Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Heey i bougt a Bee-r from a well known trader here but i think it looks different then the regular bee-r limiters on pictures.

First thing what looks different is where the cables are coming out second is the cable which looks thinner

What do you guys think? Already mailed bee-r but they arent responding.

post-105921-0-48938500-1377863956_thumb.jpg

post-105921-0-43477700-1377863979_thumb.jpg

post-105921-0-78052300-1377863999_thumb.jpg

post-105921-0-88923300-1377864012_thumb.jpg

Edited by f5twister
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/431079-is-this-bee-r-revlimitter-fake/
Share on other sites

from the pics it def looks like a knock off. Way different to mine.

1. Those loop lines are way too long

2. no heat shrink on those loop lines

just as a start but thats just my opinion. I got mine directly from jap land but not aware of any changes to the model.

see attached

post-2127-0-87900400-1377898635_thumb.jpg

Lol doesnt harm engine as much as stock limiter as long as gain isnt on the big bangs and overuse it

But please stay ontopic

So what's the point in having it?

Use your foot and brain and buy something useful for your car.

Total waste of money!

So what's the point in having it?

Use your foot and brain and buy something useful for your car.

Total waste of money!

Agreed

It all looks the same as some photos on google...

bee-r-racing-rev-limiter-model-30175-2-l

And it also looks like there are slight changes between them.

so youre saying that everyone with launchcontrol is a ricer and wants to get noticed ?

First of all these limiters are safer for a engine you can install les revss and you have no fuell cutt duo to cutting the spark signal,

thats why unburnt fuel detonates in the elbow, but as i said it would be fine if you dont turn gain up to high which some people do because they like they bang bang indeed and yes high gain and overuse can damage the engine but i said that my plans where not to use a high gain, so please stop bashing the limiter now and my choice to buy one its my car and my money Mkay?

Edited by f5twister
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...