Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We did some wool tuff testing at Wakefield. Just to get an understanding of what the air is doing behind the car.

It's on some serious drugs. The wool between the bar and the body work was being sucked into the gap.

rtv34rtc343.png

Finished off the wing end plates with some paint.

IMG_2102.jpg

Expander foam worked. Still needs a sand and body filler.

Running out of time for Winton on the 3rd, so 12mm plywood slitter will have to do.

The splitter still needs all the mounts fabed up and the air dam fitted,

IMG_2100.jpg

  • Like 1

Just out of 2mm alloy sheet. I'm unsure of the grade. They weigh 340g ea. Rigid enough.

They are pretty big (though not as big as the doors, they are the same ones from the previous page). Who knows if they provide any benefit, until we get them on. We're going to make up some smaller more convention ones as well, just to see what the difference maybe.

There is a theory that lowering the profile of the end plate after the gurney will increase it's effect.

Yep, those holes produce a huge amount of drag and screw up the front splitter.

Front turn in and more so grip through higher speed corners is far more pronounced. It's spooky science shit, but it does work.

That's interesting about blocking up the holes, I actually cut holes in my bar in those spots and meshed it, one side to feed the air intake and one side to feed the oil cooler.

Will be interesting to see how my car reacts now with the splitter on.

Car looks good mate. Another fellow r33 peddler.

If your splitter works well you may need to jack your wing up higher to get into some clean air flow so it can balance out the front. It looks a little low there. Usually flush with the roof line is a good height to guarantee unmolested airflow. It made a huge difference to our car when we did it.

Car looks good mate. Another fellow r33 peddler.

If your splitter works well you may need to jack your wing up higher to get into some clean air flow so it can balance out the front. It looks a little low there. Usually flush with the roof line is a good height to guarantee unmolested airflow. It made a huge difference to our car when we did it.

Yeh limited by class rules to the level of the roof line. That photo is deceptive, the end plate are level with the roof.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have you put an aftermarket oil pressure gauge on and verified your oil pressure?   Noise being on the block, on exhaust side, how high up the block does it seem to be? It could be the VCT system getting cranky, especially if it's mainly at idle, and when warm, as that'll be your lowest point for oil pressure. Could be showing that oil passages / VCT solenoid are blocking.
    • Well, hydraulic lifters will get noisy if they are dirty/fouled in some way, and exactly how that manifests will depend on exactly what schmutz is where. There is a procedure on here somewhere for dismantling and soaking/cleaning them. Replacing them with new is about 50% of the work and about 5% of the money!
    • Thanks for the reply @GTSBoy this is is a hydraulic lifter engine. Yea right i did not realise the lifters were supposed to be compressible while installed. I could push them down but i had to lean almost my while body weight on them.  I have never heard of a lifter/ lifters ticking only at hot idle and getting worse the hotter it gets. I have owned a few jdm cars with noisy lifters. This noise is slightly more subtle, it is more of a sharp gentle metalic tic than the solid and more loud tapping I've heard on lifters. I have used a metal rod, alloy tube, hose and stethoscope and could not find the source of the tick. But it appears to be loudest on the actual engine block behind the exhaust cam gear and next to the oil filter. I had mate (40 year old mechanic) go over it with me and he couldn't find it either..  Could it be a cam seal issue of some sort?  Cheers  
    • This seems problematic and unlikely at the same time. Vanilla RB2Xs have hydraulic lifters. They do have "zero" clearance, but only when running with oil pressure inside them. When not running, you should be able to compress them and obtain heaps of clearance. RB26s and Neos have solid lifters. They should have ~0.3mm and ~0.5mm on the inlet and exhaust respectively. If they have zero clearance then bad things are happening. With nothing else being wrong, it would mean that the valves would be held slightly (ever so slightly) open when they are supposed to be closed and it should have all sorts of problems when running, caused by leakage in/out through the valves. Or, zero clearance can indicate severe valve seat recession. None of it is good. Have you used a piece of hose as a stethoscope to try to localise the noise?  
×
×
  • Create New...