Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I've finally decided to sell my 1997 R33 GTST after having it for nearly 8 years. Its been a great car to have and except for a few minor issues (coil packs / AFM) it has ticked along reliably - interior and exterior in very good condition. I'm in need of a more 'family friendly' car so the time has come to let her go. I took it into a local workshop last week to get a quote for a RWC. The following items were picked up and I was just wondering whether I'm being taken for a ride or whether the work and pricing seems OK.

Also if the below does seem really expensive, any recommendations on where I could take it without costing an arm and leg and get the RWC done? (I live south east of Melbourne).

Parts Labour Total
Caster Rod Bushes 80 150 $230.00
Resurface Headlamp 60 $60.00
RHF Shocker 260 99 $359.00
Rear Tyres 300 $300.00
Rocker Cover Gasket 90 160 $250.00
Front Tierods 80 50 $130.00
+ boot 10 $10.00
4 wheel alignment 90 $90.00
Rear tierod end 80 50 $130.00
Front Rotors 160 $160.00
Rear Rotors 160 $160.00
Rear pads 65 200 $265.00 *includes labour cost for rotors
Exhaust earth strap

* they said the rotors were 27.9mm on the front but needed to be 28mm and on the back are 15.8mm and need to be 16mm?

Total cost:$2144 + $150 for the actual RWC.

On top of that the radiator has just started to leak slightly from the top so I asked for a quote for replacement of that, the below was their quote:

Part: $350

Labour $150

Total $500

Total with radiator: $2794-

The car is pretty stock and comparative cars on carsales.com.au seem to be up for around $7500 - $9500 mark. I know that doesn't mean they are selling for that though necessarily.

Sorry for the long post....

Any thoughts are appreciated.

Cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/432895-rwc-items-r33-s2-gtst/
Share on other sites

Well, they are correct about rotor minimum thicknesses, but some of those prices are crazy! Replacing the rocker cover gaskets couldn't take longer than an hour of you had no clue, so the 160 labour they want to charge is nuts. Also the head light resurface? I have rubbed toothpaste on mine with a rag and they came up sweet, and recently used some Mcguires scratch x (for paint scratches) and my headlights look as new. also pretty weird to just replace one shocker.

Edited by superben

Hey,

Thanks all for the responses so far.

They did advise replacing both front shockers but purely for a road worth they said only the front right would need to be done. I've also heard of using toothpaste to shine up the lights, does this damage them though?

Anyone have recommendations on where to take it to have the work done?

Alternatively I could try and sell it without rego I suppose?

Cheers.

Well, they are correct about rotor minimum thicknesses, but some of those prices are crazy! Replacing the rocker cover gaskets couldn't take longer than an hour of you had no clue, so the 160 labour they want to charge is nuts. Also the head light resurface? I have rubbed toothpaste on mine with a rag and they came up sweet, and recently used some Mcguires scratch x (for paint scratches) and my headlights look as new. also pretty weird to just replace one shocker.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hey guys I’m chasing a Rb20det complete or bare block need a good running engine as mine has low comp 
    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
×
×
  • Create New...