Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The comp ratio is swept vs unswept volume. Very simple. It gets much more difficult once the engine is spinng, as now the cam timing, condition of the valves and ring seals and head gasket play a part, along with volumetric efficiency, temperature etc. To figure out an unknown engines comp ratio from a comp test is never going to be accurate. Cam timing plays a huge role. If you are buying a built engine ask for the actual figures. If you are happy to assume its a high comp ratio motor based on that test, (which changed a fair bit once you asked for confirmation) by all means buy it.

^^ this! Some very very early combustion engines had low compression figures from the factory due to the low CR of around 6 to 1

Id say rob is running 8 to 1 CR as hi boost turbos ADD a lot of compression pressure to the engine therefore lowering the CR he can run (part governed by fuel octane)

Settle down. explain to me how an engine when built has a certain compression test result, then when worn had a lesser compression test result? Did it's comp ratio drop? can you run more boost cos it has less comp ratio? NO. explain how comp ratio effects the comp test results please :)

Ive compared 2 identical engines before, one with 150psi ( supposed to be 7.6-1) each cylinder and one with 180psi, and the one with 180psi cleary had more balls, the 180psi one had the head shaved which would of increased the comp ratio..

also a previous rb20det that was in nice condition, showed up as 150psi on average, showed 100rwkw without intercooler so about right I think, just for reference

Edited by AngryRB

^^ this! Some very very early combustion engines had low compression figures from the factory due to the low CR of around 6 to 1

Id say rob is running 8 to 1 CR as hi boost turbos ADD a lot of compression pressure to the engine therefore lowering the CR he can run (part governed by fuel octane)

Ive compared 2 identical engines before, one with 150psi ( supposed to be 7.6-1) each cylinder and one with 180psi, and the one with 180psi cleary had more balls, the 180psi one had the head shaved which would of increased the comp ratio..

also a previous rb20det that was in nice condition, showed up as 150psi on average, showed 100rwkw without intercooler so about right I think, just for reference

I have low compression pistons as they were lying around the shop at the time of my low budget build. Consequently I have to run 25 psi to make the same power as others do with 18psi and high compression pistons! It was a very slow build and over time I added more expensive components to the top of the engine (what you might call the wrong way round)! If and when my engine goes bang I will rebore and fit 9.5:1 forged pistons and properly balance everything.

must be a pain to drive off boost, im keen to do a rb30det with 9.5-10-1 with e85 and a 3076, nothing worse than a sluggish motor on the streets, but sometimes you just have to do the best with what you've got..

must be a pain to drive off boost, im keen to do a rb30det with 9.5-10-1 with e85 and a 3076, nothing worse than a sluggish motor on the streets, but sometimes you just have to do the best with what you've got..

Not at all a pain to drive off boost - accelerates quickly from 1000 rev/min in any gear. However your specs will make for a quick car!

Anyone thought about how the one doing the test could be straight up doing it wrong? Sounds stupid, I know, but hey, it happens. If he keeps cranking it until the gauge needle stops moving, it would read around the 200 - 210 mark. Some people just plain don't know how to properly do a compression test.

To OP, yes, 200+ is way, way too high. Look for a number around the 150-170 mark.

Source: Cranking my RB25DET comp gauge pressure up to 205 across the board to perform an (admittedly ghetto) homemade leakdown test just by bumping it until the needle stopped.

I take my reading when the need stops moving as per the book...

When I did my RB20DET I had two comp gauges to use, the lowest set of figures were 149 to 154 psi, the gauge that read higher also achieved a 5psi spread.

post-89296-0-01969300-1384556275_thumb.jpg

post-89296-0-65841800-1384556293_thumb.jpg

Anyone thought about how the one doing the test could be straight up doing it wrong? Sounds stupid, I know, but hey, it happens. If he keeps cranking it until the gauge needle stops moving, it would read around the 200 - 210 mark. Some people just plain don't know how to properly do a compression test.

To OP, yes, 200+ is way, way too high. Look for a number around the 150-170 mark.

Source: Cranking my RB25DET comp gauge pressure up to 205 across the board to perform an (admittedly ghetto) homemade leakdown test just by bumping it until the needle stopped.

Ive never seen the guage keep getting higher with longer cranking, in the first few cranks it hits the number and after that just bounces on that number, the engine just has what it has I don't get how you can make it higher than that.

I just got the reply 210. Cold. Does this mean the head has been shaved previously

There is not necessarily anything wrong with this motor. It may be purpose built as a high compression engine designed to run on race fuel or E85. Back in my youth as a Ford mechanic we used to get cars with high compressions caused by excessive deposits and they were routinely "decoked"... not a term I hear these days. If the engine is in a car you should test drive it with some form of det detection to see if it is detonating. Ask the seller why the compression is so high - did he build it himself or know who did?

Nah its from a half cut car import mob offering start up warranty only. I dont really care about how to do a comp test coz I do know how to do it. Im wondering what are the pros and cons of having a high compression motor

Google will give you a much faster answer.

Nah its from a half cut car import mob offering start up warranty only. I dont really care about how to do a comp test coz I do know how to do it. Im wondering what are the pros and cons of having a high compression motor

High compression is usually associated with a n/a. Low comp with forced induction. You trying to achieving any thing with 9.5ish.1 comp and above has a higher risk of detonation for your RB20det. Ideally for a force induction motor supercharged or turbo would be in the 8-8.5.1 range for reliable safe worry free function. This topic asking the pros and cons goes into a rabbit hole of controversy and opinion. Every engine builder believes what the do and how they build an engine equals to personal beliefs of religion aka everyone is wrong but themselves. I agree with Superben somewhat that no one will give you a correct answer unless you research for yourself. I hate telling someone to go "read" but in this case Google and the search function here on SAU is your best friend.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Came here to say, put all the wiring from the new motor and gearbox in that you can, then throw the stock ECUs in the bin, and get an aftermarket ECU. Should be pretty easy if you can use a multimeter and read a wiring diagram to then use a PNP aftermarket ECU to suit the motors wiring loom, and make the minimal changes you will to get it to work in with the body loom (If any). This will mean you can very easily circumvent/bypass the Park/Neutral start disable switch, and get everything running really easy!
    • If the roof is dual skinned the whole way, IE, there's a "top" metal piece, and a "bottom" metal piece, to slow it down as much as you practically can, you should be able to get an attachment for a spray can/your spray gun, where it is a long, thin flexible hose, and when you're "spraying" it is spraying it in every direction possible. The I'd get that, and feed it through the roof as much and as far as you can. It's basically like fish oiling the car, but you're soaking it in rust converter. Then do the fix like Murray has described having cleaned up the existing metal as much as you humanly can. I'd also throw as much rust converter on that exposed metal before putting the fibreglass/metal filler over everything.   As for welding a replacement in. I've owned my own MIG welder for about 10 years. I've also worked in an industry doing MIG welding for a job for about 3 months dead straight, and we were doing 11.5 hour work days 5 days a week, plus a Saturday 6 hour day. (I then moved over to running the massive CNC plasma as I could understand the technology, and work with the main guy out there). I also f**k around with my welders a bit at home. So what I'm saying here is, I've probably got more hours on a MIG gun than you'll manage to get under your sleeve doing home sorts of jobs over the next 5 years. I also have an ACDC TIG that I got myself a year or two back. I've got a short amount of experience on the TIG only. My home MIG is also presently setup for doing thin sheet metal. Unless I didn't care about how that roof looked, and I just wanted a functional metal roof, and it being out of alignment, warped, and bowed, I would NOT attempt a roof replacement UNLESS I could do it as a whole panel like Murray described where the spot welds were.  Welding has this REALLY annoying thing, where if you want something to be perfectly square, unless you can clamp that thing to damn perfection (Welding fixture table), it is NOT going to be square, so you start to learn, the type of metal you're working with, how thick it is etc, and weld in VERY specific ways, and by knowing how YOU are as a welder, so that as the welds cool, the metal work pulls itself into place. If you want to see some cool tricky shit done, Bennets Customs is an Aussie guy, and he mentions a guy a lot call "Kyle", who is from "Make It Kustom". Watch some of their welding videos, especially on sheet metal. You can use the welder to shrink the steel in, and you can also use the welder to stretch the panel out. When you have the skill level that I have, you can shrink the metal in and out... But never on purpose like those two guys do. You just manage to f**k it all up. Then I smack it around with a hammer till it sits lower than I will want it too, then I shove filler on top and then pray to deitys that I can sand it into some form of sane shape that doesn't look like a dog has taken a shit, after eating a tonne of pumice stone... I'm all for DIY, and for learning, and please, feel free to give it a go, but be aware, you need to live with the consequences of how time consuming it is to do, AND that it's going to look no where near as good as what you can make it look with just some filler now. Oh AND, even once you replace it, it's like to still rust away again eventually, because you'll have missed putting primer and paint on some part of the newly welded in sheet metal, or against part of the existing metal you couldn't get to...   Oh, and to weld all that in, you will need to pull the window out, and strip at least the roof and A Pillars of interior trim and wiring. You'll then need things like the big fire proof/weld spatter proof mats to lay down, OR you'll end up needing to strip the ENTIRE interior to avoid sending it all up in a ball of flames. If you want to see how annoying sheet metal is to weld, head to bunnings, buy there 600x600 1.6mm mild steel (Not GAL!) sheet, and cut a few pieces, and try and weld them together. Then understand, 1.6mm sheet is nearly 50 to 100% THICKER than the cars sheet metal.   The photos I posted before, I'm replacing with 1.2mm thick mild sheet, and it's very easy to blow through both the original steel (Especially if I hit an area that should have probably been cut out a bit more) or straight through the new sheet metal. And I'm doing the floor, which can be hidden easily, and doesn't matter how pretty I make it, as long as it's damn strong! I'm also doing it in a 4WD, that has seen many off road trails, and doesn't need to look that pretty ever
    • This sounds like a perfect excuse to install a Haltech R3.
    • I do believe from context he is talking about a S0/S1 R33 RB25 with associated ECU and Wiring for that, and a manual gearbox into a R34 N/A Auto. I don't have the knowledge of all the pinouts and such but my gut feeling from doing my own conversion is to use as much of the R33 stuff that you can. The "car" wiring is quite seperate from the "Engine" wiring when all things are considered. The only things to truly consider 99% of the time is the cluster, reverse lights and potentially disabling the 'not in P/N' immobilizer circuit.
    • A realistic expectattion of how long it has to last also comes down to.... when do you think you will be banned from registering and driving old petrol powered shitters? It's 27 years since that thing was built. It probably rusted out 15 years ago. It was probably repaired and looked OK for another 10. If you do a similarish bodge job now, or perhaps slightly better with some actual rust conversion and glassing, then.... get another 10-15 years out of it, after which you'll only be permitted by the CCP to drive electric cars manufactured in their Shenzen zone anyway. 
×
×
  • Create New...