Jump to content
SAU Community

Happy Laps - Queensland Raceway 27-10-13


Recommended Posts

which is utter bollocks.......30 at lakeside is just stupid IMO

QR set the minimum of 30 because their insurance hit them with a massive premium increase after some things that were said on another forum that their insurance saw, so now QR need to make more money off happy laps.

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So are we ever going to go back to Lakeside? I would personally be happy to pay a bit more to go there (increase the charge to cover 30 cars if say only 20 show up). I find it a much nicer area, better track and just generally more enjoyable.

So are we ever going to go back to Lakeside? I would personally be happy to pay a bit more to go there (increase the charge to cover 30 cars if say only 20 show up). I find it a much nicer area, better track and just generally more enjoyable.

Yes we are planning to still run LP happy laps we just ran out of time to get the numbers for that session.

It wasn't just the issues with a certain other club that caused the hike, the death at Lakeside recently combined with the number of cars being written off has added to it as well. Try telling an insurance company that you want to have 25-35 drivers on track at the same time, most with little to no experience and no one will be wearing a helmet.

And for finalisation of the debate a few of us were having re: Happy laps and insurance -

"You are not covered If your car was being used or tested in or for a race, trial, test or contest or on a competition circuit, course or arena." From Just Car.

"You are not covered If your car was being used or tested in or for a race, trial, test or contest or on a competition circuit, course or arena." From Just Car.

Anyonw who thought they were covered by their insurance on track are kidding themselves to start with.

The issue and debate rested on how QR were now promoting the events. The argument was basically we are traveling no faster than road speeds, and it is NOT racing of any sort, how is it different to writing it off in a car park.

The issue and debate rested on how QR were now promoting the events. The argument was basically we are traveling no faster than road speeds, and it is NOT racing of any sort, how is it different to writing it off in a car park. 

This is a very valid point.

pretty arguable. however insurance companies dont pay if its in a private carpark either. Its usually bump for bump.

that arguement would come down to whose got the biggest lawyer,......insurance would win for sure

QR set the minimum of 30 because their insurance hit them with a massive premium increase after some things that were said on another forum that their insurance saw, so now QR need to make more money off happy laps.

Also coincides with the massive influx in Downshift laps, and the huge money they bring in. Compared to our 12 cars and breakfast, QR is still a business.

So are we ever going to go back to Lakeside? I would personally be happy to pay a bit more to go there (increase the charge to cover 30 cars if say only 20 show up). I find it a much nicer area, better track and just generally more enjoyable.

THIS!

pretty arguable. however insurance companies dont pay if its in a private carpark either. Its usually bump for bump.

that arguement would come down to whose got the biggest lawyer,......insurance would win for sure

and this is also true. Even race car insurance doesnt cover your car on track. just for transport and storage basically.

What ever happened to the waiver?,this problem could be easily solved if everone had to sign a waiver stating that they understand that motor sport can be dangerous and that one would be held accountable in the case of any unforseen accidents,injuries or death that may occur at this event.That way the insurance companies dictatorship is reduced and everone can get back some sort of enjoyment,dont understand why evertime something unfortunate happens all anyone wants to do is make things more difficult than it has to be.You dont need to kill an ant with a sledge hammer do you?,just a thought.

Waivers don't hold a lot of water in court all that often unfortunately :(

Basically there needs to be some form of bargaining equality and sufficient consideration for a waiver to be upheld in circumstances like this, otherwise the courts have a long history of dismissing the waiver. This is particularly true where it can be argued that the waiver is an attempt to remove liability in the case of negligence. The argument would be structured that it was negligent of QR to allow people with no safety equipment, no vehicle scrutineering and no proper driver briefing out on track to go hell for leather.

understand what your saying,its a pity that ever year that goes pass your able to do less and less,and if theres anything that makes you happy and enjoy doing seems to come with a price tag attached,we are now so absorted with red tape that all its doing is creating a world full of people that get so sick of stupid dictatorship that they just give up on there dreams and just conform,since no matter what you try and do,they just screw you over anyway.At least ive got my memories of a better time and place where you could have fun without such crap,feel sorry for the youth today as this is all they know,and cant enjoy life like ive been fortuanate to have done.I know that this wont make any difference,but feels better to vent fustrations sometimes.

hang on 50 bucks ( or 35 ) for passengers too..... :- /

For non members yes, we run these events primarily for members but welcome non members to come out and have a look.

:-/

might stick to down shift happy laps ...100 buck is a bit steep

DS charges $60 for a driver and $20 for a passenger. $80 for two.

Ours is $50 and $50. So yes, if you bring a passenger is more exxy.

However, if you're a member, it's a $10 saving on this and about $25 saving on sprints.

If you aren't bringing a passenger and are not a member, you're still saving $10 with us.

If you are a member, you're saving $25.

Being a cams affiliated club, we provide benefits for members primarily. Our members get discounts at companies small and large. Chris, one of the best auto Leckys in Australia, offers official club members serious discounts. Also, we get regular discounts at companies like repco. This weekend members, if they've applied for the appropriate program, get 30% off!

Need more reasons? ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's one I help build and tuned a decade ago, Garrett  GTX3071R Gen 1, T3 twin scroll 0.83 rear housing. Went from larger 272 cams down to smaller Tomei Poncams to help with the low end. S13 non VCT motor. Car was purpose built for the track, hence low down was the focus. Note the actual dyno chart shows lower boost, however the EBC and boost gauge showed 1.9Bar (Ignore the torque, I was young and didn't know how to set derived torque)  
    • I’m doing some side developments on SR20det S13 engines, its one my hobby cars used it to compare flow capacity of some smaller size wheels. SR20det is one of another JDM legendary engines I'm sure there are plenty of SR enthusiasts on this forum, I will share results some common turbo configurations here. a quick run down of what the car is: Wide body 180sx Type X with black top engine (blue). It has: Stock bottom end Haltech 1500 ECU 5-0 motorsports trigger kit Kelford SR20DET Beehive Spring with Titanium Retainers Kelford Cams SR20DET S13 188-B 268/272 Cams G25-660 Turbocharger in T2 .64 rear housing internally gated ARP Head studs MLS head gasket 1000CC ID injectors Walbro 450L Fuel pump Front mount cooler kit JJR’s 3 inches turbo back exhaust (its too short for the 180sx it had to be extended) Pump 98 fuel Hub Dyno tune So far made 270rwkws at 22psi full boost by 4500RPM. Engine is very knock limited hence a pretty bad looking top end. From previous experiences it seems like SR20dets are happier with bigger size turbine, some thing like a GT30 would make way better top end, but on same time response is lost. It won't be a problem with S15 VCT engines. I'll be testing alternative turbine housing, turbine wheel and possibly dump pipe options for extra flow to resolve the problem and of course E85 would resolve all the issues.            
    • Awesome writeup and details. Thanks for sharing the story so far. I can relate to parts of it with my previous car and some of the issues I had to deal with.
    • Wow the colour matched hard top completely transforms the car. Are there any nice front lip options for the car or is that off the table?
    • Generally yes but for some reason I've been ruthless this time around!  I might even need to do another tip run after the way I've finally been able to hit the delete button on shit I've stepped over, stepped around and tripped over for the past 10 years!
×
×
  • Create New...