Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What you need is one of these:

IMG_0333.jpg

I had one of these CNCed to run a S15 turbo master cylinder, it makes it bolt straight on and the rod length is perfect, and the pedal feel is no different with my twin plate clutch, I have a Greddy Plenum and there is plenty of Room on my RB30

......RIPS now buys these off me for some of his builds.

If I had known you were selling them I would have considered this option. I looked at what you had done here on the GTR UK forum and decided that I wanted to keep the booster (in part because I was too lazy to move the brake booster to put in a billet adapter.

My solution was to use a smaller OD 5/8" clutch master cylinder, and then attack it with an 4" flapper disc to put a flat spot on it where it would have made contact with the greddy plenum. I have less of an interference issue to worry about too with my motor being 20mm taller than a rb26, not 38mm.

A last option would have been to make up a smaller billet clutch master cylinder. I started on that too but the above option was the easiest.

Point being were they similar sized turbo, which you say they are. I just find it hard to believe that with similar turbos the rb30 isnt faster, and has better acceleration out of corners than the rb26, are they both at same power levels?

Ive always wanted -5s on my rb30 what rpm do they make full boost?

Never said it wasn't faster of course it is with the turbos always on but the torque also needs a lot more throttle control out of very slow corners. Other than that through all the faster stuff the corner speed and exit is all to do with chassis and suspension, and tyres didn't matter 26 or 30.

But yes a big difference down low. Where you are pulling hard in 3rd you would be still be revving the 26 in 2nd.

Never said it wasn't faster of course it is with the turbos always on but the torque also needs a lot more throttle control out of very slow corners. Other than that through all the faster stuff the corner speed and exit is all to do with chassis and suspension, and tyres didn't matter 26 or 30.

But yes a big difference down low. Where you are pulling hard in 3rd you would be still be revving the 26 in 2nd.

I have/had two 26s, one in my 32 and one was in my 34, the 32 is stupid responsive and the 34 was quite laggy given its setup( to my standards anyway), I have/do track both cars and the better response is MUCH easier to control and much more predictable and is unbelievably easier to drive at normal street speeds, both where making within 20rwkw of each other and the 34 transitioning on to boost later in the rev range was alot harder to control coming onto boost at pace and no where near as nice to drive on the street

I have since built a 2630 for the 34 and have done so for a reason, if you are so worried about breaking drive lines then best you don't modify your car at all or even drive it hard cause any of that increases the chance of breaking stuff, a bit of mechanical symphony goes a long way as does knowledge of changing gears correctly

anyone that does modify there car like Paul, myself and many many others have, all realise that at some point the driveline is going to need the same sort of upgrading the engine got

A well built 26 at 350 to 380kw is bullet proof shifting under 8200rpm and in the gtr's sweet spot for the drive line around the track for the smart driver.

And if everything else in the setup is sorted not much will beat it in average speed and reliability.

Plus 26s sound better too

When i read that it sounds like thats what you meant.

Do you know how many rpm sooner the rb30 gets the -5s on boost compared to rb26?

@ Suboy32, or anyone else who has built and used a spacer, how much heavier is the pedal without the booster with this conversion?

Reason i ask is because we are planning to lift the body with subframe spacers and keep the booster.

In our case we are running a JB 5700Lb pressure plate and i was a little scared about how heavy the clutch might be without the booster.

I have/had two 26s, one in my 32 and one was in my 34, the 32 is stupid responsive and the 34 was quite laggy given its setup( to my standards anyway), I have/do track both cars and the better response is MUCH easier to control and much more predictable and is unbelievably easier to drive at normal street speeds, both where making within 20rwkw of each other and the 34 transitioning on to boost later in the rev range was alot harder to control coming onto boost at pace and no where near as nice to drive on the street

I have since built a 2630 for the 34 and have done so for a reason, if you are so worried about breaking drive lines then best you don't modify your car at all or even drive it hard cause any of that increases the chance of breaking stuff, a bit of mechanical symphony goes a long way as does knowledge of changing gears correctly

anyone that does modify there car like Paul, myself and many many others have, all realise that at some point the driveline is going to need the same sort of upgrading the engine got

Agreed with everything you have said, and you can set up a 26 correctly for response as you have suggested which does make it quite capable around a track.

And I am not suggesting that you cant break the driveline...but you are far less likely than an engine with more than double the torque down low applying so much more force to the driveline to overcome vehicle inertia, so you cant use a $700 gearbox like I can.

look at the guys running v8s or vls or xr6Ts, they are always twisting drive shafts and breaking diffs if they hook up especially now with G6s they are ripping out the zf gearboxes and putting stalled T400s in them and only making 450 kw but the torque is huge.

My view is that if your the average jo bo that wants a gtr as a good reliable allrounder, with spending $25k you can have a well sorted 350kw responsive 26 setup with decent handling upgrades that you can drive at the track and drive everyday.

Can I ask you what gearbox are you using now and is your 34 significantly quicker than a 26 that has its handling well sorted, and is the 34 street driven regularly.

When i read that it sounds like thats what you meant.

Do you know how many rpm sooner the rb30 gets the -5s on boost compared to rb26?

dont know but they are always on .XKLABAwill probably be more accurate

Agreed with everything you have said, and you can set up a 26 correctly for response as you have suggested which does make it quite capable around a track. more so, the 32 runs 15psi on the track which gives about 250rwkw vs 20psi on the 34 giving 313rwkw with the old setup which has better tyres-brakes-suspension and is 2 seconds slower around wakefield and about 8 around EC, that's the difference torque and response makes

And I am not suggesting that you cant break the driveline...but you are far less likely than an engine with more than double the torque down low applying so much more force to the driveline to overcome vehicle inertia, so you cant use a $700 gearbox like I can. that is right but if you want to make your car stupid fast then you have no choice but to upgrade the box and anyone that pushs their car that far knows that they are going to have to do the box, it's the only way to get the car that fast, so it really comes down to how fast you want to go, driving style has as much to do with broken boxes as power, I have seen stock cars break boxes just cause the driver is clueless

look at the guys running v8s or vls or xr6Ts, they are always twisting drive shafts and breaking diffs if they hook up especially now with G6s they are ripping out the zf gearboxes and putting stalled T400s in them and only making 450 kw but the torque is huge. oranges and apples really, you can't compare the GTR to a ford/holden as far as drive line goes, the engineering in the GTR is completely different and is so for different reasons

My view is that if your the average jo bo that wants a gtr as a good reliable allrounder, with spending $25k you can have a well sorted 350kw responsive 26 setup with decent handling upgrades that you can drive at the track and drive everyday. my 34 had poncams -7s and the normal supporting mods making 313rwkw@ 20psi and the difference in response between it and the 32 was massive, throw another 35+rwkw at it will mean going -5s so you don't have to run massive boost to get the 350rwkw which will make the 26 even less responsive and even slower around tight tracks unless your prepaired to rev the shit out of it which brings on another problem, syncros don't like big revs and having the to speed match gears with that much difference in gear speeds

Can I ask you what gearbox are you using now and is your 34 significantly quicker than a 26 that has its handling well sorted, and is the 34 street driven regularly. still the Getrag ATM but will either do the PPG set or bite the bullet and get the OS88, the 30 with GT-RSs so far responds like the 26 with -7s, just alot more drive off and on boost and even with 7psi it felt faster the the old setup, and was running around with the old tune, I have just completed the fuel system and changed the computer but haven't had it tuned yet, hopefully next week, and yes daily driven

dont know but they are always on .XKLABAwill probably be more accurate in my 34 I think the RSs respond like -7s on a 26 so the -5s IMO would be like my 32 with stock turbos just with a puck load more power

When i read that it sounds like thats what you meant.

Do you know how many rpm sooner the rb30 gets the -5s on boost compared to rb26?

He only did one run off actuator pressure then turned a bearing but it was 15 PSI at 3000 RPM where as the RS's were 1200 RPM later. SPewing he didn't had it all wound up. On the road he said it was just silly, boardering on insane. Look at the throttle and the boost needle is flying around.

When i read that it sounds like thats what you meant.

Do you know how many rpm sooner the rb30 gets the -5s on boost compared to rb26?

He only did one run off actuator pressure then turned a bearing but it was 15 PSI at 3000 RPM where as the RS's were 1200 RPM later. SPewing he didn't had it all wound up. On the road he said it was just silly, boardering on insane. Look at the throttle and the boost needle is flying around.

Sounds good, mite even be slightly more responsive than my hta3586 which is 20psi at 3200-3300rpm.

Was that on stock manifolds?

Ive always thought about the -5s on mine for a stock looking engine bay.

Sounds good, mite even be slightly more responsive than my hta3586 which is 20psi at 3200-3300rpm.

Was that on stock manifolds?

Ive always thought about the -5s on mine for a stock looking engine bay.

Stock manifolds, cams that were too big and a small exhaust and on first pull on the RS tune, so there was ALOT more left in it.

XKLABA: do you know how much faster you are lapping Wakefield with the 26/30? Valuable to draw comparisons for everyone. Thanks.

Not yet, still have to have it tuned, the car did a 1.09 on the old setup but with some more correction of the setup and better suspension and tyres I think a high 1.06 wasn't out of the question, with this setup I would like/hope to see a flat minute which I believe will be possible once it all finished

@ Suboy32, or anyone else who has built and used a spacer, how much heavier is the pedal without the booster with this conversion?

Reason i ask is because we are planning to lift the body with subframe spacers and keep the booster.

In our case we are running a JB 5700Lb pressure plate and i was a little scared about how heavy the clutch might be without the booster.

I didn't notice any difference in pedal feel going from the factory master to the S15 turbo one on my Nismo Dual Plate Coppermix Clutch.....but then it is a bit of a softie anyway. I haven't tried it with any other clutches, I'm not sure what RIPS uses when he gets the adapters off me.

Q. i'm currently needing a rebuild, an only bn to one happy laps in the 5n a half years ive owned the car. An yes I do like to listen to my car sing to 8000 before changing gear n not running out of puff.

currently have a rb26, -5's n 270 cams. but as its my weekend driver (when its going) it can be a lil annoying with lag round town. Im glad someone pointed out some of the head aches of a 30/26. I know drag 32/26's will happily rev to 9000+ but a purpose built. I'm not after super quick laptimes...

I know a 30/26 would fix down low problems, but worried what the difference is from 6000-8000rpm, as ive spent time in an xr6 turbo, an no lag is great, but just got more boring towards the limiter the harder u revved it instead of getting more exciting, didn't seem right. an maybe I should get out more an go to more skyline meets, but how bad can a 30/26 sound

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Can perhaps see how the R33 appreciators would think so.  
    • Thanks, I removed the fuse and the relay from the car and made my own circuit with them to test them with a test bulb.  I will look for the wiring diagram and go from there.
    • Jdm DC2R is also nice for a FF car compared to the regular hatches of the time.
    • Now that the break-in period for both clutch and transmission is nearly over I'd like to give some tips before I forget about everything that happened, also for anyone searching up how to do this job in the future: You will need at least 6 ton jack stands at full extension. I would go as far as to say maybe consider 12 ton jack stands because the height of the transmission + the Harbor Freight hydraulic platform-style transmission jack was enough that it was an absolute PITA getting the transmission out from under the car and back in. The top edge of the bellhousing wants to contact the subframe and oil pan and if you're doing this on the floor forget about trying to lift this transmission off the ground and onto a transmission jack from under the car. Also do not try to use a scissor jack transmission lift. You have to rotate the damn thing in-place on the transmission jack which is hard enough with an adjustable platform and a transmission cradle that will mostly keep the transmission from rolling off the jack but on a scissor lift with a tiny non-adjustable platform? Forget it. Use penetrating oil on the driveshaft bolts. I highly recommend getting a thin 6 point combination (box end + open end) wrench for both the rear driveshaft and front driveshaft and a wrench extension. These bolts are on tight with very little space to work with and those two things together made a massive difference. Even a high torque impact wrench is just the wrong tool for the job here and didn't do what I needed it to do. If your starter bolts aren't seized in place for whatever reason you can in fact snake in a 3/8 inch ratchet + 6 point standard chrome socket up in there and "just" remove the bolts for the starter. Or at least I could. It is entirely by feel, you can barely fit it in, you can barely turn the stupid ratchet, but it is possible. Pull the front pipe/downpipe before you attempt to remove the transmission. In theory you don't have to, in practice just do it.  When pulling the transmission on the way out you don't have to undo all the bolts holding the rear driveshaft to the chassis like the center support bearing and the rear tunnel reinforcement bar but putting the transmission back in I highly recommend doing this because it will let you raise the transmission without constantly dealing with the driveshaft interfering in one way or another. I undid the bottom of the engine mount but I honestly don't know that it helped anything. If you do this make sure you put a towel on the back of the valve cover to keep the engine from smashing all the pipes on the firewall. Once the transmission has been pulled back far enough to clear the dowels you need to twist it in place clockwise if you're sitting behind the transmission. This will rotate the starter down towards the ground. The starter bump seems like it might clear if you twist the transmission the other way but it definitely won't. I have scraped the shit out of my transmission tunnel trying so learn from my mistake. You will need a center punch and an appropriate size drill bit and screw to pull the rear main seal. Then use vice grips and preferably a slide hammer attachment for those vice grips to yank the seal out. Do not let the drill or screw contact any part of the crank and clean the engine carefully after removing the seal to avoid getting metal fragments into the engine. I used a Slide Hammer and Bearing Puller Set, 5 Piece from Harbor Freight to pull the old pilot bearing. The "wet paper towel" trick sucked and just got dirty clutch water everywhere. Buy the tool or borrow it from a friend and save yourself the pain. It comes right out. Mine was very worn compared to the new one and it was starting to show cracks. Soak it in engine oil for a day in case yours has lost all of the oil to the plastic bag it comes in. You may be tempted to get the Nismo aftermarket pilot bearing but local mechanics have told me that they fail prematurely and if they do fail they do far more damage than a failed OEM pilot bushing. I mentioned this before but the Super Coppermix Twin clutch friction disks are in fact directional. The subtle coning of the fingers in both cases should be facing towards the center of the hub. So the coning on the rearmost disk closest to the pressure plate should go towards the engine, and the one closest to the flywheel should be flipped the other way. Otherwise when you torque down the pressure plate it will be warped and if you attempt to drive it like this it will make a very nasty grinding noise. Also, there is in fact an orientation to the washers for the pressure plate if you don't want to damage the anodizing. Rounded side of the washer faces the pressure plate. The flat side faces the bolt head. Pulling the transmission from the transfer case you need to be extremely careful with the shift cover plate. This part is discontinued. Try your best to avoid damaging the mating surfaces or breaking the pry points. I used a dead blow rubber hammer after removing the bolts to smack it sideways to slide it off the RTV the previous mechanic applied. I recommend using gasket dressing on the OEM paper gasket to try and keep the ATF from leaking out of that surface which seems to be a perpetual problem. Undoing the shifter rod end is an absolute PITA. Get a set of roll pin punches. Those are mandatory for this. Also I strongly, strongly recommend getting a palm nailer that will fit your roll pin punch. Also, put a clean (emphasis on clean) towel wrapped around the back end of the roll pin to keep it from shooting into the transfer case so you can spend a good hour or two with a magnet on a stick getting it out. Do not damage the shifter rod end either because those are discontinued as well. Do not use aftermarket flywheel bolts. Or if you do, make sure they are exactly the same dimensions as OEM before you go to install them. I have seen people mention that they got the wrong bolts and it meant having to do the job again. High torque impact wrench makes removal easy. I used some combination of a pry bar and flathead screwdriver to keep the flywheel from turning but consider just buying a proper flywheel lock instead. Just buy the OS Giken clutch alignment tool from RHDJapan. I hated the plastic alignment tool and you will never be confident this thing will work as intended. Don't forget to install the Nismo provided clutch fork boot. Otherwise it will make unearthly noises when you press the clutch pedal as it says on the little installation sheet in Japanese. Also, on both initial disassembly and assembly you must follow torque sequence for the pressure plate bolts. For some reason the Nismo directions tell you to put in the smaller 3 bolts last. I would not do this. Fully insert and thread those bolts to the end first, then tighten the other larger pressure plate bolts according to torque sequence. Then at the end you can also torque these 3 smaller bolts. Doing it the other way can cause these bolts to bind and the whole thing won't fit as it should. Hope this helps someone out there.
×
×
  • Create New...