Jump to content
SAU Community

Z32 Ecu Rb25 Nistune Modified - Rb26 Chipped Ecu Custom Tuned


Recommended Posts

I got a Z32 ecu modified correctly with a brand new Nistune board installed to run in a Series 1 R33 GTST, have tested it in my own car and everything is all good.

I have modded this ECU myself, so you can be sure it is working correctly with no issues. Can do the series 2 modifications for no extra charge after payment has been made before sending the ecu.

post-1240-0-50019100-1382864990_thumb.jpg post-1240-0-07915300-1382865036_thumb.jpg

pic of the ecu and some of the modifications done on the board to make it a true plug in solution for r33.

Selling for $550

Also i have 2 x RB26 R32 gtr ecu's, with custom programs, ecu's are socketed and have a 512kb eprom chip that can be written unlimited amount of times, I will put a stock RB26 r32 gtr program inside but remove the speed limit and can also set the rev limiter to how you want it.

For the guys who are really keen, i can provide 2 x chips, and offer a mail in tune service, you just tell me what you need done to the chip and i will wrirte it and send it back to you in the mail until your car is properly tuned, or come to me in Newcastle NSW and i will do a full custom nistune dyno tune for your car and burn the chip for you.

Selling the GTR ecu's for $250 each with one custom eprom installed, pm me if you want to customise the eprom for your car.

mail in tunes only available for mild setups please! or it becomes too messy.

Can also make the modification required for R33 GTR for no extra cost after payment has been made.

post-1240-0-70859300-1382865220_thumb.jpg

pickup available Newcastle NSW, post is only about $25 per ecu.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Seatbelt bolts are 7/16 UNF in most cases
    • Yes, this is why I end up being 'vocal' with executives. "I want it" can't be "Just because we should have it" you need reasons. It has way too big knock on effects to simply want something "Just because" at that level in orgs with 10,000+ employees. Currently, message labelling. Sounds great. Except there is no governance on how to actually HANDLE message labels, so I may as well implement the labels as "Pink Flamingo" or "Conrod" or "Massive Dildo" and force people to choose one for every message, with no framework underpinning any of it. It has no value and can actually have detrimental value if all it does is serve to annoy people into clicking something random, or just using the default for everything, especially if there's no repercussions for getting it wrong, no monitoring for people doing it right, and no guidance on what needs to be what label. "But we need message labels!" f**k sake.
    • It's worse than that. They cannot even picture the full scope of what it is that they are pitching or wanting. They see the core idea and cannot conceive of any of the side effects, compromises, losses of existing functionality that needs to be replaced somehow, etc etc, that come with doing these things. So how can they do a cost/benefit when they don't even know what the full set of changes actually looks like?
    • I mean something people seem to be WOEFUL at is doing a proper cost/benefit analysis. Going cloud is great, if it saves you time and money. Does it? I have found a LOT of managers just want 'the new thing' with SUB-zero understanding of what it is and how it functions and why they need it. I spend a lot of time on that point nowadays too.
    • I'm an engineer. I am not supposed to do IT. I have been doing my company's IT for 25 years, because initially there was no one else capable and since because I don't trust anyone. Back in the day, we used to run a Linux server with just sendmail level mail handling. Everything was POP and SMTP. Then, someone demanded calendaring and the like, so I implemented Scalix (an OS Exchange clone) - from scratch. Migrated all the numpties over, administered that system for years. Then Scalix started to decline. So I spun up a full Zimbra system. Same same as Scalix, but different (ie, not even a fork). Ran that for a while in parallel with Scalix as I tried to migrate old users over. Both of these were on prem, with local backup in the case of Zimbra. (No backup at all on the Scalix server! Gasp!) At some point, I spat the dummy, after years of this, and capitulated and bought O365 for the whole company and migrated everyone off the on prem stuff and shuffled them off to the cloud. It has been easier and shitter ever since, seeing as MS cannot leave anything alone for more than 3 minutes and have to keep changing everything and making it "better' (I read that as "harder"!). It's like their entire crew are ADHD squirrels on meth. Meanwhile, all our data has been kept on prem on file servers with decent backup. Now the higher ups are demanding that we migrate all the data to the cloud. I am shuddering at the idea that it will all be held to ransom on some shit AWS or, even worse, Azure/Sharepoint system where you're at the mercies of the above posted price hikes, commercial disputes, company collapses/takeovers/DOS attacks/etc etc. I hate it. But... if it can get me free of the bloody IT shit so I can finally concentrate on real engineering work for the first time in 25 years, then.... good?
×
×
  • Create New...