Jump to content
SAU Community

Mugabetown - Whoretownin' At It's Worst.


t5iv
 Share

Recommended Posts

You can photocopy whatever you want mate.............at the end of the day it will all come down to the integrity of the individual / business being reviewed....................they will profile you based upon the information you furnish to them and that will give them lead indicators on what is credible and what is not.

CSI is baiscally coming to reality guys.

Guys like me are fuarked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soooooooo..........dividend access shares come at me.

well that's what our lawyer just advised as an alternative structuring arrangement...............I can already see the reaction from my clients........something like this

post-5053-13922665672597_thumb.jpg

Antz brain will have to resolve it...........again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soooooooo..........dividend access shares come at me.

well that's what our lawyer just advised as an alternative structuring arrangement...............I can already see the reaction from my clients........something like this

attachicon.gifImageUploadedBySAU Community1392266565.662205.jpg

Antz brain will have to resolve it...........again

dafuq? Why?! Can think of a few obscure situations where that could be a vaguely conceivable option...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those playing at home:

Private companies with accumulated profits may issue a new class of shares to associates of the ordinary shareholders of the private company. These new classes of shares are created and often issued for nominal consideration. They do not carry any voting rights but usually carry the opportunity to receive dividends.

Subsequently, when the accumulated profits of the private company are distributed to the new shareholders, the tax paid is often substantially less than what would have been recognised in the hands of the original shareholders.

Although private companies and their advisors may have a commercial rationale for creating such arrangements i.e. asset protection, estate planning or as a performance incentive mechanism for personnel, the Commissioner will be checking to ensure these arrangements have not been set up for a tax avoidance purpose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dafuq? Why?! Can think of a few obscure situations where that could be a vaguely conceivable option...
exactly! Plus my clients will not see the value in this and will crystalise unwanted tax implications.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those playing at home:

Private companies with accumulated profits may issue a new class of shares to associates of the ordinary shareholders of the private company. These new classes of shares are created and often issued for nominal consideration. They do not carry any voting rights but usually carry the opportunity to receive dividends.

Subsequently, when the accumulated profits of the private company are distributed to the new shareholders, the tax paid is often substantially less than what would have been recognised in the hands of the original shareholders.

Although private companies and their advisors may have a commercial rationale for creating such arrangements i.e. asset protection, estate planning or as a performance incentive mechanism for personnel, the Commissioner will be checking to ensure these arrangements have not been set up for a tax avoidance purpose.

straight off the ATO website nice one Tony. This ^ is also why this option may not be a viable one..........as the level of audit risk is significant and although would not benefit a tax advantage it from it, it would create unrecoverable time charged............for something the client would not understand.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Latest Posts

    • Little more work!  Did some body work on the rear wheel arches and since the paint was a cheap spray job before figured I’d do something to tide me over until I wrap the car.    Colour might not be everyone’s choice but I like it and it’s only temporary, just hate having primer from the wheel arches standing out.    Keeping an eye out for a decent set of wheels to throw on now. Wheels and tires on the car are junk
    • Its likely to be 70% road 30% track usage, track usage will increase if anything. Decided not to fit it as I cant be arsed changing the bushes on my LCAs again 🤣 I did get the below back from GKTech though so they should work together     The anti-squat kit and roll center adjusters work independently since they change the rear lower control arm's angle in different ways. The anti-squat kit adjusts the angle from front to back, which impacts anti-squat values. Roll center adjusters change the angle side to side, mainly to correct geometry on cars that are significantly lowered. They might affect each other a tiny bit, but overall, you can think of them as separate.
    • What are you doing with the car? street car or race car? People get hung up on the squat of the s/r chassis rears. There is positives to the squat if a car is setup and driven correctly for it (correct ride height, spring rate, alignment, damper valving). Generally just lengthen the rear traction arm by 5-10mm and that will help the squat and bump steer too. You are also correct with the roll centre too. This too also needs to be adjustable if you start messing with suspension geometry.   Having done quiet a bit of testing on race cars this year in regards to rear squat, I've seen some big positives from it in regards to drive off corners and traction. 
    • I find I am using the MX5 for everything except long overnight cruises with Jackie, or, if picking up the kids to go somewhere, the SS has so much more room inside, and is much more comfortable if your going to be doing Hwy driving for 6-8 hours And the MX5 isn't bad in stop go traffic for a manual transmission car, whilst the clutch kit has been upgraded from stock, it is still light, and also not having a stupidly light flywheel in it helps as well, I've spent alot of time sitting on the M5, M4 and M7 stuck in traffic when plodding around the Greater Sydney Region in it Another benefit is MX5's are not really a car that gets stolen, you can pretty much park it anywhere, and it will still be there when you return
    • I can totally get why you like it for that sort of commute. I was thinking BoganDore because it's such a lazy drive, for things like stop start traffic.   I used to do over an hour in stop start shit from one side of Bris to the next, twice a day. My choice of car was larger displacement, with an auto. Basically for torque in low rpm/very low speed, and no clutch pedal. But loved a fun manual for the weekends, which the partner has (plus had the LandCruiser too for other fun drives). I now have an EV as a work car, and I tell ya what, ultimate daily driver, especially if youre out of energy, like I often am after work. I don't even need to touch the brake pedal   That said, I'm presently rebuilding the Liberty GTB to get it setup for weekend drives and track abuse! So small high revving turbo engine with 6 speed cog swapper!   But for your style of commute, I'd probably take the MX5 too!   For those choices, I'm ignoring fuel economy. Because I know how atrocious V8 daily life is for fuel from when I used to daily a manual SS, ha ha. Hence why I know I love the daily rumble of a V8
×
×
  • Create New...