Nitto Head Drain

[Fat32gtr]

Has anyone had any experience with these? are they an easy fit and how do they compare with spool?

Thanks

[89CAL]

Looks better then the spool item.

I have the spool drain gets a bit close to the gearbox because it exits out of the bottom, but the spool one exits from the side so you wouldnt have that problem. If your heart is set on a head drain then I'd say the Nitto one looks better

[Fat32gtr]

The spool one looks abit more effective, it's got more of a fall where as the nitto one goes off to the side. I would want the oil to go down quicker to the sump.

[89CAL]

Well yes and no. If you look at the spool drains, there is alot of extra space on the spool drain and the fitting screws in there. The spool goes in where the welsch plug in the head pops out, and then there is extra meat on the drain for it to screw into the head.

The nitto one will just have a side exit with the bottom of the drain in line with the head welsch plug/port. So I think the Nitto one would be more efficent. Trust me, there is not alot of room between the 90 degree fitting off the spool head drain and the gearbox. I admit I havent put the gearbox on yet but lining it up with your eye you can see how close it will come

[jangles]

The spool one looks abit more effective, it's got more of a fall where as the nitto one goes off to the side. I would want the oil to go down quicker to the sump.

Oil doesn't go down to the sump, so don't worry.

[KiwiRS4T]

Oil doesn't go down to the sump, so don't worry.

^^^ what he said... Read the thread (or the last twenty or so pages...

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/110680-oil-control-in-rbs-for-circuit-drag-or-drift/?&hl=sk+oil+control