Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, new member here, long long long time lurker (reading but not posting).

We're in the midst of an RB25DET NEO build for an S14 (240SX) and I am running into an issue...

The engine we have is from an R34 GT-T and when we pulled the stock damper off, it kinda fell apart. So we need to buy a new one, but I'm trying to understand why RB26 spec units are half the price of an RB25 spec unit, and also to understand which version I really need for a NEO engine.

One piece of information I have found indicates it's the crank snout difference between the RB25 and 26, but I've also read that the NEO has the same specs as the 26 in that respect...

Does anyone here have any other information on what is different and why we should pay double the cost for a 25-spec unit?

TY!

supply on demand... more demand for a 25 balancer i guess?

also you will find the power steering belt is different on the 25 to the 26.

Yes I understand the economic reasons for price differences... :P

I'm asking if there is a mechanical or functional difference between parts made for the 25 vs the 26.

IE, why couldn't I use a 26 instead of a 25? :)

It's a good question, as for the sake of a new belt it would still save money running the cheaper balancer. Not sure what the differences are myself, but I have a neo balancer on my rb30 crank.

Really depends if it under-drives or over-drives. I'm not sure if you can use the power steering pump off a GTR and it will work fine. I got my Ross Balancer for a touch over $600 which wasnt to bad

Thanks for the replies, all.

I should say, we are planning on putting an N1 RB26 crank into the engine, so I know that the 26 dampers will mount to the crank..

I was mostly worried about belt positioning, ie, the distance between the block and the accessory drive pulleys, being different.

If the only issue is belt length, well, that's not really an issue, we can figure out what length of belt is needed. :)

Anyone have any input on using a 26 damper on a 25, aside from belt length concerns?

TY!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
×
×
  • Create New...