Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well piggaz has seen 77 up to about 87 at united servo at rozelle. I'm not a tuner, but suspect that if your car is tuned on e85 and your buying e77 fuel (or potentially worse) then you could run into some problems.

agreed...caltex consistent. More of an issue for united.

That's not how most tuners would tune, as that's not safe.

Safe tune, variation = no problem

We test daily UNITED is the only pump fuel we recommend (caltex is average). So much so that we dont use drum.

A tuner should tune any pump e85 car to be safe on any thing down to e70 (just in case you need to fill with caltex etc) as its a very minor change in tune.... and minimal loss in hp... very minimal

I love reading these threads and learning all this shit :) I wish I had the money for a flex tune and an ECU that could handle it.

At one stage I was even thinking just going ethanol but there is only like 2 servos that stock it here and none down the coast where I do a lot of travel

The GM sensor is available for under $100 delivered now, and with a Zietronics box should work on nearly any ecu, as long as you have a spare 0-5v input... Must speak to you about that soon Trent, I have an Emanage Ultimate to flex tune. ;)

Flex tuning will definitely be getting more common in the future. I need to fit a sensor to my Fcon but I am scared of the wiring nightmare in the dash. :unsure:

I love reading these threads and learning all this shit :) I wish I had the money for a flex tune and an ECU that could handle it.

At one stage I was even thinking just going ethanol but there is only like 2 servos that stock it here and none down the coast where I do a lot of travel

Lol I am full flex so I can use pump fuel but I love ethanol so much I carry jerries of it haha

i think what people are forgetting is that if your car is tuned on e85 and your next batch of fuel you run is 70% your car will run slightly richer then normal, there is no "running lean" or "cracking pistons" situation.

I'm the opposite, was tuned on 70 and now E85 is available near home, compensation is in the ECU but going to check it properly on dyno to be safe

Yeah but Simon's point more revolves around the fact of someone not having a sensor and so on - which comes back to a lot of other posts in this thread that are quite clear

If the tune is done safely for a street car, the variation from E70 ro E85 has no bearing.

Whilst this thread is a good idea - as long as the tune is OK - It's a non-issue

Nathan what if you are going on a car trip like 3 hours away for a weekend?

Jerry cans?

Yep got 3 large red plastic ones, whether it's a trip to Winton, or going away. One day I will change from the power fc and get a ecu that can do eflex with a ethanol sensor. It's not a problem at the moment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...