Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey i am about to buy an r32 actuator myself.. some people have noted that they get a slight boost increase in their r33s after adding an exhaust, front mount etc..

so if i was to put in the r32 actuator.. and then later get a stainless dump/front and a front mount.. would it go over 10psi? i don't really want any higher boost levels (turbo/engine is stock)

thanks

In my case it did still spike, with the split dump.

But when i went back to the stock dump and HKS front it was fine.

So from experience, id recommend a bellmouth if you are going to upgrade.

  • 2 months later...

Hey All,

I used to have a bleed valve boost controller running 13psi no problemo and have recently gone back to the stock solenoid.

I have spliced the ground cable to a switch that allows me to choose low or high boost mode.

On low boost, it runs at about 7psi (I have a bellmouth 3" exhaust) so it's all normal there;

When I flick the switch to high boost mode, the boost just keeps increasing until the "boost-cut" R&R function activates.

I've checked many times in case I hooked up the solenoid incorrectly by comparing with other people's skylines but all is well.

Does anyone have an idea as to what it could be???

All replies are appreciated,

Elias

just wrote a whole bloody essay reply and internet explorer shit itself!!! grrr! :D

anyway

elias i would seem to think that you dont have the standard restrictor tubing? its a piece of tube from IC piping (from memory) with a red ring on a certain spot. when that area of the tube it squeezed it feels solid. u will need this to run the 4psi low boost and 7psi high boost modes.

hope this helps

Edited by SLY-25T
just wrote a whole bloody essay reply and internet explorer shit itself!!! grrr! :D

anyway

elias i would seem to think that you dont have the standard restrictor tubing? its a piece of tube from IC piping (from memory) with a red ring on a certain spot. when that area of the tube it squeezed it feels solid. u will need this to run the 4psi low boost and 7psi high boost modes.

hope this helps

Thanks Jaye, much appreciated :D . Unfortunately I don't have the restrictor tubing so I guess it's low boost mode for the time being.

Elias

  • 1 month later...

Why mess up ya stock wiring when u can just disconnect the the stock boost control solinode un plug it and bin it. Then just run some vacume hose from ya cooler pipe to ya wastegate? Has the same outcome (max wastegate preassure) looks cleaner and is heaps quicker.

But then it doesnt bleed off a few extra PSi. Will only run whatever the R33 actuator is set to, 7psi i believe.

Better still, i binned mine and put a 10psi R32 actuator in.

  • 1 month later...

I've read a couple of DIY's and tried this one (and a few others too).

Fyi; I own a 1993 R33 since last week, the engine is as good as stock except for some bolt-on mods (an open air filter, a 2.5" downpipe and a 3" catback).

I've read the first few pages, and came to the conclusion that I had to;

- split the black wire, and connect the solenoid-side to a permanent ground ground,

- leave the white wire alone as it is in the loom.

So I hooked the black wire coming out of the solenoid up to a permanent ground, taped in the ground , but all I got after warming the car up was 5psi, all the way to the rev limiter.

So I got to trouble-shooting; I meassured 13.4v using the grounding point I got, and the positive from te plug that's on the loom, so it's got good working wiring.

As far as I know, I didn't make a mistake, maybe you can spot one... here's a real crappy picture of the setup;

solenoid-ground.jpg

Did I make a n00bie mistake and wire up the wrong solenoid or something?

I should do that don't I hehe, but I've got 'adequate' knowledge about turbocharged Honda Civics, so I still need to look into re-tuning options and what's needed or not, etc.

Right now, I'd just like to create a nice driving car within the boundries of it's stock ECU mapping, so in the meanwhile I can learn.

Now I'm looking into this;

Why mess up ya stock wiring when u can just disconnect the the stock boost control solinode un plug it and bin it. Then just run some vacume hose from ya cooler pipe to ya wastegate? Has the same outcome (max wastegate preassure) looks cleaner and is heaps quicker.

There is a piece of tubing between the actuator and cold-side charge-air pipe, with a T-piece going to the solenoid, also a piece of tubing between the BOV-recirc pipe and the solenoid;

ECR33%20stock%20boost%20solenoid%20setup.gif

When I'm getting Davo's post right, all I need to do is;

- remove the solenoid

- close the opening on the BOV-recirc pipe

- run a straight piece of vacuum hose between the cold-side charge air pipe and the actuator.

It should then look like this;

ECR33%20modded%20boost%20solenoid%20setup.gif

This will give me the full 7psi an R33 actuator will allow... am I right?

I hope so, if so, tomorrow will be solenoid-removal day :banana:

If not, please flame me for being an fng, and tell me what in my drawing I is wrong.

Perfect. Exactly what i did, but as mentioned with the 10psi R32 Actuator :laugh:

I struggled to find a little nipple to block the BOV vac line, i didnt like the idea of a bolt.

Managed to score one from a wrecker. I think it was from a old Camry intake manifold :laugh: Works a treat and is so tidy.

EDIT: Amazing Paint jigs btw :banana:

Edited by gotRICE?

I did some work on it today, and removed the solenoid.

5psi, and nothing more.

So, reinstalled the solenoid, gives me the 7psi again from 4500rpm.

Too bad it doesn't work...

Is the r32 item a straight swap over for the R33 item?

Yes it is.

All you need to do is block off the Vac line that went from the solenoid to the intake, and run one line straight from the Intercooler piping to the actuator.

I decided to do this the easy way and grounded the black wire. I've never liked electrical tape so I went with black shrink wrap followed by tape. This was my first engine mod to my skyline and I'm very happy with it. Ive never been a redline or nothing driver and usually use the gears to get where Im going so I rarely made it past 4500rpm. Now I've got 7psi all throughout the rev range and the car feels much quicker. The 2psi really does make a difference. I would recommend this mod to anyone

Here's a pic of mine

lol @ not liking electrical tape but using it anyway!

Heatshrink is key. So long as you made sure it was long enough to properly cover the connection its all you need. And looks much neater.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • In the context of cam 'upgrader' I mean generally people who upgrade headers/cams - not my specific change. I mean it makes sense that if I had a bigger cam, I may get more false lean readings. So if I went smaller, I'd get less false lean readings. To a point where perhaps stock.. I'd have no false lean readings, according to the ECU. But I'm way richer than stock. My bigger than normal cam in the past also was giving false rich leanings. It's rather odd and doesn't add up or pass the pub test. Realistically what I want is the narrowbands to effectively work as closed loop fuel control and keep my AFR around 14.7 on light sections of the map. Which is of course the purpose of narrowband CL fuel control. So if I can change the switch points so the NB's target 14.7 (as read by my WB) then this should be fine. Haven't actually tested to see what the changed switchpoints actually result in - car needs to be in a position it can idle for awhile to do that. I suspect it will be a troublesome 15 min drive home with lots of stalling and way too rich/lean transient nightmare bucking away for that first drive at 2am or whevener it ends up being. Hopefully it's all tune-able. Realistically it should be. This is a very mild cam.
    • Messing with narrowband switchovers is a terrible bandaid. I don't want to think about it. You are a cam "upgrader" only in concept. As you said, your new cam is actually smaller, so it's technically a downgrade. OK, likely a very small downgrade, but nevertheless. But the big thing that will be the most likely suspect is the change of the advance angle. That change could be equivalent to a substantial decrease in cam lobe duration. I haven't gone to the effort of trying to think about what your change would actually cause. But until someone (you, me (unlikely), Matt, someone else) does so and comes to a conclusion about the effect, it remains a possibility that that is the change that is causing what you're seeing.
    • The previous switchover point was 501mv. The stock value is like ~360. They now were idling at about ~880. The thing is, most people get a false lean condition. I am getting false rich conditions. This isn't a quirk of terminology, most cam upgraders get awful fuel economy because the O2's read false lean and add fuel - Mine are attempting to aggressively subtract fuel.
    • So... the whole idea was to upgrade the power of the motor from stock. The motor I bought with the gearbox had 'some' stuff done to it in the past, but it wasn't as well thought out/what I had wanted to do. The stock heads typically are a big restriction on LS's and need porting to unlock quite a lot of power. You can then go a bit silly with aftermarket castings to get more, aftermarket intake manifolds for a little more, and then porting those for more. <- We are here. Nobody in Australia really goes down this path (for some reason). It might* make 3kw or something more than doing things the tried and true path for 10X the cost. So that's probably why - I wouldn't even recommend it to people, the money was and is likely better spent on just CNC'ing the stock heads and putting a 6.3L stroker kit in. I didn't want to go down the 'normal' path and then think: But if I'd just done a bit more - I could have had a slightly better result. I assumed the heads were running out of flow and it always annoyed me - Turns out the previous installer advanced the cam 6 degrees so this is likely why it was coming on earlier and running out of puff earlier than advertised. The body panels were just lack of planning/no information on this anywhere on the internet and the fact they came out different was annoying. From test fitting the guard it appears I could have gotten away with GTR guards only, but I got the bonnet and raisers and everything else as well for a pretty decent package deal.
×
×
  • Create New...