Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I keep having the same argument at work , i have always been under the impression Turbos work better in cool moist air conditions due to the density of the air rather than hot dry .

My colleagues are firm believers a NA engine will lose greater power Vs a turbocharged engine in the heat .

So hypothetically if you had two cars one Normally Aspirated one Forced Induction both with the same horsepower same weight , the NA will lose in a drag in hot weather .

I tried reading this - Thermodynamics NA vs Turbocharged , http://www.academia.edu/3407176/Turbocharged_Engines

Any truth in this ?

Edited by NISSAN GTR

Only a 2 week old turbo charged car owner, but isnt the compressed gases from the turbo blazing hot anyway? Hence why there is an intercooler? And wouldnt the airflow meter have some sort of influence on how much harder the turbo would work on a hot day compared to a cold to generate similar power levels? Just taking a shot here =p

In my experience, Nissans turbos that do not have an inlet air temperature sensor actually go harder when it is hot because they get closer to the detonation threshold. The ECU has no way of advancing the ignition to take advantage of the cooler air in cold weather.

It may just be a placebo effect, but I'm fairly convinced. It has seemed that way to me with both my RB20 and my 25 Neo, and it has also seemed that way in other Nissans I've driven across widely different weather conditions. BUT, it did not seem that way in an SR20 turbo I drove for a while. And of course, they have an IAT sensor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...