Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I'm contemplating selling my evo, some say there car is "capable" of making 500kw, but it's on 240kw, all u need to do is spend another 30k to get there but it's "capable" , this is one of those evos that have made the power it's capable of, and a lot of money, and time has gone into this car, well over 80k not exaggerating... If I sit and count what the parts cost plus labour it would be over 100k... And it's got the best of the best gear in it.. Rarely get driven, the only thing left stock in this car is the 6 speed box and diffs, it has 9 months nsw rego. Less than 1500km ago, Engine has been refreshed with new bearings, gaskets, etc, head has been refreshed as well. New complete precision turbo set up, new brake pads, new clutch, new tyres... Spent over 25k in the last 3 months.. So here's the mod list

price is $46000

PICS ARE HERE

http://s1037.photobu...s?sort=3&page=1

Car was built by ChasersMotorworks in Melbourne if you want to know a bit more about the history feel free to call them.

Engine Modifications:

- HKS 2.3L forged stroker kit. - engine opened up and refreshed with new bearings, gaskets, etc 1500km ago

- Precision 6466 turbo with custom powertune manifold- 1500km ago

Turbo smart wastegate 1500km ago

M&w ignition 1500km ago

5bar map sensor

- HKS type R intercooler kit

- HKS type R oil cooler kit

- Id 2000 injectors

Big fuel setup and surge tank, braided fuel lines

- Tomei adj. cam gears

- Tomei Procam 270/270

- Hypertune Intake manifold

- Hypertune throttle body

- Tomei fuel rail, braided fuel lines

- Sard fuel regulator

- PWR 57mm radiator

- Ferrea oversize valves, guides, springs,

- Solid engine mounts

- Heavily ported, machined, polished head- 1500km ago

- Motec M800 ECU

- Tomei Sump baffle

- Solid lifters

Suspension/Handling Modifications:

- Ohlins Flag L coilover suspension w/external res

- Alcon monobloc 6piston 365mm front brakes

- Alcon monobloc 4piston rear brakes

- Rose jointed

- All aftermarket suspension arms

- Adjustable sway, camber, toe, castor, bump, rebound etc

- Summit tower brace

- Summit boot bracing

- In cabin floor bracing

- Under car bracing

Drivetrain modification:

- Cusco front and rear Differential LSD's

- ORC twin plate carbon clutch

- Rays RE30 10.5x18 wheels

Yokohama AO50 semi slick. 265/35/18 driven only 3 times with these new tyres

Eboost 2

Oil pressure and oil temp gauges

Evo 9 front and rear bars

Varis side skirt

Varis rear wheel arch to tuck in the 10.5 wheels. Otherwise they will be sticking out like dogs balls.. The car had a time attack body kit on it which I took off but had to leave this only for the wheels.

Body is in good condition. 1 dent on it on the door. Some scratches on the bottom lip.

Interior is standard trim

This car is nuts to drive, it comes on like a motorbike, and handles like it's on rails, and with the Alcon brakes, it stops as hard as it pulls! Well not really but I haven't tried yet.. lol..

It's tuned on e85 and made 515kw @ 40psi, can make more power with another fuel pump, but I think 515kw is more than enough on the street.. It was tuned at maatouks racing.

Car is located in burwood, nsw please call 0410158440

Price is $46,000 a bargain considering the amount of work, and money poured into this car.

PICS ARE HERE

http://s1037.photobu...s?sort=3&page=1

Edited by rami13b, Today, 10:38 PM.

post-86797-0-43163200-1386245479_thumb.jpgpost-86797-0-58918000-1386245490_thumb.jpgpost-86797-0-44387800-1386245501_thumb.jpgpost-86797-0-48020300-1386245520_thumb.jpg

No gt-r madness, you read wrong, my point is that there are people who advertise there car as "capable" of making 500kw plus.. This makes what it is capable of making, 100k has been spent on this car,

But if you think a turbo kit and stroker kit will get you 500kw think again, you will need another 30k.. That's what my point was..

Both links come back to this page.

Pics in duplicate thread here
http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/435995-2004-evo-8mr-with-515kw-at-the-wheels-100k-spent/

Edited by timmy_89

I didn't read it wrong... it's currently 240kw and the car had 100k worth of parts and labour.. and the standard Evo's have like early 200kw... I just find it hard to believe that's all...

Edited by GT-R Madness
  • Like 1

Yes you did read it wrong, I wrote...

" some say there car is "capable" of making 500kw, but it's on 240kw, all u need to do is spend another 30k to get there but it's "capable" , this is one of those evos that have made the power it's capable of"

Some say, as in, some people selling there evos claim that there 240kw is just moments away from 500kw, and in reality it needs another mortgage to achieve this power...

Then I wrote, THIS IS ONE OF THE EVOS THAT HAS MADE THE POWER ITS CAPABLE OF

Did you still not read it right?

post-86797-0-91840700-1386318840_thumb.jpg

^ and there's the proof , If this is still up in a few months and house hunting is finally done i will contact you :)

Edit : here is his photo's link for those not working

http://s1037.photobucket.com/user/rami_13bz/library/Mobile%20Uploads?sort=3&page=1

Yes you did read it wrong, I wrote...

" some say there car is "capable" of making 500kw, but it's on 240kw, all u need to do is spend another 30k to get there but it's "capable" , this is one of those evos that have made the power it's capable of"

Some say, as in, some people selling there evos claim that there 240kw is just moments away from 500kw, and in reality it needs another mortgage to achieve this power...

Then I wrote, THIS IS ONE OF THE EVOS THAT HAS MADE THE POWER ITS CAPABLE OF

Did you still not read it right?

attachicon.gifimage.jpg

I understand what you mean, but this was a very unclear way of saying it.

What makes it so difficult for people to understand, is you meant to write "their car", but what you actually wrote was "there car".

"There car" does not fit in the sentence, so people start wondering does he mean "their car", "the car" or "there car". If you do not use the right word it makes it difficult to decipher what you mean.

  • Like 2
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 months later...

Can I suggest rewrite the ad. I also initially read it wrong which made me laugh while reading. How many other people have read it incorrectly and moved on from your advert.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...