Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I really want to run a forward facing (not even for the performance gain, but for the fact that changing plugs and setting timing become a harder task with the piping running it's current course).
Just wondering who has used what plenum? and a link to purchase.
Pro's and cons of said plenum?
What you've had to move in the engine bay to run the plenum?
Have you had to modify the plenum itself to fit?
If the throttle cable didn't reach, which cable did you use?
Did the tps wiring reach or did it need extending?

Any other valuable information is appreciated.

Cheers, Cameron.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428716-rb20det-forward-facing-plenum/
Share on other sites

I agree with the comment above... in most cases going for a front facing plenum is going to be a performance loss, not a gain. This is due to the shorter runner length robbing you of torque low in the rev range. Due to the smaller capacity this will be very apparent with the RB20 engine and make it a pig for day to day driving.

You can get cheap copies of the Plazmaman style plenum top on eBay, this will retain your lower runners which is probably the best compromise.

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/All-New-POLISHED-Nissan-R32-Skyline-RB20DET-RB20-GTS-Intake-Manifold-Plenum-/121040978566?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item1c2e9ac286

Keep the stock one, unless you just want your bay to look 'neater'

I was going to get the plazmaman rb20 plenum, but after reading a lot of info about these going onto rb20det it's a loss in power.

Also supposably it bolts straight on BUT other things will get in the way, battery ect.

So I'm sticking with stock, good for 270kw or more. An rb20 probably won't see much more than that anyway..

This was one of the plenums that caught my eye as it looks relatively standard to someone (ie: a cop) who doesn't know much about plenums and would only be looking for shiny chrome.

Anyone on here used it and has some feedback?

I simply wouldn't do this to any RB engine unless I was putting a high mount turbo on and there was simply no hope of keeping the inlet pipe running across the engine toward the turbo. All other reasons (appearance, accessibility of coils/plugs) are insufficient for the compromises and arse pain involved.

I simply wouldn't do this to any RB engine unless I was putting a high mount turbo on and there was simply no hope of keeping the inlet pipe running across the engine toward the turbo. All other reasons (appearance, accessibility of coils/plugs) are insufficient for the compromises and arse pain involved.

I have a t04e high mount using a stock plenum.. Still not changing though.. :) ..the plenum that is.

My t04e can get farrrrked

Edited by Zrobe

The use of the word "and" in my post is required to understand the meaning of it. The necessary conditions would be highmount AND inability to keep the crossover pipe clear.

lol relax man

I've actually ordered a plazmaman plenum for mine to simply clean up the engine bay and make everything easier to get to, I'm just waiting for it to turn up. So far I'll have to extend the tps wires and I'm not too sure what I'm going to do with the coolant pipes yet but I'll let you know how I go.

Just do it like the pic that johnnilicte posted. All the money you will spend on this could go to another turbo, or tune, or injectors, or guages or anything else you want. You will spend the money then regret it like i did on my RB25 when i bought a china front mount and all i had was issues, and for what? Nothing.

That's definitely going to be plan B, but it's only solving one problem..

I'm still going to do more research until I can completely rule out a forward facing, then I will retreat to Plan B.

I make money to spend it, and it's not really that much. I see it as more of a gain than a waste so I'm happy to justify a few hundred on a new plenum if it makes my life easier down the track.

Also, I don't want another turbo or any other mods to this engine along those lines. I'm keeping the car the way it is (to a certain extent) so I can enter it in the AS class for nationals and still have a car that's happy to be street driven. My extra cash goes into the track car which is where I want the power.

It's not a gain. It is a waste. And no, there are no options for bolting anything onto the standard runners that are as good as the standard plenum. Those options are only the least worst.

Big FFPs are for motors making massive power that need a big increase in plenum volume (and a suitable increase in TB size and so on). There's no need at all at anything up to quite unstreetable power levels.

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
    • I know right. It baffled me. There's no way when the engine is off, key is in ignition, (coils are dissconnected aswell), also my sound system was dissconnected (I don't run any audio capacitors), battery reads 12.2v and with the 10amp fuse blown I was measuring 24 to 30v. The reading would move a bit from 30v to 24v which was weird. I took a pic of the multi meter reading 🤣: (This is a brand new single channel digital oscilloscope that also has a multi meter mode).   Before when the fuse was blown, I had one lead on the 12v supply (green/white wires) of that brown relay and the other lead on the negative battery terminal. When I turned the key on ignition (engine off), it would read 30v. Then when I removed that relay from it's plug and tried putting ignition on again, it would read 12v, but I think it's because it can't turn on the ecu now that I removed it. I asked Chatgpt and this is what it had to say:   Not sure if those theories would be possible but, any auto sparkies here? welcome to confirm. 🤷‍♂️  No idea, but if it happens again, atleast I know what type of issue it is, unlike last few months where I didn't know what was causing all my issues and I was just taking stabs in the dark to figure out what type of problem it was. If it does happen again I'm going to investigate futher and trace back the source even more and inspect more circuits. I drove it to work this morning and the car drove and boosted fine. Yeah I was thinking the same, so I've imported my back up saved map (which is the map that I saved when it got done tuning) back onto my haltech with the base fuel pressure set to 43.5psi.
    • Yeh nice, if your in melbourne could you recommend any exhaust shops in the east that do a good job?
    • Sorry yes, this is what im after Also, that jpjdm site appears to be offline
×
×
  • Create New...