Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

^What he said

Also, high flow cats make a noticeable difference for both power and economy.

Any way you can remove/minimise restrictions will net you a slight increase in power and economy.

Pm35 power is good enough for normal commuting but does not have the torque that the nm35 has.

Also, the 3.5 doesn't really do much below 3000rpm. It is better than the VQ25det down there, but is much more enjoyable between 3500-6000.

As an ex-nm35 owner and current pnm35 owner, there is no chance I would go back... even though I do miss the torque from the turbo.

you will never re-map it for more fuel economy. It runs wideband o2 connection as scotty said. Unless you want the tuner to lean tune it and loose torque to gain economy, it just wont work. Removing the fuel out the top end will give economy, because it runs <10.5:1 AFR in the top end, but if your that concerned about econ, you wont be flogging it.

anyway, its just not economical. So youll need to get over that if you want one, or buy a diesel.

ECU dictates the target AFR, not whether the car has wideband o2 sensors or not.

Remap for a leaner AFR would mean better economy. Nobody said that the tune has to target 14.7:1, especially if you manage a way to get a more complete and efficient combustion process...

ECU dictates the target AFR, not whether the car has wideband o2 sensors or not.

Remap for a leaner AFR would mean better economy. Nobody said that the tune has to target 14.7:1, especially if you manage a way to get a more complete and efficient combustion process...

As Alex mentioned, leaning out the mixture drops the energy available to combust and usually means you need to put your foot down more, just to get the torque required to cruise. I must admit I haven't played around with petrol mixtures a lot, as leaning out 98 is a bad idea generally, but running a huge range of ethanol tunes from 10:1 through to over 20:1 on cruise I now realise near stoich is where it's at. Leaning it out to 15's is going to barely make a difference to the wallet unfortunately. Foot control of the pedal has more chance of fuel savings.

Seriously, they are never going to be lean running cars, they are simply too heavy to compete with modern buzz boxes with their skinny tyres and sub 1 ton weight. Thinking a quick retune will gain noticeable savings... Perhaps if you plan to do massive k's to cover the tune costs. Limiting the throttle to 20% would be a better idea. :P

[minor threadjack]

front wise, anything from 350z/V35 to the end of the Y pipe, rear of that, anything from a V35/G35 sedan

Does this hold true for PNM35s as well or does the AWD get in the way? I've been trying to find something for mine and while I've found the Zee's ones on YAJ they'd cost over $2K landed here in NZ and I'm pretty sure I could get a reasonable custom one built for that price.

[/minor threadjack]

Edited by Hertz Donut

[minor threadjack]

Does this hold true for PNM35s as well or does the AWD get in the way? I've been trying to find something for mine and while I've found the Zee's ones on YAJ they'd cost over $2K landed here in NZ and I'm pretty sure I could get a reasonable custom one built for that price.

[/minor threadjack]

The Y pipe 350z v PNM35 is very different, to get around the transfer case. Thats one difference. The other potential difference is the front shaft with HFCs or test pipes. I just don't know if they will fit or not. Some have massive seperate chambers etc, but the normal single HFC ones should fit ok.

Carbon canister is still there, it just sits horizontally and without the bracket.

V36 exhaust has massive rear mufflers and yes, the driver side one has to be "persuaded" to clear the spare wheel well lol.

Also, Scott had to weld up two additional exhaust mounts to hang the driver side on.

No problem with HFC's from the US. My PNM35 has G35 Berk cats which bolt straight up to the standard exhaust... they also bolt up to my V36 exhaust.

NM35 cat-back exhausts will also bolt up to a series 2 Y-pipe, regardless of whether it is 2WD or AWD.

As Alex said, the only thing that won't fit is the 350z/G35/V35 2WD y-pipe, so if you are looking at a US exhaust make sure it will fit on a 2003-2004 G35x.

Also, forget any coupe exhaust due to the spare wheel well.

If you are looking at headers, be warned that some of the 350z headers will foul on a PNM35 bodywork. You can fit them, but some will be sitting on the bodywork which is not so good considering how much the engine can move...

Zees exhausts cost heaps but seem to be very good quality from everything I have read (sound good too). Probably cheaper to get someone to fabricate up some exhaust mounts to fit a V36 exhaust and purchase a V36 (or G37x compatible) exhaust if you want dual mufflers though ;)

  • 3 years later...

Reviving an old thread here. (trying to find info on using different model cat back exhausts)

I've got a pm35 stagea, wondering if other models like M35 or NM35 aftermarket cat backs will bolt up?

For example:
https://www.rhdjapan.com/fujitsubo-legalis-r-exhaust-muffler-nm35.html

 

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 馃槂
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
    • Ah, I thought he'd wired it to one of the spare ECU inputs! Too long ago since I read that post, ha ha. I've been arguing with radiators, harmonic balancers, alternators and rust since reading it.
    • Correct. The ECU cannot read oil temp. (Well, I think it probably can in some situations. I did have the thought of potentially repinning the ECU when I was doing oil pressure). I am using this into the MPVI dongle, so that the MPVI dongle can read oil temperature. It is attached to a VDO gauge which is obviously calibrated to whatever curve the sender actually is using. This would be easy if I could setup a table of voltage to temperature like many sensors, but it appears I cannot do this and can only setup the transform rule which appears to be Input (voltage) x Multiplier, and add an offset. This to me means it MUST be linear. So it may be a complete waste of time wiring this into the ECU. The idea was that the MPVI3 has standalone logging. I wanted to use this instead of a laptop with serial cable (for wideband) for long datalogs. Given the wideband also has electric interference, I may never trust this either in a world where the serial wideband and the analog output wideband do not agree. Last time I did a trace I could see the two wideband traces follow each other, but one was a little leaner than the other. I plan on playing with voltage offsets and actually driving the thing to see how close they correlate. If they never correlate... then, well, maybe I'll never use either. Ideally I'd like to have the Analog wideband read ever so slightly leaner than the serial one, because the serial one is 'correct'. Tuning the car to be ever so slightly too-rich would be the aim. Not needing to have a laptop flying around in the footwell connected with cables is... an advantage. About the only one from the forced upgrade to MPVI3.
    • Hopefully not, since he knows the fuses work ha ha ha
  • Create New...