Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys had a bit of a search but couldn't find my answer.

ive installed a plazmaman throttle body and plenum

I hooked a compressor up to my intake to pressure test the system whilst doing so found that it was leaking around my tps.

I removed it and sure enough there was a fair amount of air coming out from the end of the throttle shaft seal. it starts to leak at about 14psi and gets worse up to 22psi where I stopped as that's around where itll be getting tuned at.

just want to check if this is normal.

I called plazmaman and they told me that its completely normal and it wont be noticed also that I shouldn't have been doing this as its a static pressure 20psi and so on.

any input from experience would be much appreciated

It shouldn't do that. I can accept that no seal is perfect and that there might be a small leak, but if it is a lot of air, then that it wrong. Having said that, what you think is a lot of air and what I think is a lot of air are likely to be quite different.

In addition, kick the Plazmaman phone person in the snatch for being stupid. There is no difference between being put under 20psi internal pressure on a purely static basis and having the air flow past. Knobheads!

lol well it does seem like quite a bit of air to me but who knows, I guess when it goes in for a tune up ill see what unigroup think.. I didn't think there should be a difference with the static vs dynamic thing but didn't want to seem like a knob head arguing the point if I was wrong

haha I gave the fitting I used to hook up the compressor back to its owner.. on my hand it felt like the amount you would expect to come out of a 1 or 2mm id hose at that pressure.. not the most accurate guess but a worrying amount to me, even with the tps on you can feel it blowing out on your hands.. my hands are all that sensitive either, no cheek up against it needed

I would make sure there are zero leaks before taking it to them. In fact you want zero mechanical issues when you arrive there so they can smoke it and get on with tuning unhindered.

Time is money and it only ends up frustrating for both them and you.

I realize this wolverine but how am I to determine if this is an issue when the manufacturer is saying its normal and not to be worried about.. without getting a second opinion from someone who knows what there talking about such as yavus or mark at unigroup

it was alex I spoke to, he was quite helpful through the original purchase stages.

How would I have it proven to leak for them when they dissaprove of a static pressure test.. btw just to check before this goes further, the regulator on the compressor was showing quite a higher pressure but my assumption is that it was leaking out the valves as both my boost gauges in the car where what I took the readings off..

Yeah might do, I would prefer to have a definite that it's an issue first before complaining getting a new one and finding its the same.. i I called yavus he said it is normal and more common in aftermarket tb's as long as it's not excessive.. I have a feeling this may be excessive though

Yavus is going to tune so if he is happy with it then you should be sweet.

I have had cars back and forth from tuners over the years due to minor niggling issues and I was always lumped with the bill so I am a big fan of taking a week or so extra to get the car 100% mechanically right before tuning.

Yeah I would definitely like to have it 100% but I don't have any other way of having it tested, unless you have suggestions..

The car was being tuned and with a couple of other small faults, he said there was a loud hiss with high boost so I'm trying to find it, it was originally thought to bbe around the intake runners but with the compressor and some soapy water I think I've eliminated that, I found that I accidentally put the check valve in the wrong way for my carbon canister solenoid so I fixed that which was making noise with a bit of pressure from the compressor. I'm hoping that was it if not it must be this tb. I don't think I have another option other than back to the tuner

They already did smoke test it, couldn't find it as the smoke test only goes to 5psi and it doesn't pop it's head until beyond that, not sure if me testing it cold allowed it to not show itself I figured cold would be better as nothing would have expanded..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
    • As I said, there's trade offs to jamming EVERYTHING in. Timing, resources etc, being the huge ones. Calling out the factory ECU has nothing to do with it, as it doesn't do any form of fancy boost control. It's all open loop boost control. You mention the Haltech Nexus, that's effectively two separate devices jammed into one box. What you quote about it, is proof for that. So now you've lost flexibility as a product too...   A product designed to do one thing really well, will always beat other products doing multiple things. Also, I wouldn't knock COTS stuff, you'd be surprised how many things are using it, that you're probably totally in love with As for the SpaceX comment that we're working directly with them, it's about the type of stuff we're doing. We're doing design work, and breaking world firsts. If you can't understand that I have real world hands on experience, including in very modern tech, and actually understand this stuff, then to avoid useless debates where you just won't accept fact and experience, from here on, it seems you'd be be happy I (and possibly anyone with knowledge really) not reply to your questions, or input, no matter how much help you could be given to help you, or let you learn. It seems you're happy reading your data sheets, factory service manuals, and only want people to reinforce your thoughts and points of view. 
    • I don't really understand because clearly it's possible. The factory ECU is running on like a 4 MHz 16-bit processor. Modern GDI ECUs have like 200 MHz superscalar cores with floating point units too. The Haltech Nexus has two 240 MHz CPU cores. The Elite 2500 is a single 80 MHz core. Surely 20x the compute means adding some PID boost control logic isn't that complicated. I'm not saying clock speed is everything, but the requirements to add boost control to a port injection 6 cylinder ECU are really not that difficult. More I/O, more interrupt handlers, more working memory, etc isn't that crazy to figure out. SpaceX if anything shows just how far you can get arguably doing things the "wrong" way, ie x86 COTS running C++ on Linux. That is about as far away from the "correct" architecture as it gets for a real time system, but it works anyways. 
    • Holy hell! That is absolutely stunning! Great work!!!
×
×
  • Create New...