Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

what injectors? i would not be too concerned unless its bouncing, its not uncommon to to run 60-80 base pressures depending on target boost and pump capabilities. ID recommend a base of 60-100psi depending on application. I generally run 60psi on bigger injectors ie 1000 and 2000cc.

Basically keep TOTAL pressure under the injectors limits.

ID725 - 8.5 bar, 123.5 psi.

ID850 - 7.0 bar, 101.5 psi.

ID1000 - 7.0 bar, 101.5 psi.

ID2000 - 9.0 bar, 130.5 psi.

Good point, worst come to worst can just aim for 60psi instead of have it happening as an effect, ID1000s will love it anyway. Only issue for him is he'll need the fuel table to be touched up to suit the new flow rates of the injectors if it is currently tuned for 43psi.

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

what injectors? i would not be too concerned unless its bouncing, its not uncommon to to run 60-80 base pressures depending on target boost and pump capabilities. ID recommend a base of 60-100psi depending on application. I generally run 60psi on bigger injectors ie 1000 and 2000cc.

Basically keep TOTAL pressure under the injectors limits.

ID725 - 8.5 bar, 123.5 psi.

ID850 - 7.0 bar, 101.5 psi.

ID1000 - 7.0 bar, 101.5 psi.

ID2000 - 9.0 bar, 130.5 psi.

I was thinking this would/could be the case but didn't have any figures to back it up or any idea where to look first. It's not like his fuel pressure will rise much if any higher than what he is getting at idle either due to the motor using much more fuel when on boost. Not even close to the ID pressure limits

Like Trent said, as long as the pressure is stable at that point, it can be tuned around. Simply bumping the base up to 60psi would help with the spray patterns, and you have the pump to supply such high pressures.

Just remember you need to add your boost pressure to the base pressure to get your maximum rail pressure, and the pump flow will drop off as it gets above 80psi.

If the original 255L/PH was creating 43psi @ 14V then of course the 460L/PH will create a higher pressure at the same voltage as its flowing more fuel.

Just adjust the flow back to what its tuned at otherwise you will be running richer than normal.

If the original 255L/PH was creating 43psi @ 14V then of course the 460L/PH will create a higher pressure at the same voltage as its flowing more fuel.

That's simply not true. The regulator controls the pressure to the setpoint, not the pump. But if perchance the regulator is too small to pass all the extra flow back to the tank, then it loses control and the pressure will rise until it is high enough to squirt the required amount of fuel back through the reg.

There is nothing you can do to adjust a reg which is simply too small.

Furthermore, and to add some caution into the advice that has been given so far........don't be tempted to just retune it to run at this new pressure. Doing so could be fatal to the engine. I will explain. Note that I am making the assumption that the reg is now too small to control the fuel pressure against such a large pump. If this is not true, then discount what I say in this case, but keep it in mind as a general warning.

The new fuel pressure is not controlled at 60ish psi. It is sitting there purely by virtue of the fact that the pump is running flat out trying to jam the fuel back through the port in the reg. If you now tune the fuelling to work at that pressure, that's all good, except that the flow/pressure characteristic of the pump may change. It may change as the pump wears (it might take years, or it might "wear in" over a period of a hundred hours - who knows). It may change with large changes in fuel temperature - so, winter to summer variation, or perhaps just the heating of the tank you get from passing so much fuel through the rail and back to the tank. I'm sure there are half a dozen other ways it might change. If it does change, then because the regulator is not in control, then the pressure will change. It might rise or it might fall. A fall is much more likely with most possible causes of change that I can think of.

Of course if the pressure falls away from what you've tuned at, and it is sufficiently lower than what you tuned at while you have load on the engine (that's debatable because by this time the engine will be using a bit of the fuel and relieving the task of the regulator) then you could damage the engine. It all really depends on how much fuel you need to be using in the engine before the regulator gets back in control and can maintain the rail pressure at the existing setting.

I'm just sayin'. I would be cautious if it were me. Find out the real cause for the out of control pressure before making decisions on what to do is my advice.

That's simply not true. The regulator controls the pressure to the setpoint, not the pump. But if perchance the regulator is too small to pass all the extra flow back to the tank, then it loses control and the pressure will rise until it is high enough to squirt the required amount of fuel back through the reg.

There is nothing you can do to adjust a reg which is simply too small.

Furthermore, and to add some caution into the advice that has been given so far........don't be tempted to just retune it to run at this new pressure. Doing so could be fatal to the engine. I will explain. Note that I am making the assumption that the reg is now too small to control the fuel pressure against such a large pump. If this is not true, then discount what I say in this case, but keep it in mind as a general warning.

The new fuel pressure is not controlled at 60ish psi. It is sitting there purely by virtue of the fact that the pump is running flat out trying to jam the fuel back through the port in the reg. If you now tune the fuelling to work at that pressure, that's all good, except that the flow/pressure characteristic of the pump may change. It may change as the pump wears (it might take years, or it might "wear in" over a period of a hundred hours - who knows). It may change with large changes in fuel temperature - so, winter to summer variation, or perhaps just the heating of the tank you get from passing so much fuel through the rail and back to the tank. I'm sure there are half a dozen other ways it might change. If it does change, then because the regulator is not in control, then the pressure will change. It might rise or it might fall. A fall is much more likely with most possible causes of change that I can think of.

Of course if the pressure falls away from what you've tuned at, and it is sufficiently lower than what you tuned at while you have load on the engine (that's debatable because by this time the engine will be using a bit of the fuel and relieving the task of the regulator) then you could damage the engine. It all really depends on how much fuel you need to be using in the engine before the regulator gets back in control and can maintain the rail pressure at the existing setting.

I'm just sayin'. I would be cautious if it were me. Find out the real cause for the out of control pressure before making decisions on what to do is my advice.

When I mentioned retuning to the new pressure I meant to change the FPR setting to target 60psi... not just leave it at the current setting to hold 60psi, if that makes sense?

Bare in mind that the 60psi will not be differential pressure while the engine is running, and it is also probably damn near the worst case scenario for the FPR to have to deal with while the engine is idling - as soon as load or rpm go up the injectors will work more and the FPR will need to return less.

what injectors? i would not be too concerned unless its bouncing, its not uncommon to to run 60-80 base pressures depending on target boost and pump capabilities. ID recommend a base of 60-100psi depending on application. I generally run 60psi on bigger injectors ie 1000 and 2000cc.

Basically keep TOTAL pressure under the injectors limits.

ID725 - 8.5 bar, 123.5 psi.

ID850 - 7.0 bar, 101.5 psi.

ID1000 - 7.0 bar, 101.5 psi.

ID2000 - 9.0 bar, 130.5 psi.

I'm using ID1000's, so that should work if I can't get the pressure back down. Although I will have to double check whether the pressure is stable or bouncing, it may have been bouncing...

Have you tried adjusting the base pressure when the engine is running?

If not, do that and report back

I haven't, no. I was going to, but thought it was all working correctly prior to the new pump, so if it's all correct then it shouldn't have changed? I didn't want to cover up any error I made by changing something else. Though I guess if the reg/return hose is too small then I just won't be able to lower the pressure at all?

That's simply not true. The regulator controls the pressure to the setpoint, not the pump. But if perchance the regulator is too small to pass all the extra flow back to the tank, then it loses control and the pressure will rise until it is high enough to squirt the required amount of fuel back through the reg.

There is nothing you can do to adjust a reg which is simply too small.

Furthermore, and to add some caution into the advice that has been given so far........don't be tempted to just retune it to run at this new pressure. Doing so could be fatal to the engine. I will explain. Note that I am making the assumption that the reg is now too small to control the fuel pressure against such a large pump. If this is not true, then discount what I say in this case, but keep it in mind as a general warning.

The new fuel pressure is not controlled at 60ish psi. It is sitting there purely by virtue of the fact that the pump is running flat out trying to jam the fuel back through the port in the reg. If you now tune the fuelling to work at that pressure, that's all good, except that the flow/pressure characteristic of the pump may change. It may change as the pump wears (it might take years, or it might "wear in" over a period of a hundred hours - who knows). It may change with large changes in fuel temperature - so, winter to summer variation, or perhaps just the heating of the tank you get from passing so much fuel through the rail and back to the tank. I'm sure there are half a dozen other ways it might change. If it does change, then because the regulator is not in control, then the pressure will change. It might rise or it might fall. A fall is much more likely with most possible causes of change that I can think of.

Of course if the pressure falls away from what you've tuned at, and it is sufficiently lower than what you tuned at while you have load on the engine (that's debatable because by this time the engine will be using a bit of the fuel and relieving the task of the regulator) then you could damage the engine. It all really depends on how much fuel you need to be using in the engine before the regulator gets back in control and can maintain the rail pressure at the existing setting.

I'm just sayin'. I would be cautious if it were me. Find out the real cause for the out of control pressure before making decisions on what to do is my advice.

Yeh this was my thought, I wanted to be careful about changing things, hence this thread.

Good point, worst come to worst can just aim for 60psi instead of have it happening as an effect, ID1000s will love it anyway. Only issue for him is he'll need the fuel table to be touched up to suit the new flow rates of the injectors if it is currently tuned for 43psi.

Getting the car retuned isn't an issue, I'm in the process of setting the car up for flex-fuel so it was going to go back on the dyno for that anyway. The issue is I suppose it won't be driveable until I do get it tuned?

I just had another thought about what may be causing the higher pressure, as I realised how I set the regulator up when I installed it. I put it at the top of the strut tower, but didn't want to relocate or delete the stock fuel dampener that sits right next to it. So I looped the fuel hose coming out of the regulator down around the fuel filter, and then back up again into the dampener. If you follow? It's not a tight loop, the hose doesn't kink at all I was trying to think about flow. In fact it seemed like it would be less of a restriction than having the hose come straight out of the regulator and 90 degrees into the dampener. But perhaps this is something that I've done on my car that explains why it hasn't been a problem for anyone else?

Fortunately my Zeitronix ECA kit should be arriving today sometime and I need to install that in the return line anyway, so I will try unbolting the dampner and unlooping that hose, see if it changes anything.

It doesn't NEED to be, it's just that IDs like higher pressure. At 43psi ID1000s will not be actually flowing 1000cc/min - they'll be fine though.

Check this out:

ID1000SumData.gif

43psi is only at idle though, once you take into account 20psi and the reg now sitting at 63psi (give/take) - works out ok?

That's simply not true. The regulator controls the pressure to the setpoint, not the pump.

Correct, but I would've thought changing pump only, and not reg aswell to suit higher capacity pump, then of course you will see a increase in pressure at the reg because its now pushing almost double the amount of fuel. as before. And as you mentioned if the reg cant return the excess back quick enough then up she goes!

:yucky:

Correct, but I would've thought changing pump only, and not reg aswell to suit higher capacity pump, then of course you will see a increase in pressure at the reg because its now pushing almost double the amount of fuel. as before. And as you mentioned if the reg cant return the excess back quick enough then up she goes!

:yucky:

Well I can eliminate that theory, just tried adjusting the FPR without any luck. Can't get it below 60psi no matter how far I turn it. I turned it up to about 63psi, though I think I will turn it up a little bit more just to be sure the regulator is in control again.

Just to be sure, would this be considered a 'stable' fuel pressure? Or is this bouncing too much?

The dead times are under the voltage heading, flow rate is under the flow rate heading to the far right

Yeah this is how I read it, but someone said before that at stock Fuel pressure the injectors wouldnt actually be flowing 1000cc, wasn't sure if I was missing something. All good

Is there something restricting the FPR fuel return flow or inlet flow? What sort of Reg is it?

Yeah this is how I read it, but someone said before that at stock Fuel pressure the injectors wouldnt actually be flowing 1000cc, wasn't sure if I was missing something. All good

Is there something restricting the FPR fuel return flow or inlet flow? What sort of Reg is it?

It's a Sard FPR, I forget what type, but same as this one:

http://justjap.com/store/product.php?productid=16736

I'm not sure if the loop I've got in the return line before the dampener is causing any issues. It could be.

That fuel pressure is rock steady.

Awesome, thanks mate.

How far should I up the fuel pressure to be sure that the regulator has control again? Just over the minimum I can run, or should I up it by a bit, say to 70psi?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Sorry had a bit of a week and haven't had heaps of time to follow this, so apologies if I've missed something - any chance of showing a log with the rpm, turbo speed, MAP, and wgdc all in one view? Definitely an "interesting" problem, and while it's definitely worth noting that there was a similar issue with the twins I'd not completely put all bets on the root cause being the same thing.  Keep an open mind, follow the data.
    • I built this engine approximately 12 years ago so my own head (brain) is a little grey on the exact hardware in the RB head, however what I recall is. Stock RB25 NEO TURBO Intake Camshaft HKS 260 degree Exhaust Camshaft (R34 GTR) RB25 NEO Turbo Springs  I ported/removed the exhaust stud humps found in the RB25 head so theres less turbulence but it wasn't ported/polished properly, just a hump removal. I've attached two pictures of the before and after to illustrate.     The ECU gets its boost reference from the nipple on the rear of the head on the intake side, behind the fuel rail. The wastegate gets its boost reference from a nipple on the cooler pipe immediately after the comp cover.  Could a decent pressure drop across the intercooler cause the wastegate to be seeing a higher PSI than what the ECU is seeing, and thus it can't control it accurately and quick enough?   We ran a line to the actuator and watched it open and close using an air compressor, while we didn't have a gauge on the line to see when it was cracking open, it was opening smoothly.  I just removed the gate now and even though the documentation says you need to open it in a vice due to preload (which I did), there wasn't any preload on the cap, which is something we noticed straight out of the box as well when new. This silver cap internally is threaded to the actuator rod that runs out the bottom of the straightgate. Not sure how I'm supposed to get this spring out to be frank.. Potentially but everyone else doesn't appear to have to stop at 500kw because of 6boosts design.  I would, but I think I'm getting to that point where if I'm going to do the head and make another 100kw, then I'm going to need a fancy gearbox and quite a few other things and 10k becomes 20k becomes 30k within a few months. I'm not necessarily sold on the idea just yet that the head is restrictive at 4000rpm (and what.. 300kw?) and yet doesn't seem to be restrictive at 7000rpm when it's making 500kw, however I'm obviously not closing the door on that theory.
    • Yeah - Half the problem is I know this sensor actually goes to 150C.. I'm pretty certain it is min of 11C. So still more data required I suppose. It's really quite hard to get the oil temp to 100+ then immediately pull over and take a reading before the temp drops. Annoyingly I suppose the range I really 'want' is likely 80 -> 120C. TBH the ecu can't really *do* anything with it, and the gauge itself is very visible... ...but you know how it is.
    • My EFR 8474 Black, made 800awhp on a roller dyno. at 25-26psi. E85. Shaft speed was around 106,000rpm 1.01 rear. The rear is maxed.  6 boost Turbosmart 60mm gate 3.5inch exhaust  Head is worked to the shithouse. Bain racing. VCam. 272 exhaust. RB28 - RB26 foundation.  You have an intake issue. Start getting proper data and I mean go back to the simple things.  - Pressure test your intake - Block off the Turbo BOV, you don't need it.  - Test pressure before and after your intercooler If your head is pretty stock, that is your issue. Especially if it is NA.  Take it off and spend $10k on it. 
    • Temp = -21.052 X Voltage + 114   That should get you pretty close. Calcs based on two points I could do easy calcs on (30 and 70 degrees).   It also says your sensor should only read as low as 9 degrees when it maxes out at 5V, and should hit a peak of 114 degrees at 0V... Just as a heads up if you were going really cold places, or wanting to be aware when temps really go up with it.
×
×
  • Create New...