Jump to content
SAU Community

Nsw Backflips On P-Plate Turbo Ban


RiseofBrutality
 Share

Recommended Posts

Why not lift the ban? When it first came into effect, even Volvo pointed out the absurdity of it. Australian road policy makers give me the impression that they are very short sighted, very bored, very reactionary individuals.

Next get rid of the 80kmh limit for L platers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The generation of kids getting their license now don't have the same maturity as most of us did when we were that age. Yes there are some that are the exception.

Add power to the rides of P platers now who drive like complete retards is just not smart

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A couple of SQ5 Mum/Dad owners of wealth have been coached into buying those cars so that their sons can drive them.

Ian Luff has had more to say too.

An adjustment needs to be made but not a radical shift away from what's already in place.

More motor insurance companies should encourage advanced driving courses with some benefits at the 'end of the tunnel'.

But maybe there's too much commonsense in that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next get rid of the 80kmh limit for L platers.

Already happening

http://motoring.ninemsn.com.au/cars/news/8624964/new-l-plater-news-laws-2013-australia

Log books reduced from 120hrs to 80hrs as well, as long as proper driver training completed.

But RiseOfBrutality, you're spot on mate, there should DEFINITELY be mandatory driver training for new drivers (L / P plates). I attended I think around 6 defensive driver days and 2 advanced driver training days whilst on my L's / P's (My mum made me do it, as that was a compromise for owning a high powered RWD car on my Ps) and I cannot be more thankful for the experience it gave me. Genuinely believe it made me a better driver today.

Cheers,

Shaz

Edited by Shazbanger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree the 120hrs on your L's was a bit to much.

This is a good move

"A new Safer Drivers Course will be available to Learners from July and will involve both theoretical and practical coaching in driving habits. The five-hour course gives Learners 20 hours worth of credit to take off their 120-hour logbook total, a further 20 hours can be knocked off by taking 10 hours of professional driving lessons."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's going to be a brave, brave p plater who faces the streets in a S13/R32 in the current climate of vehicle policing.

Really doubt that'll stop the majority of those who want one, and have wanted one since on their Ls, or have grown up wanting one! How many p-platers have we seen on here post a thread about their turbo r32/33/34? Sure, not a LOT but most of them probably just keep their heads down and away from attention like that. Legalising this, i think, is absolutely stupid without a cap on the power (I don't think i read that there was a cap, only the power/ratio limit).

Someone, tell me am I missing any positive points of this change (in relation to lifting the ban)? I definitely like the driver training + reduced hours bits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone, tell me am I missing any positive points of this change (in relation to lifting the ban)? I definitely like the driver training + reduced hours bits.

I'm with you Chris

Other than the driver training + reduced hours I don't see this ending well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If its anything like the LAMS for bikes, any approved bike >260cc cannot be modified for extra power.

Going to be interesting how it plays out.

Prices of NA silvias and Skyrines are sure going to drop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still on my green P's, in QLD, I bought an r32 gtst. Got caught the following Christmas Day and took all my points bar 1..

Fair enough, I broke the law and payed for it.

But what pisses me off the most is my d*ckhead mates get pulled over all the time and nothing happens.. (Same thing P's and turbo + driving like idiots)

I just don't understand what this law is going to achieve? More deaths and idiots on there P's (I know not everyone is a hoon)

I was not driving like an idiot believe it or not.. Rather stay off boost with an external gate and a laggy T04E

Edited by Zrobe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whilst I do agree that the laws should have been on a power:weight ration right from the start instead of a blanket ban I cant see this ending well.

Whilst "engine modifications" may not exactly be legal for them there is nothing stopping a young would be driver chucking in a ecu, adding some boost to their low mount and accompany that with some e85 and you now have a 17 year old in a 230rwkw sub 1200kg S-chasis - and the best part of it all is that it would cost him the same price if not cheaper than buying a sh*tty N/A CA or SR equivelant and as far as police are concerned its only got "an exhaust on it".

Can definately see this leading to more accidents not less. There is ample amount of young drivers at the moment who are driving and paying the SAME price if not more for the inferior N/A equivelant simply because they are not allowed to drive a turbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Drivers with no experience are going to crash anything they steer, it is proper driver training and common sense that will prevent it, not so much the car.... The quality of driving from those with the nice fresh looking Red P plates is nothing short of a shit sandwhich! It really makes me wonder how and why they passed the test.

It doesnt matter what we say or do, this will always be an issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dont think it will have a positive feedback. But these days you have these young kids killing themselves in anything from mums excel to a commadore or falcon. As stated above doesnt matter what car its the ability of the driver that matters. I mean i owned an 82 gemini as my first car and still got done for bournouts one night, and an N/A TX3 got done street racing with a mate. So yes we were all young and silly mind you we only did ali G style speed limit racing but still silly.

Now i drive a nice 33 and do plenty of track days ect. This is where it needs to be done and mandatory driving skill days would be perfect. Main problem for P platers is that a $240 track day plus $50 license plus fuel is a little expensive and out of reach for your average burger flipper.

Education is the key. But guess governments have bigger issues to deal with these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont see it making THAT much of a difference.

you all keep saying they're going to kill themselves.

the power/weight ratio is there for a reason.

those who modify the cars, are those who would have gone out and bought a faster NA otherwise.

what I CAN see happening, is more people being pulled over, and getting defected, so the car has to have a proper inspection.

when I was on my ps, I had a hq statesmen, with a 308, that was slower than a v6 vn commodore.

my 2c.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This law only affects me picking up lowies. From being the cool dude in a sports car to an old guy in mid life crisis. May have to go back to paying for sex rather than buying maccas drive through.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This law only affects me picking up lowies. From being the cool dude in a sports car to an old guy in mid life crisis. May have to go back to paying for sex rather than buying maccas drive through.

ROFL!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I am impressed with all this level of adjustment. I didn't expect all this possibility
    • Correct.  In the case of the 500kw dyno plot I showed you the car actually runs two boost control solenoids for boost control and a 5psi wastegate spring.  It allows me to control how much boost pressure is applied to both sides of the wastegate valve at any point and fairly accurately control boost target as a result. I've tuned it so that it's able to target anywhere from 5psi to 25psi depending on what's needed.  The target tables I've set up in that car are Gear vs RPM, so every gear has potential for a different boost (and torque) curve.   First and second gear have quite low boost targets, third gear actually has different target boost all the way through the rpm range as it's a stock RB25 gearbox - the boost targets have been chosen to maintain a peak of 600nm (what the owner has set as the maximum torque he's happy with putting through the stock 3rd gear) but it carries that to the rev limiter.   The boost curve to achieve that is something of a ramp up, then hold, then ramp up again and the power curve looks more like a flat line haha.  
    • so you can decrease or increase the boost depending on the diet as you wish?     by acting on the wastegate?
    • That's torque and power, it's all from a single run.  The boost curve is "held back" from it's peak target in the 3500rpm to 5000rpm range from memory, so it ramps hard to something like 18psi then climbs more progressively to 23psi nearer 5000rpm.   It makes the torque (and power) ramp more "natural" and less hard on parts and traction, it doesn't feel artificially held back.   
    • Here's the torque curves from the car I ramped boost up later in the rpm to allow a slightly wider useful power curve - the power curve is a bit weird shaped also thanks to the TVIS (or whatever they call it with the 4EFTE in this Starlet) which changes the volume of the intake manifold throughout the rpm range, but you can see that the green power curve actually holds later on with the extra boost... but looks almost more like the kind of thing you'd expect from a cam or exhaust change
×
×
  • Create New...