Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

After thinking long and hard about consolidating things in general, I thought a WRX STI might make a nice alternative to a couple of cars I am thinking of letting go.

Anyway, as there are only a couple of STI dealers in Sydney I ended up at one a few hours ago.

Looked at the specs and got excited at the thought of owning one.

I went to the Chatswood dealership and must admit the service and courteousness was excellent.

No pressure, brochures given to me without having to ask, coffee, soft drink fell over them selves to be nice.

Cutting to the chase..... I asked them that I would like a test drive, what would it take?

Answer...... Do you have a licence sir? Yes.... That's all you need. A quick photocopy of my licence and a liability contract signed and they handed me the keys.

He asked if 30 minutes was enough to know if I was interested?

I said "probably"....... Off I went solo.

I allowed the car to warm up for the first 6-7 minutes but once I saw the operating temperature normal, my spirited driving increased.

As an owner of 2 R32 GT-R's (1 x ADM and 1 x JDM) both 100% stock as a rock with original radios and exhaust systems etc etc I thought this was going to be an interesting comparison.

There is simply one word that describes my experience.

Extreamely......UNDERWELMED!!!!!!!!!

A real disappointment.

Whilst on paper you have the STI at 221kw and weighing 1525kg and 206kw but we know it's closer to 230kw with boost restrictor removed and 1495kg for the JDM GT-R. There is no comparison.

The STI felt as though it weighed 1800 kgs. It had no real WOW factor once the boost came in. Sure it's quick and if the fasted car you have ever driven is a Camry then you would be impressed but as someone fortunate to have driven some really nice quick cars it's a 6/10 for me.

At $70,000 or thereabouts, I'd have buyers remorse after 2 days and watch the depreciation tare up $100 notes in front of my eyes every day.

I guess the one thing that keeps coning to mind is remembering that the ADM GT-R's were $113,000.00 22 years ago and they were that price for a reason. They are, by even todays standards brilliant motor vehicles........ Godzilla still reigns.. Long live the King.

Bob.

post-78207-0-54620100-1382852161_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-95677900-1382852162_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434092-r32-gt-r-vs-new-wrx-sti/
Share on other sites

Hiya Bob,

You asked me some similar Qs at the Mac Pass meetup at Casula as to why one would consider a car of contrast rather than buy another RB.

If you can make the next cruise (rather than have a prior commitment as you did then), you're welcome to ask me to bring the 8MR and then swap driver's seats for a bit.

Top Gear comparison tells a bit of the story - but not all, as you'd know...

Regards

New STI is also Susan Boyle ugly.... Looks like a KIA.. Designer should be shot

GC8 WRX shape is the best imo, followed by the MY03/05 shape

Not sure if it's just me but I reckon that most new-ish cars all look the same. KIA's,Hyundia,Holden,bmw etc. have very similar lines.

Edited by dyl33

In newer cars..... you just don't get 'that feeling'.

The chassis design is governed by modern safety rules, there are numerous electrical features that are unnecessary for a 'drivers car', and they feel really muted. In my opinion they will never match the 90's cars.

The 90's Japanese supercars (such as Skyline GT-R, Toyota Supra TT, Honda NSX etc) were over-engineered to respond well to tuning and they almost feel as though they are alive, they just have a lot more character.

Having owned and driven a few subies I can tell you that the later model gear is extremely asthmatic. I had a GTB manual wagon, it was a slug in standard form, after an AVO interwarmer, AVO dump and cat, HKS catback and a HKS panel filter I managed to extract some beans from it.

Stock standard they are gawd awful. No surprise that the old GTR feels different.

Nice review Bob, good read.

Looks aside, how did you find the response and low down torque of the sti compared to your bnr32?

My 32's are both stock so there isn't much difference there...... Where there is a big difference is when the boost comes in.

A 6 cylinder twin turbo vs. a 4 cylinder single turbo is the difference. The GT-R just feels a lot tougher.

Bob.

My daughter owned this WRX for 9 months until we sold it to buy a MX-5.

I loved it and pleaded with her not to sell it but it was like talking to a brick wall.

Fortunately the MX-5 is a great car too and probably a bit more suited to a 21 year old.

If I didn't already have a fleet of cars I would have tried to find a way of keeping it but that simply wasn't possible.

The new car didn't feel much faster ( or that much better) than hers but was $60,000 more!

Cheers and thanks for the favourable comments about the review. It motivates me to keep finding interesting things to discuss.

Bob.

post-78207-0-95000700-1382960942_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-42474400-1382960944_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-31875500-1382960946_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-35340500-1382960948_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-29518200-1382960960_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-85700300-1382961067_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-15960200-1382961072_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-02043100-1382961078_thumb.jpg

post-78207-0-74650500-1382961145_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

My 32's are both stock so there isn't much difference there...... Where there is a big difference is when the boost comes in.

A 6 cylinder twin turbo vs. a 4 cylinder single turbo is the difference. The GT-R just feels a lot tougher.

Bob.

Bob I knew your cars were 100% factory so it's a good comparison.

Good to know the Gtr can match the sti down low, as all i ever hear is how a gtr (stock or lightly modified) cant match the 'torquey' response of a 2.5L Sti.

Edited by the spruce moose

The R32- GTR is in my humble opinion one of the true 'apex technology' cars - the true highlight of its generation.....there was nothing more.....

The current Subi isn't at that level yet. If anything the R35 GTR approaches what I would expect from an 'apex' car using todays technology.

You feel that difference.......

Cheers

The Baron

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...