Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How does a 300ZX Twin Turbo compare to a R33 GTS-T? Considering wether its worth it to buy and modify it to hit the 300kw's.. If the RB30/25 is a torque monster can the 300zx be similar with similar, what im after is a fairly cheap reliable 300kw for the street and thinking of doing Injectors,computer,Eflex and 18psi on stock turbo's to get close to 300kw if I bought one.. At this power level with the R33 it was frying second gear and a handful, could I expect the same with a 300zx??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/432767-300zx-tt-potential/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

ok well assuming it has good turbo's and we don't need to remove the engine, what potential does it have with ( stock turbo's apparently are garrett) to make over 250kw with E85 and say 18psi??

would it be a push in the seat experience or lacking????

There has been a few good ones in magazines over the years, one owner took out the intercoolers and used water injection to cool the intake charge

Got rid of the intercooler piping and really neatened up the bay no end

massive money and effort to modify with lots of problems and troubleshooting along the way.

does it have a computer or FMIC yet? turbo back exhaust etc etc? boost control? injectors for the juice too?

otherwise they are an old car like RB's so also consider the usual suspects of fuel pump

Also they suffer from a lot of wiring faults and oil leaks due to the restricted space in the engine bay often meaning required maintenance of require things doesn't get done as too expensive/hard to work on. Also that tight fit means higher under-bonnet temps.

Any medium to major work is the standard 'engine out' too.

I loved the look and the potential performance of them and always wanted one. Did my research, decided against and here I am a happy RB owner :)

ah good old fashioned internet advise from non owners, they're as reliable as any other 20 year old car, it just comes down to making sure you do the proper maintenance. Make sure the cooling system is in good working order & don't skip fluid/filter changes, make sure the 100k km service is done & worth doing a plenum pull. Simple common sense stuff.

Jump onto aus300zx.com & have a bit of a read up there for all your answers

LOL, this is gold.

You don't have to take the engine out to work on them, if you want to change the turbo's then sure, the engine coming out is the easiest way, but apart from that they're no different to any other V6.

I pulled the head off a kia sorento recently and there's no more room in one of those...

Mine has 360 RWKW and I daily it. It's a slicktop 2 seater version so it's lighter and shorter than the others. It's actually smaller than a 180sx or a skyline. They are a FANTASTIC drivers car. They handle well and the build quality surpasses that of other nissans of the same vintage (not that that's really important when buying a sports car)...

Here's mine:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/431749-360rwkw480-rwhp-z32-slicktop/

ok well assuming it has good turbo's and we don't need to remove the engine, what potential does it have with ( stock turbo's apparently are garrett) to make over 250kw with E85 and say 18psi??

would it be a push in the seat experience or lacking????

As far as potential, this is my car on low boost (only 16 PSI) and taking it very easy on the 1-2 change and easy on the throttle until 100kmh otherwise I just get too much wheel spin. It's a lot quicker on 22 psi and if I bury my foot, the needle just goes spastic.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=379020305557294&set=vb.100003479824447&type=3&theater

As far as potential, this is my car on low boost (only 16 PSI) and taking it very easy on the 1-2 change and easy on the throttle until 100kmh otherwise I just get too much wheel spin. It's a lot quicker on 22 psi and if I bury my foot, the needle just goes spastic.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=379020305557294&set=vb.100003479824447&type=3&theater

Nice results and looks very stock under the bonnet too, ive been in a NA and a couple of twin turbo's and they are very solid on the road compared to my gtst and feel like they're a quality vehicle. Still look pretty modern too and with those extra cubes would be good off boost with E85.

ah good old fashioned internet advise from non owners, they're as reliable as any other 20 year old car, it just comes down to making sure you do the proper maintenance. Make sure the cooling system is in good working order & don't skip fluid/filter changes, make sure the 100k km service is done & worth doing a plenum pull. Simple common sense stuff.

Jump onto aus300zx.com & have a bit of a read up there for all your answers

Yeah id be looking for a mature owner with good service history for sure, nice looking car for 20years old too

This thread is full of BS, crap they read on the net hahaha. AngryRB, a good condition stock turbo Z32 can make in excess of 250rwkw on 16PSI with 98 octane, mod for mod a ZX will DESTROY a GTSt, not even kidding. I know this as my family has owned and i have driven many variants of BOTH. No bias here, just plain facts, My NA ZX is on par with a stock/mild GTSt. Fair few guys are in the 11's on stock turbos with Z32's, including one here in aus doing 11.50's @ 117MPH on 98octane. Few in the US are doing 11.30's/11.40's at 121-124MPH with E85.

The potential is there, just the bad rep from lemons that haven't been taken care of stops people from buying them.

Edited by Super Drager

Just remember when looking at a 300zx is 90% of them have seeious electrical demons and most of the water hoses are perished and require replacing. They are also very light in the rear and have trouble with traction at standard power levels.

Also they are harder to work on then a gtst (won't say skyline cause the Gtr is a pain) and good ones may be harder to find

Im getting used to PITA setup's, the top feed rail on gtst is something id like to forget in future...

Just throwing idea's up at the moment, also considering a Toyota Prado 3.4L petrol for something different, looking for best bang for buck for under $10k..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...