Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I have been on this page for a little while but only used it for a reference sort of thing. But now I thought I would try my luck asking a question. I recently got my 33 gtst tuned and it has a flat spot in power curve. I basically just want to see if someone has had a similar problem and what they did to resolve it.


Mods are.

•Haltech platinum pro plugin.

•Hypergear atr43g3 on standard exh mani

•Nismo 740cc injectors

•Ebay intercooler kit

•3" bellmouth single piece dump pipe to 3" delete pipe and steps up to 4" before rear muffler.

•Standard plenum

•3" intake to pod filter and 2.5" cooler piping.

•Tomei fpr


Car makes 255.7rwkw on 20psi with bp98 which seems low compared to other peoples results.


Have checked for boost leaks with none found.

Tuner said that he thinks restriction is exhaust manifold but have heard of standard ones still getting 300kw etc.


Has anyone had something similar?


Regards Spencer

post-104841-0-31871700-1384330400_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434952-flat-spot-in-power-curve/
Share on other sites

Na I didnt drop the exhaust because I was pretty confident it wasn't a restriction at the time. Might do it once I get it back on the dyno after I change induction pipe to 4" and maybe see if there is a pressure drop through intercooler

I have seen over 400kw through a 3 inch intake too, infact the 430kw 33 had a Z32 afm... No point going bigger than the AFM unless you ditch it and go MAP sensor.

Just looking at the graph, it seems you are missing a chunk of boost in the midrange, did you get a boost plot by chance?

That is a whack result. Scottynm35 has seen huge power through stock mani, Not sure what your issue is, many things to check but I hope you can get it sorted out.

E85 is a hell of a thing. Can't compare a car which is tuned on petrol with one which is tuned on ethanol - the nastiness which is the stock manifold gets covered up a bit if using a very knock resistant fuel.

E85 coveres up 200kw... Yeh right. :P

Anyway, 250 isn't it's limit surely, not to mention, where is his midrange? It either has no boost in the midrange, or no timing, probably due to a big restriction somewhere. Cam timing?

Did I mention my closed 1.5 inch Varex exhaust makes more than 250? ;)

I wasn't referring to the 250kw thing specifically - so much as how ridiculous comparing a big turbo high octane combination with a small turbo pump gas setup... there is an issue there, but mentioning a 400+kw ethanol setup is probably not being helpful for perspective.

I wasn't referring to the 250kw thing specifically - so much as how ridiculous comparing a big turbo high octane combination with a small turbo pump gas setup... there is an issue there, but mentioning a 400+kw ethanol setup is probably not being helpful for perspective.

It proves the standard manifold can flow a lot more than the power he is making. Many people (myself included) have made much more than 250kw through standard manifolds on 98. Why argue against scottys valid point that in this case manifold flow is not the restriction?

It proves the standard manifold can flow a lot more than the power he is making. Many people (myself included) have made much more than 250kw through standard manifolds on 98. Why argue against scottys valid point that in this case manifold flow is not the restriction?

Because I was bored at home with manflu and brain wasn't working very well - my bad! Forgot I even posted that. There is clearly an issue that isn't the exhaust manifold causing it.

post-104841-0-53226600-1384589445_thumb.jpgI changed my induction pipe to solid 4 inch yesterday instead of it stepping down to 3 inch. Tuner is going to print me out a picture of boost plot so will show that when I get it. Also going to change actuator to 14psi and run an eboost street to have high and low boost and get retuned.

Here is a photo of my timing map

That timing map is pretty average. Looks like a huge reduction at around 5krpm-20psi drops like 3-5deg then back up at 6k. I'd imagine that'd feel pretty flat through there.

Did the tuner say anything about the engine wanting to knock?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I replaced the whole clutch line with the chase bays braided hose, I think it removes that loop, is it the short hose that comes immediately off the slave or is there a drawing in the manual to find what you’re referring to? It was just re-bled when I upgraded to the nismo slave, old slave worked fine but I thought that might help, didn’t change a thing. It’s like the first half of the pedal is pushing air and then when it finally actuates the master the friction zone is tiny. Makes it practically impossible to launch the car
    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
    • I would agree, unless you need something specific to the HV motor/battery side repaired or investigated, any mechanic will be able to perform normal services, but if you prefer, maybe look for a mechanic who regularly services/repairs Nissans, the VQ engines are pretty common in the Nissan lineup.  Sorry, I can't make any suggestions, I don't live in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...