Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

2005 toyota corolla sportivo for sale,

142xxx kms

washed twice per week and waxed every 2,
serviced every 3-5k kms including gearbox oil,
has tein ss coilovers,
very quiet but noticeable exhaust.
used as a daily driver and for trips to albany,
i am second owner and have taken real good care.
has few niggly carpark dings,
steering wheel is wearing as most do.
clutch, waterpump, ac regas, sump reseal

and all fluids replaced

all been performed in the last 6 months
this is the *facelift* model of the corolla sportivos, kind of like a series 2 version, it has no recalls or problems that the previous had.

Very nice to drive, comfortable and fuel efficient.
you dont see many around anymore unfortunately,

price has been reduced dramatically for a quick sale,

unfortunately financial situations occur..

please dont call as i usually dont answer,
message jake for more info or enquiries!

0411305514

post-103623-0-39679500-1386682114_thumb.jpg

post-103623-0-29237900-1386682131_thumb.jpg

post-103623-0-41236900-1386682149_thumb.jpg

post-103623-0-55320600-1386682167_thumb.jpg

post-103623-0-07796400-1386682186_thumb.jpg

post-103623-0-17557800-1386682201_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/436203-wa-fs-2005-corolla-sportivo/
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Duh... to answer my own silly question, it's actually described in the FSM... ...400 pages away at the end of the manual, for RB25DE/DET signal descriptions, it cites the TPSwitch signal action, is dependent on the TPSensor value ~ this tends to infer the builtin POT voltage signal is the primary, and the switches are fallback/secondary should the POT fail/TPSensor signal lost (and switch alone with no TPSensor signal allows for base idle speed setting).... makes sense... they (TPS units) used to fail/wear the POT with time, they're not exactly built to last ~ having the switch as a redundancy gets around this...(or, it's less likely both signals would be lost as they're on different power rails)... and of course wrt RB26DETT, you have to electrically disconnect the IACV solenoid from the harness, to defeat idle air control...  
    • Dose is unaware just how much fun 145-150kw would be in a 2.5L NC MX5. It would be one of the most fun things to drive to ever grace SAU.
    • Same thought crossed my mind ~ depends on how one connotes 'stalling'...ie; gets a rough/stumbling idle as it get warm until it stalls... or... idles ok and simply falls-over when it gets to temp... ...you can test the whole circuit with a couple of resistors ...unplug coolant temp sensor, bridge terminals with a 2K7 resistor (ECU will do cold start), or with engine warm bridge with a 330R resistor (ECU will consider engine to be at normal operating temp)...it's a quick way to check wiring integrity/ECU response when you don't have a multimeter handy ...
    • They also make them with the motor mounted on the side 
    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
×
×
  • Create New...