Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Fair bit of talk about the ethanol content in the pump fuel available (united, caltex etc).

There are plenty of people that have spent the money on content analysers, but plenty who haven't.
I thought it would be useful for those that don't have the analysers to have a place to come to check recent fuel batch quality.


So, just tell us when you bought the fuel, where and the ethanol content you're seeing. Don't write about fuel you bought last year, just recent examples. I hope for this to be a regularly updated thread.

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/429109-pump-e85-current-ethanol-content/
Share on other sites

This thread will be pretty useless as Caltex Eflex is pretty consistant at 70-72 with nearly no variation and i believe United is sitting steady at 85.

/thread.

well piggaz has seen 77 up to about 87 at united servo at rozelle. I'm not a tuner, but suspect that if your car is tuned on e85 and your buying e77 fuel (or potentially worse) then you could run into some problems.

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

well piggaz has seen 77 up to about 87 at united servo at rozelle. I'm not a tuner, but suspect that if your car is tuned on e85 and your buying e77 fuel (or potentially worse) then you could run into some problems.

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

Maybe the marine grade for boats is different :P

  • Like 1

A friend of mine cracked all 6 pistons recently because of a bad batch of E85.. Apparently the content changes with the weather.. For example if you car was tuned in summer it would have been tuned with a higher ethanol content because in winter they add more pump fuel because the ethanol does not vaporize as easily in the cold..

Just what I have been told I'm not a scientist or anything..

A friend of mine cracked all 6 pistons recently because of a bad batch of E85.. Apparently the content changes with the weather.. For example if you car was tuned in summer it would have been tuned with a higher ethanol content because in winter they add more pump fuel because the ethanol does not vaporize as easily in the cold..

Just what I have been told I'm not a scientist or anything..

Sounds more like a bad tune or some other form of failure! E85 has not been known to cause any major issues without there being an outside influence of some form!

Like I said.. I have no clue just what I've been told.. I'm not on E85 just yet but with pump fuel going to $1.80/L I think it's time to invest.

I know, its just comments like that from your mate that give people the wrong idea about Ethanol, there are so many cars running it daily and/or running it under extreme conditions with big power output and having no issues, there are some big $ and high HP cars running it with no issues, these are not the sort of builds you would expect people to run the risk of a dodgy fuel on.

Given that we know that once you get the ethanol content up above about 40% you gain pretty much all the cooling and det resistance benefits of 85% ethanol, and given that we know that even the most variable stuff doesn't anywhere near <50%, surely there is room here to debunk the myths?

The other way to look at it is that as the ethanol % falls from some high value (say you tuned at a true E85) down to a low % (say it bottoms out at 60%) then the true amount of fuel is so very very high that the exhaust temps will still be low and the car will in fact struggle to make power. Instead it will make lots of black smoke.

You are more at risk of tuning it at the ragged edge (if you can find it) at E70 and then getting some true E85 into it and running a bit lean. Then you might get into some grief.

I know, its just comments like that from your mate that give people the wrong idea about Ethanol, there are so many cars running it daily and/or running it under extreme conditions with big power output and having no issues, there are some big $ and high HP cars running it with no issues, these are not the sort of builds you would expect people to run the risk of a dodgy fuel on.

This is running a straight E85 tune.. No flex sensor yet.. Might have caused it to lean out also..

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

I'd have to disagree with that. United are pretty spot on, from what I've seen. Caltex seems to vary just that little bit more than United.

Either way, just pull back the tune a bee's dick. When I was running the PFC/united tune, I ran Caltex in it and had no problems. That includes giving the car a flogging at hill climbs.

Ive been running pump e85 for last 3 years in my drift car and had it tuned for caltex and have switched between united and caltex on same tune and have had no worries engine still going as strong as ever, all comes down to how well its tuned to compensate for the changes.

I'd have to disagree with that. United are pretty spot on, from what I've seen. Caltex seems to vary just that little bit more than United.

Either way, just pull back the tune a bee's dick. When I was running the PFC/united tune, I ran Caltex in it and had no problems. That includes giving the car a flogging at hill climbs.

I've had a consistant reading the whole time!

This was early on in the piece though, a few years ago. My car was off the road for a while there also. Maybe they have picked up their game?

Mine has been over the past 14-15 mths i think! So possibly?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...