Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Great work by Williams to get a front row lockout. Going to make for an interesting race. We'll get to see how the mercs handle traffic (hamo) when they are actually racing for position and not just having the traffic move out of the way. We'd sometimes see Vettel really struggle in traffic and only blaze away once in open air. Wonder if the mercs will do the same.

ffs Ch10 missing all the pit stops

Yeah that was fairly shit.

"And now we see the drivers heading in for their first pitstops, I wonder if........."

Chanel 10 logic:

"I think its a good time to grab our first commercial break"

*conversation may not be 100% accurate. I know how much people like accuracy :)

That race had the potential to be great, then It was rather boring. Hope these Mercedes start breaking soon. A few issues are starting to appear. Imagine if they lost the Drivers championship now. How would you feel being Rosberg/Hamilton to have an unbeatable car for half the year and still lose

Edited by 89CAL

i think that would be amazing...

yeah what annoyed me is that williams decided to aim for 3/4 and not bother covering the mercs... pretty much let them win and manage their cars reliabilty easier...

  • Like 1

Well the Williams are harder on types so they probably tried to stretch it out to improve their later pace/grip

Funny how there was no replay of what actually happened when Kyvyat's (how on earth do you spell it) suspension let go

Kimi having a very boring year in the Ferrari so far. In the back of my mind I thought this might happen but really hoped it wouldn't

Kimi used to be hugely fast, and even looked the goods in the Lotus. But its beginning to look like he only went to Ferrari to retire and really isn't terribly interested. Will be huge lols if they dump him again mid-conract!

Couldn't agree more about Williams whole approach to racing there. That was shit. I know they needs a good points haul, but someone needs to tell them you get more points for 1st or 2nd than 3rd & 4th... The team just refused to take the race to Mercedes. Dissapointing, and probably pretty stupid, because their car was obviously very well suited to that track. They may not get another chance for a win until Monza. They had the pace to match Mercedes, their tyres didn't grain any more than Mercedes. They just didn't bother trying to race them from the pit wall. Two thumbs down Williams. If you don't race to win, what's the point?

Edited by hrd-hr30

From the Beebeecee:

Mercedes, realising they were able to look after their tyres better than Williams, brought Rosberg in on lap 11.

Had Williams responded with Massa on the next lap, the Brazilian would almost certainly have been able to rejoin still ahead but Williams were worried the two remaining stints would then be too long for their car.

"From all the information we had at that point and everything we knew at that time and now know, I don't think we could have got to the end of the race by doing it," head of vehicle performance Smedley said.

"Even the strategy we did, we were managing tyres and tyre wear, trying to keep wheelspin and lateral acceleration down in certain parts of the corner with driving styles, with electronic settings.

"So it would have been fairly gung-ho and brave to have gone for it on that lap, and you look like a bit of an idiot if you finish your tyres with five or six laps to go and cars come streaming past you."

It did look all a bit weak kneed but there again the constructors is tight:

1 Mercedes 301

2 Red Bull Racing-Renault 143

3 Ferrari 98

4 Force India-Mercedes 87

5 Williams-Mercedes 85

6 McLaren-Mercedes 72

7 STR-Renault 12

8 Lotus-Renault 8

9 Marussia-Ferrari 2

10 Sauber-Ferrari 0

11 Caterham-Renault 0

What chance Ferrari will dump Kimi for Kyvet - does Alonso get to pick his team mate again and say no like he allegedly did to Hulkenberg?

Edited by djr81

How the f*k are RBR 2nd in the championship with all Vettel's DNF's

Still trying to figure out how TR has so few points given the are often as not quicker than the grown ups in the other team.

Also Horner has tipped a bucket on Renault. Next year Infiniti RedBull Honda??????? Apparently not.

"We need to work together as partners. There will not be another engine in the back of the car next year, but we want to be competitive and we want to run at the front," said Horner.

"Something needs to happen because whatever's being done there at the moment isn't working.

"It's not our business, it's not our responsibility. We're the end user and it's just frustrating that it's not where it needs to be at the moment," added the Briton.

Kimi used to be hugely fast, and even looked the goods in the Lotus. But its beginning to look like he only went to Ferrari to retire and really isn't terribly interested. Will be huge lols if they dump him again mid-conract!

Couldn't agree more about Williams whole approach to racing there. That was shit. I know they needs a good points haul, but someone needs to tell them you get more points for 1st or 2nd than 3rd & 4th... The team just refused to take the race to Mercedes. Dissapointing, and probably pretty stupid, because their car was obviously very well suited to that track. They may not get another chance for a win until Monza. They had the pace to match Mercedes, their tyres didn't grain any more than Mercedes. They just didn't bother trying to race them from the pit wall. Two thumbs down Williams. If you don't race to win, what's the point?

I think thats not really true. The Ferrari looks pretty horrible at times. Alonso struggles with it sometime and Kimi is probably in the same boat as Vettel. Vettel is not all of a sudden just a crap driver. He is struggling a bit in the car, where as Dan is doing much better.

I think Kimi's intentions at Ferrari were to be fighting at the front, Lotus was never going to have a good car this year. But its not turning out right because I think the car (and the engine to a degree) arent as strong as some people thought, including Ferrari themselves.

Last year when Kimi won the Aus GP, I watched every driver going around turns 3 and 4 and pretty much every one of them was sliding the car around. Kimi was unbelievebly good around those 2 corners, was so planted and nice around the corner.

This year the thing was sliding all over the place. I think its just 50% the car (new regulations alot to do with that) and 50% not suiting his driving style

I am a pretty big fan of his though lol. But still I don't think he is the kinda guy that would be in Formula 1, JUST to be there

The walk of bishes was the best so far this year. :)

It's pretty funny though, have all these girls lined up clapping just to have 3 drivers and a team member walk straight past. I don't get it, but I'm sure not complaining lol

I am (well, was I guess) a big Kimi fan. He just isn't doing the job at all this year in the Ferrari. Rationalise it any way you want, but after 8 races his best result is 7th and avg finishing position is 9.5 - just in the top 10! Alonso on the other hand, has been on the podium once and has a string of 4ths. How bad can the car be?

Kimi is a woeful 12th in the WDC only ahead of shitboxes like Lotus, Sauber and co. Not exactly impressive.

Last year everyone was comparing him to Alonso...All I can say is that Lotus must have been a good thing!

Vettel, as you point out, is clearly struggling this year too, but his stuggling is a position or two behind his team-mate when his car doesn't have obvious problems. It's not at all comparable to Kimi's (lack of) performaces.

Edited by hrd-hr30

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...