Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, I've been planning on a 30/26. The 26 I have has factory bottom end and worked head making about 500hp with all the bolt on to do so.

I've been out on the track with it a couple of times and had no problems.

Motor and box are out at the moment to put a extended sump and oil head drain.

Bought the car being told the bottom end was fully built. When we took the sump off we discovered it is stock....

So do I just put the 26 back in or do I go a forged rb30/26? The car will be 90% track. Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/433110-to-3026-or-keep-the-26/
Share on other sites

If you're going to do it I wouldn't personally bother with a stock bottom end. Too low in comp. IF you're using it for track you'll want more comp to give you more stick out of the corners. Fine if you're using it for the strip as you can pump in more boostage.

Mate 370kws at the wheels is nothing to laugh at. If it's making good reliable power with good response as it is I'd leave it. One of the reasons I went 30/26 was to make the jump from low 300's to low 400's. For you the jump isn't as big (unless you have a fair crack at it) so that may help in the decision to stay with what you've got.

Put half of the money in to your current setup as a (proper) RB30 build will cost you and you've got a pretty amazing engine.

I'm with Shoota77

Measure your bores and if they are within tolerances put your engine back together with rings and bearings if necessary (or if you're keen a set of forged pistons and a balance) and it will probably go for years. I have an RB30 with a stock bottom end in my Stagea and it is heaps better than the original RB25 and really torquey but its not making 370awkw. You would want a fully forged and balanced RB30 to see a significant improvement on your RB26 and probably end up spending a minimum $10k or easily double that depending on how carried away you get. Your current setup sounds pretty good and you could fairly easily get a few more KW if you really want.

Hmmmm yeh. It is responsive as is. I just wonder how much more it can be with the 30 bottom. Sorry guys, this suggestion of keeping my existing engine has has thrown a spanner in the works and confused me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...