Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Finally decided to adjust my TPS to hopefully fix the 4WD light coming on, as the error i got on th eattessa computer 7 long flash's anda 5 short ones, did some research and it comes up with the TPS.

My TPS voltage on iginition was under 0.4v on my hand controller, after some reading it should be above .4 and under .5v is the general concensus.

So i have adjusted my tps to read these values with the ignition on (motor not running), but under the sensor/check on the hand controller, there is a IDL option, and previously the dot was black on idle, but not with the adjustment sometimes its clear sometimes its black.

will this impact anything?

What does it mean?

I have a feeling it means the ecu is in "idle" mode, but maybe i have adjusted my TPS to much and it thinks there is some load on the motor?

Little confused and not 100% sure if my theories are correct.

Any advice would be great!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434737-adjusting-tps-power-fc-question/
Share on other sites

The TPS is basically a 2 part sensor. One measures variable resistance to get your throttle position, so varies between 0-5V depending on the throttle position. There is also a digital (on/off) switch that will probably be what is bringing the IDL light on. It's been a while since I've played with my Power FC, but pretty sure everything you are saying sounds alright, that switch should be on (Black) when no throttle is applied, and off when throttle is applied.

0.45v I think is what generally the TPS gets set to

I had some problems with (from memory) the idle sensor light in sensor check. I thought it was under another name in my GTS-t Power FC but could be wrong

I played with the TPS after I got a new TPS sensor (chasing another issue) and never had this problem again. So not saying its the sensor but could be

I think when I originally had the problem it went away after a bit of driving.

Hmmmm...

So if my IDL switch is saying its off (as in not black) when the car is idling with obviously no throttle applied.

Will it be a issue?

I assume its just not running the idle map?

My car's idle is a bit shit, because i cleaned the butterfly's on my throttle bodies when I upgraded the turbo's >_<

So that could even have something to do with it, none the less i think it was operating properly before.

EDIT: Also i thought the max reading was 4v on wide open throttle?

Edited by Booki

I don't have direct experience with RB26 TPS, but the nearest equivalent ECU I have experience with is RB20. RB20 do not have a variable resistor for the ECU. There is only closed throttle and WOT switches. The variable resistor in the RB20 ECU is unused on manuals and reports to the TCU on autos. So, not a useful example, you might think. But I shall plow on regardless. I worked out that the best way to set the TPS on RB20 was to have it so that the closed switch would come off at the slightest, tiniest hint of opening of the throttle. This would cause the ECU to double fire the injectors (they do this little double click batch fire thing as you crack the throttle) and give the best throttle response for driving off.

Fast forward to ECUs with variable resistor TPSs like RB25s and so on. You need to set the TPS voltage at idle so that the ECU activates the idle condition (so that is the IDL light on PFC) and so that it takes only a teeny, weensy movement of the throttle to make it turn off. That is generally at or near 0.45V like the guys above have said, but it may be a little more or a little less.

So, for your car, it seems like your TPS might be set just a tiny bit too high. Back it off a tiny bit so it stays convincingly in idle mode when you're idling. Job done I expect.

It was set correctly before but the attessa system would throw up codes because the volt reading would sometimes be low, might have to fiddle with it some more. Its at .41v with ignition and goes a little higher when the car is running.

Is that normal?

0.41 is a little on the low side, but not out of range, and the fact that it increases with the engine running is normal because the voltage reading only occurs because it is a variable resistor across notional 5V supply, but the 5V supply is not regulated to perfection, so it tends to increase in voltage a little when the alternator boosts the 12V line. So really, it's not 0.41V in your case, because I'd only do the measurement/adjust with the engine running anyway.

  • 6 months later...

just digging this up

so ive been having idle hunt issues with hot start and also when i put the clutch in at about 2.5k+ revs

done heaps of reading about afm aac ect, have considered cleaning them again, but i did notice some say tps

i looked this morning and realised on ign or car running at idle its .35v which i understand as low, anything btwn 0.45 and 0.5 is good

so looks like it needs adjusting.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/404812-help-setting-tps-on-r33-s2/

found that thread but can i adjust the tps without a multimeter and use the powerfc hand controllers reading?
also does it affect anything tune wise?(will i need to check afrs or anything)

just digging this up

so ive been having idle hunt issues with hot start and also when i put the clutch in at about 2.5k+ revs

done heaps of reading about afm aac ect, have considered cleaning them again, but i did notice some say tps

i looked this morning and realised on ign or car running at idle its .35v which i understand as low, anything btwn 0.45 and 0.5 is good

so looks like it needs adjusting.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/404812-help-setting-tps-on-r33-s2/

found that thread but can i adjust the tps without a multimeter and use the powerfc hand controllers reading?

also does it affect anything tune wise?(will i need to check afrs or anything)

do you have a stock ecu or powerFC....idle control is either closed loop with the o2 feedback turned on or open loop (set by tuning it) if its hunting this can becuase it is running too lean at idle.

power fc

yeah just weird that its fine most times, but only when started hot it will hunt for a couple of seconds, if i clutch in from about 2.5k and above and keep my foot on the clutch it will drop to 500 and up and down for a couple of secs then fine, just figured the tps needs adjusting as a start as its slightly low

Edited by MatthewT85

yeah did that, turned it to roughly 750 was going between 730-880ish there abouts and then plugged it back in, started and it was hunting for ages(10secs didnt normalise till i took the key out and timer was counting)so that didnt help unfort if anything made it worse

Ummm....Badgaz......closed loop idle control has nothing to do with mixtures. It is, by definition, "closed loop idle speed control" not "closed loop mixture control".

Closed loop mixture control barely works at idle anyway because the O2 sensor usually gets too cold to work quickly anyway. Regardless, they are two totally separate things.

I remember when I turned my O2 feedback control off and idle didn't change at all. I was under the impression that at idle (when the TPS indicates closed throttle) then the idle IGN and fuel maps are active and the o2 sensor is all but ignored

I had some problems with my TPS not putting the car into idle control for some reason even though the voltages were fine. I pulled it off, messed around with it a bit checking it was operating fine then put it back and all of a sudden it worked again. Strange but something to think about. I ended up buying a new TPS and never seemed to have any issues with it, so maybe my old one, although it indicated it was alright, actually had a problem.

Its a good idea (Although probably not practical for the OP if Power FC is tuned and running) when first installing a Power FC, to check all the sensors and switches are O.K and adjust the TPS to the correct position before performing the Data INIT.

Problems like these are not a problem on newer ECU's. The Link I have now for example has TPS calibration in the PC Software, so if it ever seems like it has a problem, you can just recalibrate it so it knows were 0% and 100% are and its happy again. I'm still a supporter of the Power FC however, as for what most people need it is a pretty good simple replacement ECU. The Link is a much better ECU, but not everything on it is necessary for most

cheers guys, i think i might adjust the tps to reflect 0.45v or slightly above and go from there, maybe have to look at cleaning afm and aac again.

but yeah seeing as though everything ive read has said my voltage is low might be a good starting point

I remember when I turned my O2 feedback control off and idle didn't change at all. I was under the impression that at idle (when the TPS indicates closed throttle) then the idle IGN and fuel maps are active and the o2 sensor is all but ignored

I had some problems with my TPS not putting the car into idle control for some reason even though the voltages were fine. I pulled it off, messed around with it a bit checking it was operating fine then put it back and all of a sudden it worked again. Strange but something to think about. I ended up buying a new TPS and never seemed to have any issues with it, so maybe my old one, although it indicated it was alright, actually had a problem.

Its a good idea (Although probably not practical for the OP if Power FC is tuned and running) when first installing a Power FC, to check all the sensors and switches are O.K and adjust the TPS to the correct position before performing the Data INIT.

Problems like these are not a problem on newer ECU's. The Link I have now for example has TPS calibration in the PC Software, so if it ever seems like it has a problem, you can just recalibrate it so it knows were 0% and 100% are and its happy again. I'm still a supporter of the Power FC however, as for what most people need it is a pretty good simple replacement ECU. The Link is a much better ECU, but not everything on it is necessary for most

Initially i had thought that as my ign was showing different in my logging to what it showed on the map....but i tried adjusting the fuel map at idle and watched the afr's change. it'd be nice to have power excel to see if there is an idle control system unseen through the fcdatalogit.

the tps will not affect your tune mixtures.

so i adjusted the tps to 0.45v and it looks like ive fixed the hunting on clutch in and hot start, but ill drive it round for a couple of days before saying its 100% fixed.

also for anyone else thats gonna try i pretty much stripped the screws and had to use vice grips to loosen them first.

i think ill also do the idle reset soon too

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thing I'd be doing, is pulling it out, and just getting the tune cleaned up for now. Before that even happens, checking over everything, like vac hoses, fuel hoses, etc. No point dropping thousands on sensors if the moment you start it back up all the oil leaks out, or it has massive vacuum leaks etc.   But really, to know what to do, depends on what your use case is. Hard core track car? Throw most sensors available at it. Street car, I'd probably just run oil pressure, oil temps, water pressure, water temp, probably fuel pressure too. I don't know exactly what the Link can handle and do with those though. And if it's mainly just to cruise the streets, rather than mountain runs, you can probably skip most of the above if you've already got them in as gauges and warning lights.   PS, inb4 "sell it and buy a modern sportscar"
    • Keen to see the turbosmart data, to date I've only seen negative things in terms of response for them. Very small sample size though.     Hawkins is a big advocate in his videos of the larger rear housings. I managed to make similar power with a lower spec motor on the smaller .8 rear, keeping decentish spool.  The people he works with now are big power cars compared to mine though, mine really is setup to drive around and enjoy.  I don't have any back pressure monitoring though, so couldn't say if its good or bad on my car, just that it does what I want it to do.   Future I want a higher compression more cubes motor to give a bit more bottom end and hopefully the new g35-1150 gets me to the 850 rear comfortably.  But maybe I won't due to exhaust back pressure.
    • No, I refuse to buy their cheap ass crap! I do need to order a bunch of different nuts/bolts to refill my nut/bolt wall though. Maybe you could go for a walk through Bunnings for me? (Or send me some stuff from your work? )   I really struggle to work out how the US standardised to Metric in what the 70s or 80s, and yet, half a century later, there's been little done to actually bring it into fruition. It truly baffles me    On the whole Fastenal thing, I went reading their site (My god they sell a lot of varied stuff!), and it seems like it really depends what store you're near if you can walk in and just grab a few small things, or if that branch is primarily distribution with only a small window of "counter time" available (if at all). That definitely makes it harder, as move locations and it drastically changes your ability for success   For things like your M6x1.0, if you want to work on your own Skyline, and you also have a "home workshop" I'd recommend setting yourself up a small Nut/Bolt wall/section. It doesn't even need to be big at all. Most things depending on the diameter, will be a specific pitch, like the M6x1, M5x0.7 etc. Bigger bolts is mostly 1.5, except for a small number of things and that will come down to torque. From memory bolts for the brake calipers (and other things that need a lot of torque) will end up being a 1.25mm pitch. Save up a few dollars, and order a range of nuts/bolts. If you want to minimise cost a little, buy something like M6 x 40, and M6x70mm (1mm pitch) in both. In addition, buy yourself an M6x1mm thread chaser. That way you have long bolts that you can cut down to size, and then chase the threads out. Funnily enough, I find what I'd pay here for ordering 5 bolts, I can pay about 50% more and you'll get 100 of them.   If that doesn't quite work out due to space / ability to buy plenty up front, then each time you need some bolts, order 100 of what ever you're getting. Put them in clearly marked containers. Over a few years, you'll acquire plenty of different sizes, and will end up ordering less and less. And the cost for 100 bolts won't be much more than you paid for your 5 you needed to order anyway  Just takes a little planning ahead, by investigating what nuts/bolts you'll need, and ordering them before doing the job.     Edit: If it's also primarily for working on just the Skyline, for some reason my brain is screaming that at some point, either Nissan, Nismo, (Or possibly a third party) was selling a "kit" of every nut and bolt in a Skyline, purely for people restoring/rebuilding. It'd likely be quite expensive, but would give you every/any nut/bolt you need for stock/factory things. I'm not sure if it's still available, or even if it actually fully came to market, it's just something niggling in the back of my brain that you could look into further if that sort of thing interested you? (It might have been for the R32 GTR or something specifically too, and not just any Skyline)
    • 90lb/min @ 20psi is wonderful, not so much of a problem with the G35-1050's compressor efficiency (aside from how bad they roll back at higher pressure ratios).  The issue is more to do with the turbine's flow, which is why I'm not sold on going an even higher flowing compressor with the same turbine.  I'd say go back over Motive DVD's testing of the G35 1050 and Hawkins's comments regarding exhaust back pressure issues with it, I'd need to go back but I have in my head he went to the biggest hotside and ended up sacrificing a lot of spool (so it ended up behaving like a bigger turbo) and still had EMAP issues.  I've heard various other experiences along the lines of that. At this stage at least I rate all I've seen about Xonas (for transparency I've not used one directly, but I have spoke plenty with people who have) to have low exhaust restriction for the response they offer for any given setup - basically they allow the engine to breathe, which is good for the engine and makes making power a lot easier.  You arguably don't have to even push quite the same amount of airflow through an engine to make the same power if you don't have the bum plugged up with exhaust gas struggling to escape the engine due to an underflowing turbine.   In terms of reliability, to be fair I've had great luck with Garrett turbos as well - my GT3076R lasted forever, then I sold it and the next owner had no issues, then that car got sold and it was still going strong last I ever heard about it.  The trick is with the old GT-series turbos the compressors etc were no way near as efficient as what we have these days, it was almost hard to push them into severe overspeed situations without having a boost leak or something - and that is what often starts the failure situation.    In terms of your G35 I'm pretty sure you're running yours within sensible limits, something people with Xonas and Precision turbos aren't often so inclined to do.  The "compressor maps" are "Joe blogs ran 45psi through his 6466 so I can do the same" and built their setup to send it to the moon.  I've seen EMAP and compressor speed data where people have actually set that stuff up on Precisions and Xonas which have been run hard and the comp speed numbers are very very exciting at times - like I've seen 76mm Precisions run at rpm that you ideally shouldn't run a G35 1050 lol.   I know people who have run G-series Garretts hard and hard a failure, then replaced them with Pulsar turbos as a cheap "get it going" stop gap with the intent of doing a proper upgrade when THAT fails... and are still running the same thing.   Like anything, ymmv and it's not always to do with the quality or trustworthiness of said product. I've been provided with a bunch of compressor maps for Turbosmart turbos and will update my list based off that, they could prove to interesting reading and an interesting alternative as well.
    • Just cage it, call it a race car, and then fall in love with the chirp chirps through pit area!   Also, this is coming from someone with a completely locked diff...
×
×
  • Create New...