Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone heard of, or been, fined as a result of an excessive reading at the track?

Read a ruling in some recent supp regs indicating it's possible/likely. :angry:

What is the fine for exceeding noise limits?

I reckon that on public roads they should give you a second chance to remedy it and then just send you home anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/
Share on other sites

You don't get fined for a reading over 75DB, you just get sent home. Makes it an awful waste of money to get to the track, knowing your car could be over the limit to get sent home. The noise limit's are strictly enforced, and because they are so well known, ignorance is no excuse. A track is NOT a public road, it is a private venue available for hire. Not only do you waste your money, you make it hard for everybody else and for the club holding the event by taking your over limit car to one of these events and trying to get away with it.

It's just way easier to make sure your car is under 75db at 30 metres.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-6922570
Share on other sites

I heard someone last week or the one b4 claim to be fined for excessive noise at Sandown last weekend or the one b4.

turned out when dug deeper he got busted leaving sandown on the street and busted by EPA

AFAIK we are on private property when on a track so we cannot be financially fined, just removed from the track

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-6922638
Share on other sites

I can confirm 100% without a shadow of a doubt at Sandown you do not receive a fine.

You get warned if you are over 75dba and given a chance to reduce the noise output. If you go out again and you are still over, then you get sent on your merry way :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-6923141
Share on other sites

Hmm. The sup regs for the upcoming John Mott Memorial Sandown mentions you may get fined for being over the noise limit.

http://www.nissancarclub.org.au/Events/Downloads/2013JohnMottMemorialSprint2013/John%20Mott%20Memorial%20Sprint%20REGS%202013.PDF

Blue text halfway down

I'm entering anyway so I'll make sure I'm only 74.98dba :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-6923913
Share on other sites

^ lol exactly, everyone has been doing that for years - and that's even if a tester rocks up (not always)... If they do, they usually set up in the same spots each time, so it's not hard to work out.

Also once the dude has gone home (rarely there the entire day at a club sprint)... Well... You know what to do :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-6925358
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Yup, no guilt in doing this either... In 95% of cases the race tracks were there before the houses that complain.

It's no different to building next to a major airport and complaining and in my opinion should be treated as such. i.e. houses should simply be told bad luck.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-7025991
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I should re-word my question.

Is the 75db limit in the supp regs correct? or is it possible that it has just been carried over from other events in the regs?

just curious because its the first time ive personally come across 75db for winton

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428420-noise-at-tracks/#findComment-7067934
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...