Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So you're saying a car doing a 1.5 60ft time will have the same mph as a car with a 2.2 60ft time?? I dont think so.

60 footers are only an indication on how well your car hooks up and leaves the hole. Doesnt have anything to do with power.

Is it being implied that a bad 60ft will result in higher or lower trap speed?

Also, not hating, but can anyone explain the allure to owning the most powerful anything, anywhere? Would just like to know the motive behind it, as its quite different from the fastest etc.

Or is this more so the car is being built to a purpose and it just might happen to also be the most power, which is a lot more reasonable in my mind.. But building a motor to simply have it be the most powerful I can't understand.

Wtf now that rb25 make no power comment is there lol I looked twice it was gone before! Well im here to prove you haters wrong

Haha, sorry you thought it was hate, all cos I left out the smiley face. I thought it was pretty obviously sarcastic considering that this is a skyline forum! Sorry for the confusion.

Are you planning on putting your car down the strip?

It is the most powerful RB25 in the world, but isn't Australia based so not so relevant. The one in the UK from a few years ago was also up there in power

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Is it being implied that a bad 60ft will result in higher or lower trap speed?

Always lower. BUT if the car has huge amounts of power it will still post up a good mph. as stated 60 footers show how good a car hooks up and well the driver can drive the thing out of the hole.

For example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_adV15DzTo

Is it being implied that a bad 60ft will result in higher or lower trap speed?

Also, not hating, but can anyone explain the allure to owning the most powerful anything, anywhere? Would just like to know the motive behind it, as its quite different from the fastest etc.

Or is this more so the car is being built to a purpose and it just might happen to also be the most power, which is a lot more reasonable in my mind.. But building a motor to simply have it be the most powerful I can't understand.

The car was built to be a bit of everything. Certainly not max power. But that comes as a bonus. As I am not going to go down the drag only route I dont really care for times. I will take it down to see what it runs but im not going overboard on trying to run crazy times.

Also im not here to argue about what 60ft times mean and how they affect mph. Though I will say, having a slower 60ft time essentially determines where your run starts from. So it will affect your top end mph. An auto set up on slicks will not run same mph as a manual on street tyres, ive seen it happen. Anyway back on topic, I just wanted to see where my 25 stood against others that have been built in aus.

Rb25s dont make power?? Lol ok

My car might be back on dyno this week

So you're saying a car doing a 1.5 60ft time will have the same mph as a car with a 2.2 60ft time?? I dont think so.

You have much to learn grasshopper.

Lol dude ive personally ran identical runs but different 60ft times and the mph can vary 2 or 3mph. Thats a shit 118 run. Take that up to 140mph and the difference will be over 5mph. Explain to me how a car slipping and sliding thru 1st and second can possibly get the same top speed over a given distance compared to a car that just grips up and goes?? Im curious to hear your answer.

You are just dragging your own topic off topic, there are too many variables to consider and you will most definitely not be the only person here who has done enough drag racing to form opinions on patterns - it'll just turn into a flamefest. For what it's worth I've run everywhere from 12.6 to 13.5 with 1.9 to 2.5s 60ft times and trapped between 110-112mph for practically all of them (and launch was not the only thing that changed - tyre pressure, cleanness of gear shifts etc all were tested or perhaps not done as well as possible every time), I tended to see a bigger difference in trap speed when I missed a gear or hit a limiter than on a bad 60ft. Not saying this will be the same for everyone, just saying it's part of my experience.

Here are a couple of time slip break downs from past runs from my car - two completely different events, I was ALWAYS in that speed range. Different tyres for the 12.6, same power.

0-60 Foot ET: 2.247
1/8 Mile ET: 8.849
1/8 Mile MPH: 87.240
1/4 Mile ET: 13.330
1/4 Mile MPH: 111.580
0-60 Foot ET: 1.906
1/8 Mile ET: 8.186
1/8 Mile MPH: 88.880
1/4 Mile ET: 12.634
1/4 Mile MPH: 111.300
I am sure with 600kw things might change a bit of course haha
  • Like 1

Well I did say im not here to argue the point but if it keeps getting brought up im all for hearing others opinions. Got a touch up tune on the 33 last night, cold ambient temps but on 24psi highest intake temp was 31deg! Awesome results for the new cooler. Will have it on dyno soon to see exactly what the difference is and also to wind the boost up.

Yep, thought it'd be worth seeing that to ponder on if nothing else - they're all on dragtimes.com for an R33 GTS25t Skyline, I put them in there years ago so I haven't just filtered out ones to prove a point.

Anyway yes - dyno results sound like a good thing, is it going on today? And how high was it getting before? Good luck, again :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
    • Damn you’ve done well, definitely snapping necks.
    • Great weekend and event. Open fire at the caravan park, perfect weather all day and a great feed and a couple of drinks at at awesome country pub.
×
×
  • Create New...