Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 105
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Flavio Briatore (spelling?) controls Webers driving contract, and happens to manage Renaults F1 team.

But in order to get aride at Renault Trulli or Alonso need to get the boot, and considering their performances of late, especially Trulli who received a warning to lift his game...it doesnt appear likely.

I dont think Weber is much of a chance of going to Toyota, my thoughts, Briator needs to do something to ensure his driver, Weber fetches the money he is worth, another season in an uncompetitive car like Toyota may mean that Webers demand falls as other drivers appear and become available.

I read that Jacques Villuneuve may be back in the picture at Williams if RS leaves.... i think JV would make for a better teammate then RS, and i dotn think JV would be looking for big money...and is probably keen to prove he can still win races....

Who knows... but i hope its Williams or Renault, not Jaguar or Toyota.

Ralf isn't going to drive for Williams in 05.

Odds are Webber will go to Williams. His contract has a clause where by the USGP, if the Jag isn't competative he can look for another drive. He needs to win the USGP to remain a Jag man in 05.

I dont see a return to Williams by Jacques Villuneuve but instead see both Mark Webber and Anthony Davidson driving for Williams next year. Davidson's times in the Friday practice sessions have been super impressive so he would make an interesting partner for Webber at Williams.

Although a new twist came up the other day in that apparently Ferrari recently made enquires into Mark Webbers contract. I personally expect Ferrari to replace RB one year out from when MS plans to retire with someone they think they can groom to be the next world champ. I'd prefer to see Webber in a Williams to see if he's more than just a driver and whether given the resources can help develop a team, but putting him in a red machine next to Michael would be interesting for a year.

mmm, I thought Ferrari had been pretty clear that they wanted Alonso when MS goes?

It would be a very sad state of affairs in JV came back to drive for williams, I just don't see that happening....I think Williams are just trying to beat down Weber's price. And it would be good to see Anthony Davidson step up he has been testing there and doing well for a while.

BTW how well has Flavio Briatore (renault boss) done with spotting young drivers! He should be able to fund the renault team for years just by selling Alonso and Weber's contracts to another team :D

BTW how well has Flavio Briatore (renault boss) done with spotting young drivers!  He should be able to fund the renault team for years just by selling Alonso and Weber's contracts to another team :rant:

ucking oath mate, he certainlly will.

His contract has a clause where by the USGP, if the Jag isn't competative he can look for another drive.

I woke up at 2:45 Monday morning and watched the USGP live, I have no problem at all doing this even with working that day, as long as I get to see my beloved F1. (No comments on the features of VCR's pls :Oops: ) But at 4:25am with 6 or sumfing laps to go, the Costworth lets go again and Marko gets another DNF while in a point paying position. So I guess one thing is for sure out of all this Mark WILL goto another team.

I've actually just read that the performance clause in Webbers contract is that Jaguar have to be in the top 6 by the end of the Hungarian GP. So what that basically means is that they have to score at least 13 MORE points than Sauber (and 6 more points than Toyota) in the next 4 races.

I can't see that happening. So if its the case and come the end of the Hungarian GP Webber can start to actively seek a new contract. AND if Williams are in no position to challenge for any of the championships as I expect, I wonder if there's any possibility that Montoya might get the boot before the end of the season and we'll see Webber drive the last few races for the BMW team? I'm thinking there's as little chance of that happening as Minardi taking Pole anytime soon but it might provide the only form of interest for the last few races of this season!

I don't see Jaguar beating Sauber. The Cosworth motor is proving very unreliable and we all know that the Sauber/Ferrari motor is reliable.

I just hope that the FW27 is better than the current FW26. I think I read somewhere that the FW26 has had no major developments since Maylasia. And that the same flaws in the FW26 are similar to the flaws of the FW25. Possible shake up at Williams???

An Aussie has just replaced Patrck Head as lead Engineer at Williams, so chnage is happening... whether it will mean results thsi year or next year who knows.

LOL im th eonly one that wants to see JV make a return.

My only concern with Weber going to Williams is who the other driver will be? If it aint JV then i would love it to be David Coulthard, both pics are fanciful, actually im more likely to get a drive, but i can always dream.

Seriously i think RS is a chance at staying at Williams, and woudlnt be a good teammate for Weber, and Williams have already said no to Scott Dixon as they want soemone with F1 experience... Alex Davison is a chance i suppose...who is the Williams test driver, wasnt it Zonta last year?

Williams test drivers are Gene and Pizzona. Last year when Gene replaced Ralf he was pretty quick. Pizonna... well we all know him for all the wrong reasons.

Not sure if RS is staying cause I read somewhere that Frank Williams doesn't want him anymore. Frank is known to be tight with his wallet and Ralf would have to take a significant pay cut. He's not delivering what Frank thought he could.

I'm willing to bet that Ralph has already signed with toyota, they are the only ones with a budget and something to prove.

williams have a history of racing up and coming drivers, not brothers who haven't shown their worth. Toyota have a big budget and need the best driver money can buy. Webber can't afford to risk his career on toyota but ralph may not have other options....

Dunno who the williams co-driver will be and I bet they are concerned too....maybe gene is in with a chance at last.

Isnt Fisichella's contract with Sauber up at the end of the year, he has had wraps on him in the past and is doing well in the championship (1 point behind RS). Wasnt Williams even looking at him before the Zanardi days?

As for RS leaving Williams, he would have to have rocks in his head, though his conduct and public comments about the team, well Williams doesnt suffer F1 egos, so most likely will egt the chop even if he does drop his asking price. Id be surprised if Toyota have bought him in light of his attitude and team disrupting antics, Toyota would surely have recognised it needs a driver to help build a team, not divide it.

Thinking about it, if Williams get Weber in the team (will have had 3 years F1 expereince), then i think Williams is more a chance of looking outside the current F1 crop of drivers, though the press has you believe that Williams have ruled this out

I doubt Fisi is going to Williams. It's known he's waiting for Schuey or Barachello to leave. Any Italian would relish the opportunity to drive a Ferrari. If Williams did sign him up it would be only a year contract.

Yeah Ralf isn't too good with PR for the team.

Not a lot thats news but Mark Webber whom I've always thought as being a bit too straight and boring personality wise has started to amuze me. Like his metaphor on him chosing a new team:

"At the end of the day, though, if you've got three or four supermodels lined up, you've got to make the choice. It's got to be the one with the best package but still looks good when she gets older. "

More from it here: http://www.foxsports.news.com.au/story/0,8...3-23770,00.html

It's really the first time I've heard him say that he wants out of Jaguar. We all knew it but he's always been so diplomatic about his contract with Jaguar etc. Another point of interest coming up is that traditionally Renault have used their home Grand Prix at Mangy Cours to announce their following years driver line-up. Could be one less piece of the puzzle taken out this weekend if as I expect they plan to keep their current driver line-up.

well Jag's been a great step in his career....at least there he has been paid for his work instead of having to buy a drive...there's no way his backers would have paid for another 2 years at minardi or jordan etc.

But.....goes to show I've got the wrong life....gotta love someone who can make an analogy from super models :)

Great analogy there!

Check this out

http://f1.racing-live.com/en/headlines/new...629091732.shtml

Someone wants Webber bad.

And then there's this

http://f1.racing-live.com/en/headlines/new...630090551.shtml

"I wish it was Budapest now"

Ouch! Jag's gotta hurt from that comment.

Forget what Patrick Head wants, I want David Coulthard to have a drive next year :P

Coulthard has already said he would only consider an offer from a top team.... so looks like i will have to find someone else to follow next seaswon :Oops:

It will be interesting if they throw Pizzonia in the 2nd car with RS injured or Gene. Apparently they are more impressed with Pizzonia to date, so have to wait and see this weekend.

Oh did you read in Auto Action that Brock is being considered for a seat at Bathurst with HRT or Kmart....sheesh the content of that mag may lack credibility :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My first car was a HG. I'm very familiar with them. A mild cam upgrade is a good idea. The 186 is a very flexible engine - meaning it has good torque from down low. You can give up a little torque down low for quite a lot more excitement in the mid range, and a bit more up top - but they are not exactly a rev monster. You need to upgrade valve springs at the minimum. For a bigger cam, you'd want to make sure it wasn't still running the original fibre cam gear. That would be unlikely, given that most of them shat themselves in the 70s and 80s, but still within the realms of possibility. Metal cam gear required. Carbies are a huge issue. The classic upgrade was always a Holley 350, which works, but is usually pretty bad for fuel consumption. The 186S had a 2 barrel Stromberg on it that was very similar to the one on the 253, and is a reasonable thing if you can find one, and find someone to help you get it set up (which is the same issue with setting up a 350 to work nice). The more classic upgrade was twin sidedraught CD type carbs, or triples of same, or triple Webers. The XU-1 triple Webers being the best example. You can still buy all this stuff new, I think, but it's a lot of coin to drop. And then the people able to set them up are getting fewer and further in between. There's still some, but it used to be everyone's** dad and uncle could do it. **Not everyone's! But a lot. All in all, I wouldn't get too carried away with the engine. Anything you do to it without a full rebuild for power and revs will only make it slightly faster. I am all in favour of a complete teardown rebuild, with nice rods and pistons, 10 or 1.5:1 compression, and a clean port job with at least a big enough cam to run 98 with that compression, if not bigger. And if I did that to a dirty old red motor, I'd want to inject it too, which I'd struggle to fight against the devil on my shoulder that would argue for ITBs and trumpets. But the bills would start to mount up, and it will still never make stupid power. OK, a few people still know how to build absolutely mental red motors, courtesy of the work that went into HQ racing and modern knowledge being applied. But even a 300HP red motor is no match for an RB20 with a TD06. So you have to decide what it's worth to you. I'd just put a set of 6>2>1 extractors, a 2.5" exhaust and an electronic ignition conversion/dizzy on it and just run the old girl like the fairly slow old girl that she really is.
    • Thank you so much for the comments.  This is very interesting and gives me some great ideas to think about. Keen to keep it simple and relatively classic looking. That said, i am not too worried about staying 100% period correct.  A little extra performance and relatively good (or improved) economy is just what i am looking for. Ill be keeping any parts i swap out so if i get nostalgic i can always swap it all back in.  Right now just trying to get some good ideas from people in the know (I still have a lot to learn in this space). Thank you again!  
    • Wrt the engine, you're very much limited by 'production quality' as to how much extra power you can extract from them (I'm talking i6 red-motor) -- a lot here depends on how 'authentic' or 'period correct' you want the modifications to be... ...I'm too old... <grin>...the first true performance engine Holden made, was in the HD/HR models ~ this was the 'X2' performance pack...it came with twin downdraft strombergs on an otherwise unimproved intake manifold, with a two piece exhaust manifold (reckoned to be as good as extractors)... ....these engines were built upon the '179HP' cylinder block, which included extra webbing in the casting to make it stronger and less susceptible to block distortion... The next performance i6 came out with the HK Monaro (also found it's way into the LJ GTR Torana ... the car I wish I hadn't sold)...it had pretty much the same manifold setup, but was built against the '186S' block...this block retained all the extra webbing of the 179HP block, but added a forged steel crankshaft (instead of the stock cast crankshaft), because it was possible to snap the crank... ...apart from the inherent weaknesses in the stock (cast crank) blocks, the next limiting factor is the cylinder head porting & combustion chamber design, and the actual valve sizes. Back in the day, you could buy a 'yella terra' cylinder head (from stage 1 to stage 5 gradients), and this was the way to get serious power out of them -- with the extra breathing of these heads, you could fit a triple SU or DCOE Weber setup... ...obviously, these mods were a waste of time on a stock cylinder head/camshaft grind. My housemate rebuilt the i6 in his VH dunnydore about 6 months back -- this is a 186S block with the 12port 2850 blue motor head and intake/exhaust manifolds, with a dual throat Weber off an XF Falcon mounted on an adapter plate ; it's not a bad makeup...got more torque & fuel economy just light-footing it about on the first throat, but stand on it and it makes more giddy-up than the standard 2850 blue motor that it replaced. Personal note: I'd just fit an RB30 and be done it it 馃槂  
    • Thanks for sharing. That's a great video! My buddy is doing the same thing on his build (S chassis struts and towers). He's building an S14 with billet RB30 shooting for 2000whp... a race car with a TH400 just like this video. For a road car I just couldn't go this route as the strut has to be almost vertical and the caster is not going to pivot correctly (let alone camber gain). You think the R32 frontend is bad, wait till you put a MacPherson strut on without modeling it all in Solidworks to check geometry. I'm not saying it's a bad way to do it but I'd be really curious to see how it affects the geometry.
    • Hey Christof and welcome!  Sounds like an awesome project! I'm not sure many of the regular users on here would know much about the HK but I could be wrong.  Looking forward to updates.
  • Create New...