Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We did some wool tuff testing at Wakefield. Just to get an understanding of what the air is doing behind the car.

It's on some serious drugs. The wool between the bar and the body work was being sucked into the gap.

rtv34rtc343.png

Finished off the wing end plates with some paint.

IMG_2102.jpg

Expander foam worked. Still needs a sand and body filler.

Running out of time for Winton on the 3rd, so 12mm plywood slitter will have to do.

The splitter still needs all the mounts fabed up and the air dam fitted,

IMG_2100.jpg

  • Like 1

Just out of 2mm alloy sheet. I'm unsure of the grade. They weigh 340g ea. Rigid enough.

They are pretty big (though not as big as the doors, they are the same ones from the previous page). Who knows if they provide any benefit, until we get them on. We're going to make up some smaller more convention ones as well, just to see what the difference maybe.

There is a theory that lowering the profile of the end plate after the gurney will increase it's effect.

Yep, those holes produce a huge amount of drag and screw up the front splitter.

Front turn in and more so grip through higher speed corners is far more pronounced. It's spooky science shit, but it does work.

That's interesting about blocking up the holes, I actually cut holes in my bar in those spots and meshed it, one side to feed the air intake and one side to feed the oil cooler.

Will be interesting to see how my car reacts now with the splitter on.

Car looks good mate. Another fellow r33 peddler.

If your splitter works well you may need to jack your wing up higher to get into some clean air flow so it can balance out the front. It looks a little low there. Usually flush with the roof line is a good height to guarantee unmolested airflow. It made a huge difference to our car when we did it.

Car looks good mate. Another fellow r33 peddler.

If your splitter works well you may need to jack your wing up higher to get into some clean air flow so it can balance out the front. It looks a little low there. Usually flush with the roof line is a good height to guarantee unmolested airflow. It made a huge difference to our car when we did it.

Yeh limited by class rules to the level of the roof line. That photo is deceptive, the end plate are level with the roof.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have an Elite 2500, honestly most of this has been a lot of smaller tasks chasing little details and a whole lot of life getting in the way of bigger projects. I don't mind too much looking at a spectrograph vs having audio knock ears. 
    • Nah nah nah nah. Don't do it. It's not all about the full throttle power delivery. The main "street fun" and drivability gains from smaller rear (in this case) is how you will have boost available from a low rpm when yo just roll onto the throttle. Think jinking in and out of traffic, coming out of roundabouts, etc etc, where you just want to roll onto the throttle a little and have the spooly noise from ~2000rpm and a swell of torque. More of what you've already achieved by going to 2.5. And then, towards the tail end of 2025 you can pull the turbo 4 out and put in a V8 like we originally suggested. :P
    • Cheers for the info mate, I'm old too, 60 years old next May, so a more linear delivery of the 0.86 would be better as baking tyres and snapping heads isn't on the cards for me or the car I assume a more linear power delivery would be better for engine and drivetrain reliability as well, IRT the torque load at lower RPM???, as well as lower EGT's???, if my understanding of that is correct, have I got that right??? I've only got a really basic understanding of turbo sizing and all there characteristics  Cheers for the useful information 
    • What kind of power delivery are you after? If it's nice and linear, the 0.86 would be better. If you're after bake tyres and head snaps on boost the 0.64 would be fun. I'm boring and old, so linear power is preferred. Lately I've been watching videos on Z06 Corvettes and super charged Mustangs.... 
    • I’d go the smaller rear just because you’re staying on 98, if e85 I’d go the bigger one
×
×
  • Create New...