Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

went in to get pink slip today, and was told the inner part of my front tyres were completely bald. I didn't even realise because it's not on the showing side, and I was told it was due to the camber on it.

I bought 2 new tyres and chucked them on to get my pinks approved, but was advised to get camber kits to fix the wear.

I'm not very knowledgeable in this area and thought it would be quicker to ask.

I've dropped my car a while ago with king springs (i think ultra low?) and the final measurement done by the workshop for camber was:

left: -2º08'

right: -2º16'

individual toe (both left and right): +0.8mm

setback: +0º07'

Wondering if camber kits is the way to go to fix up the wear, and if so, what is a reliable brand to go with?

:sweat:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/431951-how-to-fix-my-camber/
Share on other sites

What car do you have?

Are the figures on camber you gave for the rear or front?

what suspension do you have? Typically everyone has a coilovers with top hats to adjust camber at the front and rear camber arms for the rear.

Ideal camber front and rear for spirited road and light track is -2 all round anyways.

Wow I didn't know you can get that much negative camber from height drop. You might have aftermarket arms (have a look).

-2deg is the most you would want to run on the street. You can add more toe in for more contact patch. But if you're daily driving it, better off bringing it out to -1.5

Have a look here: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/409304-installing-front-camber-arms-and-radius-rods-r34/

Legendary,

Ideal camber is not -2°. If you have that and spend a reasonable proportion of time driving straight, you will wear out the inside edges. IDEAL camber depends on the usage model of the car. -1 to -1.5° is a more sensible amount for a typical streeter. If your "typical" actually means "flogged through the hills 90% of the time" then 2° will work well.

Furthermore, Skylines do not have front camber adjustment via strut tops because they do not have MacPherson strut suspension. Regardless of what it looks like, they do in fact need upper arm adjustment to gain camber adjustment.

suwidji,

Adjustable length upper arms that have rose joints on the end are not street legal. So if roadworthies are a concern for you do not consider them. Also do not consider cheap ones of these anyway, as they are crap. Sadly that means spending up big on some decent ones if you're going to use them.

Adjustable length uppers with rubber (or poly) bushes on the end are legal, although you may still get an argument from a dumb cop or a stupid inspector. It's not the adjustable length that's a problem, it's the rose joints that are not legal, but the rule gets misinterpreted.

The only almost completely invisible no legal trouble option is eccentric poly bushes for the existing arms, but they only offer a small range of adjustment. Still, it should be enough to dial out half a degree of camber, which should help.

GTSBoy,

Thanks for the info. In hindsight almost every car I owned was macpherson strut so just naturally assumed.

With the ideal camber, I had Toyo R1R's, Proxes 4 and Goodyear F1's all on -2 degree all round, and I did not see any camber wear on the inside. Hence my comment.

I had -1 to all around before and the car felt unwilling when I came into a corner (normally). Each to there own.

Legendary,

Ideal camber is not -2°. If you have that and spend a reasonable proportion of time driving straight, you will wear out the inside edges. IDEAL camber depends on the usage model of the car. -1 to -1.5° is a more sensible amount for a typical streeter. If your "typical" actually means "flogged through the hills 90% of the time" then 2° will work well.

Furthermore, Skylines do not have front camber adjustment via strut tops because they do not have MacPherson strut suspension. Regardless of what it looks like, they do in fact need upper arm adjustment to gain camber adjustment.

lots of terms that i had to google lol, not familiar with suspension terms.

So what you're saying is, I won't need camber kit, but getting an aftermarket upper arm with poly bushes (or rubber) OR just getting eccentric poly bushes and replacing the ones on the current arms is the way to go?

& that's correct, i drive the car straight pretty much all the time, and the inside of the tyre was worn completely. So just a 0.5 or 1 degree adjustment would be sufficient to fix my tread wear?

Any recommendations to reliable brands for upper arms/eccentric poly bushes? Don't want to cheap out on this lol

Adjustable arms or eccentric bushes are both "camber kits". "Camber kit" is a bit of a crap term brought about by the shitful rear suspension on early IRS Commodores that needed a kit to fix the 1970's geometry. Adjustable length arms are a somewhat more aggressive "fix" to the problem. Eccentric bushes are essentially the same thing as the "camber kit" for Commodores.

I don't know if pulling back to 1.5° will be enough to "fix" your camber wear, but it will certainly alleviate it. You'll get more miles out of the tyres. That really really depends on exactly how the car gets used. I have somewhere between 1 - 1.5 on my car and I don't see any noticable camber wear by the time the tyres get shifted to the rear of the car. They then proceed to get raped to the canvas at the rear anyway. I drive most of my miles just commuting to work, but I make it work hard in every corner I can, so my usage may be different enough to yours that the results will be different.

-2° front and -1.5° rear on my car. Front obviously wear the inside but the rears wears down evenly. If you like to push it a bit around corners (as I like to do) then -1.5° should be fine. If you're just putting around in your car then -1° is about as much as you want to run. Note that toe can also affect wear patterns.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The nature of my commute has changed. Way back then it was traffic lights all the way, for ~28km. It sucked. When they finally stitched the expressway together I can do a good 15+km of it at a steady 80-100 with no stopping. That alone has gotten me down to flat 10s. Prior to that it was mid-high 10s. I can't remember the delta that I saw when I got the idle down. It was only ~150 rpm, because the idle speed was never terrible, but for the delta in consumption to be noticeable it would have had to have been at least 0.2-0.3 L/100km - which is not to be sneezed at when it comes for absolute free.
    • If you're claiming the issues are not skyline specific, then either the USA is living in the 90s / early 2000s, OR you have the issue of "survivor bias". Which is you're mainly hearing and listening to those with terrible experiences, and haven't found the guys who have cars with good decent builds and no problems. It happens in AU too, that plenty of people keep having issues, and they keep going to the workshops that are known to be shit "because I read on the internet". Even worse, are those who keep posting on the internet as though they know for a fact what something is, when they've never touched/looked at said item in their life, and again are making assumptions, based on something they read, or because it's a certain way in other cars. It's even funnier when those same people debate the facts with the people who've lived and breathed this stuff for over 15 years. Example, I've had someone tell me you can't do something with a Skyline, because they read it on the internet, except I can tell they're wrong, as I did that exact thing back in 2008 with my Skyline.
    • The funniest part I saw, was someone would bitch and moan on FB about something, Andy would be the one to respond, asking for more info, if he could contact them, what the engine setup is, what their config file was, and 95% of the responses were people just going "der! It doesn't work" and Andy going "What doesn't work?" And then going "The firmware!" And they'd go around in circles as no one could ever give information, and Haltech couldn't fault things on the bench, (especially when people wouldn't give any specifics).   Many moons ago, when Andy was back at e420c stage, he reached out to me, and asked me to test different plug and play looms for him (already had an e420c in the car on his V1 PNP loom). And he kept asking me, as I was competent enough to be able to give him some specific feedback on what was/wasn't working, how to replicate the faults etc, and work through things with him. Most people are terrible at answering the questions they're asked, or being able to provide quality feedback other than "it doesn't work".
    • I say it often, none of this stuff is really Skyline-specific per se. But in general there's not a lot of people who actually know what they're doing. A lot of people charging like they do. Agile software development probably isn't the greatest idea for an engine controller.
    • Incidentally, I also put v3 of the tune on the car and did an oil change from 5w20 to 5w40 to see how it affected oil pressure in the mid to high end. I'm still happier with the thicker oil and will stick with it, but clearly the system is happy with 55psi even if I'm not! It's well within the service manual specs...but they are very open
×
×
  • Create New...