Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so thought i would UP this. Looks extremely good and is also running on a new engine compared to the old MW 3. Due out 5/11/2013

Call of Duty: Ghosts is the next game in the Call of Duty series set to release in 2013. The new Infinity Ward team has been working on an entirely new storyline and engine, which is said to bring Call of Duty to the next generation. Ghosts will be available on both of current systems, theXbox One and the PlayStation 4. At Microsoft's Xbox reveal conference, Activision announced that Xbox One owners will receive timed DLCexclusives

The Story of Call of Duty: Ghosts takes place a few years after the USA has fallen. The remaining soldiers fight in guerrilla warfare to stay alive and take back their country. Promises some good things. Video of the new engine here

CODGhostsGoodBoy.jpg

CODGhosts_UnderwaterAmbush.jpg

CODGhosts_ServerRoomTakedown.jpg

Edited by Frosty
  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428872-call-of-duty-ghosts/
Share on other sites

I'm not to sure about this one. Alot of the times the trailers make the game look like it is going to be amazing fun to play and then for whatever reason they dont deliver. Hoping to be proven wrong, and I'll probably no doubt buy it anyway, but BO2 looked amazing, but didnt deliver as much as MW3 for me. I still play BO2 though, still good fun

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 months later...

so now that this is out i gotta say im a bit disappointed with the game as a whole. TDM seems to be a 1 hit 1 kill kinda thing and you always get owned. Single player was rather average aswell

on the other hand extinction isnt bad and is a take on treyachs zombies idea. Pretty fun

Anyone been finding squads ultra laggy? I can shoot at the bots and then they turn and kill me then on the killcam ive only fired about 3 bullets before Ive died

Fairly disappointed. Will keep playing for a while but not sure how long that will last. Maybe it will be better on ps4

so now that this is out i gotta say im a bit disappointed with the game as a whole. TDM seems to be a 1 hit 1 kill kinda thing and you always get owned. Single player was rather average aswell

on the other hand extinction isnt bad and is a take on treyachs zombies idea. Pretty fun

A mate has it and agrees. He said there's no shortage of quickscopers either...it's worse than ever.

Anyone been finding squads ultra laggy? I can shoot at the bots and then they turn and kill me then on the killcam ive only fired about 3 bullets before Ive died

Fairly disappointed. Will keep playing for a while but not sure how long that will last. Maybe it will be better on ps4

havent had any issues with lag yet. only played for like TDM for like 20mins as it was utter sh!t. Did play online for like an hr or 2 with the extinction map. No lag issues there.

Loading time is fuber aswell. tho after GTA V it seems reasonable lol

Might have just been to much traffic when I was on. Have played before and has been alright.

Feeling it might be time to switch to battlefield but..... at least till next cod with zombies. Extinction is pretty good but

I had my first go tonight, I like it! I find you spawn into the action straight away. You can't presume you'll have to run to the action, you're in it! I like the physics of it, seems to move well.

Played the Battlefield beta and was disappointed.... Offers SOOOOOO much and BF just never quite delivers for me.

I've ordered a Sex Box One with COD, Forza 5 and Watch Dogs (when it eventually makes it). See what COD is like on that, better be amazing...

I play Hardcore only (once you can) so I don't mind the one shot kill thing.... But in non hardcore I could see how it would be annoying. I watched a Youtube video and they were saying they made it a lot harder to quick scope so interested to hear that there seems to be more doing it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...