Jump to content
SAU Community

My Rb26Dett Build 650 To 700Hp 9000Rpms


Recommended Posts

Nah. 150hp shot of NOS. It'd be easy.

You can probably get a package deal for some NOS and stage 2 cams.

Good times.

Nah. 150hp shot of NOS. It'd be easy.

You can probably get a package deal for some NOS and stage 2 cams.

Good times.

yeah i have a NOS kit on a shelf in my shop but im over NOS iv had it in like 3 or 4 cars i just want the power all the time no bottles to fill ill be running methanol injection so ill all ready have 2 fuels to fill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it be a track car, or live life a quarter mile at a time?

will be a track car ill have a extra set of rims with track slicks for race days but will have to set it up for the 1/4 at least once to see how fast it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thumbs down for -10's on a 26. On a 2.8 stroker or 30/26 they will be ok. Although I'd rather -5s personally even on a stroker.

Cheers Josh

Yeah, not so good on a 2.8 either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So any one have any advice on turbos bigger then -5s what would still have good response for this motor? and would i really get more power and response going to a single turbo ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So any one have any advice on turbos bigger then -5s what would still have good response for this motor? and would i really get more power and response going to a single turbo ?

GTX 60 mm might be a goer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So any one have any advice on turbos bigger then -5s what would still have good response for this motor? and would i really get more power and response going to a single turbo ?

go to a single guys have had really good results with the precision range that being said there is a whole results thread which should give you a good idea

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of pointless parts in the first post, things like the Tomei dumps, oversized valves etc. Lot of expense for no gain or even problems (Tomei crack).

IMO - Do some proper research.

i was thinking of just using the Tomei manifolds not the dumps I have to make custom dumps to fit the car im building but you say that Tomei crack ? thats no good thanks for the info ill continue to do my research

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lot of pointless parts in the first post, things like the Tomei dumps, oversized valves etc. Lot of expense for no gain or even problems (Tomei crack).

IMO - Do some proper research.

look out....friggn expert speaking!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...