to 10. And as you can see from my report above....14psi makes it a completely different thing. 150rwkW feels drastically different to 117.

Still think you're being a little harsh, 12hp below new running stock everything accept a fuel pump, the only possible issue is a slight exhaust gasket leak which will get confirmed when I put my 3" exhaust in. You don't know your compression test readings for those dyno figures? When I put my injectors in I'll do a compression test.

Thanks for the replies - that takes away the mystery somewhat. I have owned a lot of cars, but this is my first experience with a turbo. As I stated before, the purpose of the custom intake was purely cosmetic - to get rid of all the clutter on top of the motor. I already described this here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/428272-not-living-in-oz-but-one-of-the-other-colonies/

post-115519-0-85626500-1373481893_thumb.jpg

Edited by stilettoman

R33's and 34's were 7.

Yuh, awful. Even before I put a boost controller onto my RB20 it would pretty much hold 10 psi up to high revs, and that is where most of your low reading is coming from (assuming no low reading dyno). 7.5 psi boost is soft compared to 10. And as you can see from my report above....14psi makes it a completely different thing. 150rwkW feels drastically different to 117.

Stock exhaust will probably be the culprit of this. Almost everyone makes 10-11 PSI for the full range with their R32 because almost everyone has a aftermarket exhaust. The dyno wasn't particularly low reading as far as i know, 3 r33's on the day all made within 1-2kw's of 180 with only an exhaust and a front mount, and my tuned r32 with 33 turbo mad 170kw's.

Dam 33's.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...