Jump to content
SAU Community

Xtreme Motorsports Closed Down?


Recommended Posts

Can the information be posted again if the address of the director and any personal mobiles are blanked out on the images?

Or should I just leave this alone now? Threat does not worry me but I do not want to start trouble with SAU or admins.

You've made your point. Leave it as it is for now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

might i add, the location of where xtreme used to be was listed for lease at the Laing+Simmons Granville around June/July this year, i only saw it because i was waiting for my food from el jannah.
This move/closure has been on the horizon for some time and not only due to this tree collapse.

Edited by pphhhfffttt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like I upset someone..

upset.jpg

Gregg if you feel threatended then this constitutes common assault; also using a carriage service to threaten/ menace is also a criminal offence. I am sure that Forsure has heard of your gang affiliations that would be only too happy to action the threats above, namely: The NSW Police Force and Australian Federal Police (And they always win).

The information that Gregg published is readily available through ASIC searches and the subsequent contradictions he highlights are well founded and deserve a response.

Also of interest, does this mean that a known asbestos building was where your workers were working everyday? The very same ones that you are at pains to mention you will be transitioning to the new business to look after them? Poor Sam and detailers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gregg if you feel threatended then this constitutes common assault; also using a carriage service to threaten/ menace is also a criminal offence. I am sure that Forsure has heard of your gang affiliations that would be only too happy to action the threats above, namely: The NSW Police Force and Australian Federal Police (And they always win).

The information that Gregg published is readily available through ASIC searches and the subsequent contradictions he highlights are well founded and deserve a response.

Also of interest, does this mean that a known asbestos building was where your workers were working everyday? The very same ones that you are at pains to mention you will be transitioning to the new business to look after them? Poor Sam and detailers!

Generally, undisturbed asbestos poses very little risk to people.

The issues get serious when it is damaged; either by impact, paint removal, and rather ironically; fire.

Many of the houses destroyed by fire in Yellow Rock & Winmallee were older houses, which had asbestos present; and the damaged product is causing all sorts of complications in the remediation of peoples blocks for re-building.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally, undisturbed asbestos poses very little risk to people.

The issues get serious when it is damaged; either by impact, paint removal, and rather ironically; fire..

Yeah correct.

Certain things can be done, inspections regularly etc. You'd be surpsirsed how many older buildings have it but it's manageable with the government rules being followed on it and so on. No need to get too excited about that.

Back on topic now... Pretty poor to see death threats for what in a nutshell is 5mins of info gathering that is all public record and readily accessible to anyone in the world... Bit weird things would go that path.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol!!!! Next import that someone buys in NSW could very well come with a body in the boot!!

Someone that is actually capable of going through with some sort of violent retribution would probably not bother sending silly threats through an online forum....keyboard warriors FTW!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gregg if you feel threatended then this constitutes common assault; also using a carriage service to threaten/ menace is also a criminal offence. I am sure that Forsure has heard of your gang affiliations that would be only too happy to action the threats above, namely: The NSW Police Force and Australian Federal Police (And they always win).

The information that Gregg published is readily available through ASIC searches and the subsequent contradictions he highlights are well founded and deserve a response.

Also of interest, does this mean that a known asbestos building was where your workers were working everyday? The very same ones that you are at pains to mention you will be transitioning to the new business to look after them? Poor Sam and detailers!

I agree. I don't know and don't want to know who has threatened Gregg as that's very uncalled for and cowardly.

I don't need anyone to fight my battles as I can handle them myself. Thankyou

The asbestos was there and I mentioned it to the landlord from day one and did my research and it was not at all any harm unless it was disturbed until when the tree fell.

Sam hasn't been working with us since October/November 2012 and believe he works at Sports Auto Group now.

John the detailer is a Sub Contractor and is mobile and still does work for us and will be doing work for us once we are back in action.

Generally, undisturbed asbestos poses very little risk to people.

The issues get serious when it is damaged; either by impact, paint removal, and rather ironically; fire.

Many of the houses destroyed by fire in Yellow Rock & Winmallee were older houses, which had asbestos present; and the damaged product is causing all sorts of complications in the remediation of peoples blocks for re-building.

A 100% exact. Its harder than everyone thinks.

Yeah correct.

Certain things can be done, inspections regularly etc. You'd be surpsirsed how many older buildings have it but it's manageable with the government rules being followed on it and so on. No need to get too excited about that.

Back on topic now... Pretty poor to see death threats for what in a nutshell is 5mins of info gathering that is all public record and readily accessible to anyone in the world... Bit weird things would go that path.

The threats are cowardly and uncalled for and I wish I could find who the hell it was so I can give them a big f**ken slap to wake up and there is no need for this.

Whoever it is man up and there is no need for your threats. Reveal yourself or suffer the consequences.

Lol!!!! Next import that someone buys in NSW could very well come with a body in the boot!!

Someone that is actually capable of going through with some sort of violent retribution would probably not bother sending silly threats through an online forum....keyboard warriors FTW!

Its pathetic and childish behaviour.

Usually if dodgy people are trying to hide something, they resort to the actions we saw above.

Not necessarily as I had nothing to do with their actions and not responsible for what other people say or do.

I cant control everyone and everybody and if they want to make threats they can cop it instead of the innocent people that had no affiliations with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Generally, undisturbed asbestos poses very little risk to people.

The issues get serious when it is damaged; either by impact, paint removal, and rather ironically; fire.

Many of the houses destroyed by fire in Yellow Rock & Winmallee were older houses, which had asbestos present; and the damaged product is causing all sorts of complications in the remediation of peoples blocks for re-building.

Dale whilst I would generally agree, and this used to be the case, the Work Health and Safety Act (NSW) no longer accepts this as the case. You must take "all reasonably practicable steps" as a PCBU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah correct.

Certain things can be done, inspections regularly etc. You'd be surpsirsed how many older buildings have it but it's manageable with the government rules being followed on it and so on. No need to get too excited about that.

Back on topic now... Pretty poor to see death threats for what in a nutshell is 5mins of info gathering that is all public record and readily accessible to anyone in the world... Bit weird things would go that path.

Ashley under new WHS laws you are incorrect, and this is my area of expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ashley under new WHS laws you are incorrect, and this is my area of expertise.

Seemed to be OK for a friend who is going through it at the moment, precautions covered etc. It's not as if the place has to be torn down and rebuilt or anything radical... It can be managed was the point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: my post, wasn't aimed at your specifically Joe, just a general statement/observation. People go down that path most likely because they have something to hide, which you are prodding, and that they are generally dodgy.

It's good that you're still replying to posts. Not really sure what the full story is, but some of the evidence surfacing is interesting.

Good cop, bad cop.....same cop?

Plausible lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The threats are cowardly and uncalled for. Reveal yourself or suffer the consequences.

um ...

haha i had the same thoughts.

Edited by GH05T
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thank you and appreciate your comments.

Good cop, bad cop.....same cop?

Lol...I don't threaten people.

Never have and never will. Its not my nature.

Thank god this establishment has been closed.

I laughed and had to register when you said you have never threatened anyone. Except for when I bought a car from you and the engine blew up 5 weeks after I owned it. I took it to your 'mechanic' and i magically had 5100 km on the car from when I bought it voiding my statutory warranty, and you threatened me over email that you would sue me for everything thing i had and i was not you 'f**k' with you.

Good riddance to this dodgy business.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There are a few variables here, some are relevant but not critical (IMHO) to help answer your question. The two major things: 1) Ignoring anything to do with forced induction - all engines have their own natural torque curve, and it will ALWAYS roll over higher in the rpm.  There is a fixed relationship between power and torque.  When dealing with kw and nm, the relationship between them is roughly: kw = (rpm * nm) / 9549 nm = (kw / rpm) * 9549 The peak torque of an engine (without boost) will typically climb until somewhere nearish the middle of it's operating rev range, give or take a bit - then start dropping again.   The nearer the minimum and maximum rpm of the engine the steeper that drop off tends to be. 2) Boost simply increases the density of the air going into the engine, which inflates the torque at that point.  The ramp up in the torque curve you see on a turbo engine is due to the boost rising, but it's essentially just multiplying the torque you'd see if it was naturally aspirated.  The roll over you see at the end will typically be what would have always happened with the engine, whether it was naturally aspirated or turbocharged.   If the torque never started dropping then power would climb infinitely. The cool thing about this is you absolutely can tune the power delivery to suit the needs of the owner and/or the limitations of the car, and I regularly do this.    With modern turbos we've got to the point where a setup that someone may run well over 20psi of boost with could actually reach target boost well under 4000rpm if the tuner/owner WANTED to - and a lot of people seem to do this when there is actually no realistic benefit, generally it just adds a massive amount of strain to the engine and drivetrain and often actually makes the car harder to drive. As a general rule I tend to tune the boost curves for cars I tune to reach a "useful" torque level through the rev range and will often end up with a curve that ramps hard to a point, then creeps for the rest of the rev range - not to make the boost curve "soft" as such, but more to make sure its neither laggy nor pointlessly violent in it's delivery.   There have been cars I've tuned to be almost like a centrifugal supercharger (or naturally-aspirated-ish) where they actually only hit like 8psi of boost before opening the gate, then ramp up the next 10psi over the rev range... if the car is "loose enough" to drive. On the flip side I've tuned a car that had stock cams and the engine's natural torque curve fell over HARD in the higher rpm and resulted in a slightly awkward power curve to work with, in that case I actually started ramping up boost to boost torque in a way to offset the engines "NA" torque drop off... at peak rpm actually running a good 5psi+ more boost that what the "flat curve" would have defined.  This gave the owner an extra 500rpm or so of useable rev range, and had a fairly solid impact on times he was running at motorsport events due to being able to hold gears a bit longer and also falling into a more useful part of the rev range in the following gears. Here's an example of an RB in a GTSt I've done the "softened" boost curve to not pointlessly ramp straight to the max boost target early in the rpm, but still made sure it builds useful boost.  If you went in the car you'd not guess at all that the boost curve was doing anything "weird", it feels like it spools immediately and accelerates relentlessly (traction dependent) and holds to max rpm.   I don't know if you'd guess what the boost curve was doing by driving the car, or even looking at the dyno plot... but imho it suits the combination.  
    • therefore on the first examples, as we see, changing cams (graph 2) influences the quantity of torque at high revs its OK for me. so a tuner can act on the wastegate via the boost controller to increase the boost at high revs? on the last example, the boost does not decrease ok, but the torque does. this can come from cams etc etc ok. but on the other curves the boost is not constant, it increases, this is what I find strange to my mind. even more so if it comes from the relief valve. sorry I'm very new don't blame me. in my mind I couldn't imagine how the boost could be higher after the spool  
    • right, but fundamentally, for a given mechanical setup, you are either using all the torque (and therefore power) it will give, or you are choosing to run it less efficiently. Many tuners will have a practice of identifying peak available torque and then winding it back a couple of % for safety, but unless you are working around a very specific issue like a weak gearbox, there is nothing to be gained by making 20 or 30% less than the engine can
    • You can manipulate the torque delivery by ramping in boost gently, then throwing it all in after peak torque to keep the torque flat. It's nothing magical.
    • Tuning the wastegate to do it. That is all. Most people want the boost to not fall off like the most recent example. Those also look like dyno runs with an Auto/Torque converter setup, which does fun things to the graph. The boost tapers down like that because the turbo cannot supply the same amount of air at 7000rpm that it can at 3000 in terms of PSI. That, or the tuner has decided that it tapering off like that is what someone chose to do. IF you have a wastegate that can't bleed enough air to slow the turbine, and IF that turbo can flow enough air to feed the engine at high RPM, you get 'boost creep' which is a rise of boost pressure beyond what you are capable of controlling and/or want. None of these show symptoms of that, but if you had a run that was 20psi at 3000rpm, and 27psi at 7000rpm, it could be an example of that. Or simply that the person wanted boost later for their own reasons... The dyno graphs don't always show the full context.
×
×
  • Create New...