Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In the Daily Telegraph today, watch the video too.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/reading-the-riot-act-to-dodgy-car-dealers-over-odometer-tricks/story-fni0cx12-1226759295622

NSW Fair Trading and the Motor Traders' Association have warned the odometers of more and more vehicles - imports in particular - were being tampered with because, as things stand, "unscrupulous" car yards can get away with it.

But under a plan being developed by Fair Trading with Roads and Maritime Services (RMS), cars bound for Australia would have to be accompanied by papers showing their odometer reading at the time of deregistration in that country. This is not a requirement at the moment.

294847-e48e866a-4c42-11e3-95c1-9e9b6c573

John Rolfe in front of a questionable Toyota Supra on Parramatta Rd, Concord. Source: News Limited

Fair Trading is also exploring whether the Motor Dealers Act should be amended so car yards have to provide potential buyers with such information. Then dealers wouldn't be able to plead ignorance - which is enough to get them off the hook under current laws.

"Odometer tampering is a problem and it's on the increase," Fair Trading investigations director David Byrne said. The main source of imported used cars is Japan - about 5000 cars a year.

A web-based service which claims to be able to ascertain odometer readings on cars from Japan said 90 out of 100 odometers checked at the request of Australians were found to have been wound back.

In NSW there were 13 breaches in 2010-11 involving odometer tampering, 20 in 2011-12, 15 in 2012-13 and seven in less than four-and-a-half months this financial year, Fair Trading data shows.

Action is already on the way, with the penalty for tampering about to be doubled to $22,000.

Public Defender began investigating tampering after a tip from a victim, who pointed out a 2002 Toyota Supra. Auction papers he supplied - which I could not verify - said the car had done 91,170km when sold in Japan. This week I found the car on Sydney's Auto Alley. The odometer read 48,260km.

When it was put to the dealer, who cannot be named for legal reasons, that the odometer had been wound back, he said it wouldn't surprise him: "If that's happened it's happened on Japanese soil … I'm not the one who tampered with the odometer."

The dealer said the yard tried to limit its exposure to cars with tampered odometers but it was "rife" in Japan. There was no way of telling if a car had been driven further than its dashboard indicated.

Later the dealer rang to claim the auction papers I showed him may have been altered but he could not provide proof. Regardless, the Supra would be "removed from sale", he said.

A good step forward?

Edited by colourclassic
When it was put to the dealer, who cannot be named for legal reasons, that the odometer had been wound back, he said it wouldn't surprise him: "If that's happened it's happened on Japanese soil … I'm not the one who tampered with the odometer."

Right-o ;)

Well, when their stoopid enough to post Japanese agent shot videos with the original mileage visible, the car in their possession and the car arrives with 90k kms less, then it shouldn't be too hard.

However is that good enough for the law? I dunno.

You're able to request for the de-registration papers when the vehicle was in Japan.. it shows you the exact details, the KMs, etc...

I like how dealers always blame the Japanese winding down KMs, etc.. they're a very honest society, they wouldn't do any of that shit. Even when the tsunami took out a town, ATMs were destroy and money was floating about.. no one looted, no one picked up a single note floating about. So what says they want to even wind their KMs back?

It's all done here before compliance.

You're able to request for the de-registration papers when the vehicle was in Japan.. it shows you the exact details, the KMs, etc...

I like how dealers always blame the Japanese winding down KMs, etc.. they're a very honest society, they wouldn't do any of that shit. Even when the tsunami took out a town, ATMs were destroy and money was floating about.. no one looted, no one picked up a single note floating about. So what says they want to even wind their KMs back?

It's all done here before compliance.

Interesting idea, and I agree with you about Japanese culture. However I believe there are a lot of people of a certain ethnic group that is not Japanese that are a big part of the car business. I've seen details of it in the past, however can't remember where I saw it.

so those dealers blaming the Japanese docks can go get fuarked...

The cars in Japan are all auctioned with usually 100 000+ kms on them some how they end up here with like 1/3 of the kms. I've seen it with my own eyes, same car in an auction site, de-registration papers, then blame at XYZ dealer in Parramatta Road with 1/3 the kms.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • @robbo_rb180 I already have a NEO head on the shitbox 😎 Just needs beehive springs so I can rev it past the 8600 rpm limiter, then again pointless too, turbo is out of puff lol. Wen da gods let me win lotto eh?
    • Everyone I know with a90 supra at time attack aren't having issues with 3-5 fast laps so far and one is decent powered one too. Saw a k24 swapped 86 with a 8hp70 and big slicks and aero which had no drama's at QR and Manton Park. I've stuck a 25 row cooler in my setup with 8hp45/50 in the hopes of keeping the oil cool as I plan on some racing next year that 20-30min sessions. I've also geared my car so won't be using 7th and 8th gear too. @Dose Pipe Sutututu just needs to get that samsonas in already and have that tassie guy fit a head and rev it too 11ty thousand rpm. 
    • My embedded systems thoughts have me sitting with GTS on this. Variation between same phone hardware, should be small. However, the internal "intensity" or "volume" amount that say Google passes to the app, will be quite different, as the underlying hardware will be passing different levels for the same volume to the Google OS. Until the app creator has had each individual phone, and set benchmarks and calibrations for each, the amount of error can be quite huge.   It can even be observed by using different phones, recording the same noise, and then playing it back, they end up soon ding different. A big reason for it, is even the different types of mics used in phones have different responses, and different frequency ranges. Then you need to get into the DSP, and the variations in those, their sample rates which then effect their frequency range, and then the quality of the DSP, and what type of hardware conversion they do to for the ADC within the DSP. Oh, and let's not forget at the low level phones are designed to cutout loud sounds. It's one of the reasons they suck in really loud environments (eg concerts). The louder you yell, the more you'll get cutout too Note DSP is Digital Signal Processor ADC is the analogue to data converter. I don't have any real data on what the variation would truly be, however, chat GPT says in general, their output is typically between +/-2dB to +/-5dB of what you're really measuring. So realistically, anything from 4 to 10dB variation is possible even with the same devices.
    • 'sif the error will be that low!
    • I do know where there is a fair few 😉
×
×
  • Create New...