Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Good questions Dr....

Quote:

Surely it's not just a matter of open / closed???

Wouldn't the amount the gate has to open be a cruital factor as it will need to flow varying volumes to maintain a set boost level across a certain RPM range??

The wastegate responds to boost pressure. The more boost pressure on the diaphragm and it's spring, the further the valve opens. Ignoring early opening for a minute. If your target boost is 1.5 bar, when it the actual boost gets to 1.51 bar, the valve should open a little tiny bit. Now we all know that doesn't happen, the boost goes up so fast it flies past 1.5 and the valves opens vary fast. If the valve is too big, it lets too much exhaust gas bypass the turbine, boost drops fast and the valve closes. Then boost climbs rapidly again because the valve is closed. Valve opens and the cycle starts again.

With the correctly sized wastegate with the exactly same spring rate, the valve will open just as far but it is smaller and so will bypass less exhaust. Thus it may not completely shut again. If it is correctly sized it should not have bypassed way too much exhaust gas, maybe only a little too much. So the valve just moves a little more open and closed to control the boost.

Secondly it's a lighter valve (remember a 35 mm valve head is 50% of the weight of a 50 mm valve head) so it has less inertia and can open and close faster.

Quote:

As for the varying 0,3 bar... could that not be caused due to a poorly setup or inappropriate boost controller?

Well that's what I thought, so I replaced the wastegate spring with one of the right rate for the target boost ie; no AVCR. Same result, fluctuating boost. So I used one of the Autospeed boost control systems (they always work for me), still with the right spring rate in the wastegate. Same result. So we changed the turbo to another with a slightly less aggressive compressor. Better, but not much.

It was at this stage I suspected the 60 mm wastegate was too big for 230 rwkw. But I couldn't convince the owner, he believed and was continually told by everyone he spoke to, that bigger was always better. So I recommended that the guys put on a smaller wastegate (35 mm) with the original turbo and not tell him. Bingo no boost fluctuations.

Oh, and it never lost 1 rwkw from the smaller wastegate, but it picked up a noticeable amount of response. This happened with another car (it had a heap more problems as well) and that's when I started thinking about a formula to pick up ridiculously (small or large) sized wastegates. Save a lot of time and money chasing other stuff.

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

do me do me.....  280rwkw @20psi

Yo BOOSTD, the formula was about empowering you, as the Skyline owner, not about me doing calcs for everyone. Oh OK, but just this once;

280 rwkw = ~450 bhp

450 bhp / 11 = 41 lbs of airflow = 41 mm wastegate

Now if you want to run 20 psi, then that's statistically the most likely sized wastegate.

I can't say as I've ever seen a 41 mm wastegate, so the choice is 40 mm or 45 mm. For good response, personally I would go with the 40 mm wastegate. The reasons are in the previous posts.

Hope that helps :)

much appreciated...I feel the empowerment now

for interest sake ATP turbo recommend a 38mm wastegate for this power level.

Pretty close, did they tell you why 38 mm? The brand of wastegate they suggested, did it have a 40 mm size?

No tricks, I am just trying to find out the background info to help my understanding. :)

some absolutely awesome info there SK, definately cleared the subject up for me totally (within reason)

at least now i know what the theory is in this decision while im out there shopping!!!

*imagines monkey typing while SK dictates from his recliner smoking a cigar*

Nah tried the monkey, types OK but butt ugly :thumbdwn: . I find the wench :boobs: much better.

Dictating from the recliner is OK, but I am not into cigars, I prefer a glass of red instead, :alcoholic

  • 4 months later...

Preferring to dig up an old post than to start a semi-redundant topic - if I was was to aim for in the 400-500hp @ flywheel rangewith an RB25DET, running 1-1.1bar with a T3/T04E with .7 turbine A/R, do you think around ~40mm external (8psi spring) would be sensible?

Cheers in advance :)

Preferring to dig up an old post than to start a semi-redundant topic - if I was was to aim for in the 400-500hp @ flywheel rangewith an RB25DET, running 1-1.1bar with a T3/T04E with .7 turbine A/R, do you think around ~40mm external (8psi spring) would be sensible?

Cheers in advance :)

500 bhp = 45 lbs per minute of airflow

45 lbs per minute of airflow= 45 mm

You are not going to get 500 bhp with 1.1 bar out of a RB25DET, I suspect something like 1.6 bar would be more like it

So 45 / 1.6 X 1.4 = 39.4 mm

A 40 mm wastegate would be OK

400 bhp = 36 lbs per minute of airflow

36 lbs per minute of airflow= 36 mm

I suspect something like 1.3 bar would be the boost required to make that power

So 36 / 1.3 X 1.4 = 38.8 mm

A 40 mm wastegate would be OK

As for the wastegate actuator spring rate, I wouldn't go below 12 psi as it gives much better boost control when the boost controller (whatever type) has less work to do, to fill the gap between the target boost and the spring rate.

You should check the compressor map for your turbo to make sure my guesses for power and boost are accurate. Hope that helps:cheers:

500 bhp = 45 lbs per minute of airflow

45 lbs per minute of airflow= 45 mm  

You are not going to get 500 bhp with 1.1 bar out of a RB25DET, I suspect something like 1.6 bar would be more like it

So 45 / 1.6 X 1.4 = 39.4 mm

A 40 mm wastegate would be OK

400 bhp = 36 lbs per minute of airflow

36 lbs per minute of airflow= 36 mm  

I suspect something like 1.3 bar would be the boost required to make that power

So 36 / 1.3 X 1.4 = 38.8 mm

A 40 mm wastegate would be OK

As for the wastegate actuator spring rate, I wouldn't go below 12 psi as it gives much better boost control when the boost controller (whatever type) has less work to do, to fill the gap between the target boost and the spring rate.

You should check the compressor map for your turbo to make sure my guesses for power and boost are accurate.  Hope that helps:cheers:

Thanks :)

Yeah I know 500hp won't be a number I'd see on 1.1bar :D ~1bar is a shorter term aim - but I'd like to set 500hp in my sights (turbo would be capable of it) so want to change as little as possible when I decide to raise boost levels.

Admittedly I wasn't sure if 8psi would be too low or not. Truth be told, the motivation for having such a broad power range etc, is I've actually been FORCED to buy a new turbo as my R33 one failed, and would like to move forward but will only really be able to get it running with FMIC, ECU and the turbo and wastegate as well as stock fuel system - so run it on low boost initially and gradually bump up the pressure as I get more supporting mods with 500hp as a an option if I decide I want to crack the motor open.

The concern I have is that the factory fuel system wouldn't be able to supply for 12psi on that kind of turbo, or do you think I'd be safe?

Yeah I know 500hp won't be a number I'd see on 1.1bar :D ~1bar is a shorter term aim - but I'd like to set 500hp in my sights (turbo would be capable of it) so want to change as little as possible when I decide to raise boost levels.  This is why I set such a broad power range....

Admittedly I wasn't sure if 8psi would be too low or not.  Truth be told, the motivation for having such a broad power range etc, is I've actually been FORCED to buy a new turbo as my R33 one failed, and would like to move forward but will only really be able to get it running with FMIC, ECU and the turbo and wastegate as well as stock fuel system - so run it on low boost initially and gradually bump up the pressure as I get more supporting mods with 500hp as a an option if I decide I want to crack the motor open.

The concern I have is that the factory fuel system wouldn't be able to supply for 12psi on that kind of turbo, or do you think I'd be safe?

OK Lithium, that fills in the gaps, it is always easier to make suggestions when you know the whole story. The 12 psi wastegate actuator spring may well be too high. You really should refer to your compressor map as it depends on the airflow that turbo develops at 12 psi. I have a number of T04E maps, what trim is the compressor? I have 40, 46, 50, 54, 57 and 60.

:)

The one I was looking at was a 50 trim - but I found out that its actually a Stone Mountain (aka. dodgey quality). I am on the look out at the moment, I spotted this for sale but suspect it might be a bit much - 60trim comp. on it....

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motors/C...on-18846258.htm

OOOHHHH SK do you have any maps that describe the HKS GT 3040 with .70AR and 1.12 exhaust??

im thinking they wouldn't be obtainable... but since this thread is back i thought id ask as my turbo system is going in very soon!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Initial/early bite is a feature of.....generic pads. Things that work cold. Just put Bendix Ultimate in it. If you don't like them, it's only $3.50 wasted and an hour to change them. I've been using Intima SR, and they seem to be a good performance pad. Street friendly and able to take at least a little beating.
    • This is my first post after registering.. I hope i can find useful resources on this forum. Great forum. 
    • As I implied in my post, I have NO idea what the were. But in case I didn't make it clear, the way they performed was brilliant; whatever the brand was. I think it was the compound that made the difference. And if they were Bendix, then sign me up, I want another set. I did drive down mount Ousley (just outside of the Gong) a few times, and they showed no untowards performance.   Its not the low dust that I am looking for NOW. At the time I needed low dust, but now I have no issues with dust but want the initial/early bite of the pads that were used. Yeah, the early cold squeal may of been due to a missing shim or such.  And to repeat, its not the low dust I am seeking, its the initial bite of the pads and increase in bite as  the warmed up during each breaking. As soon as I let off, I don't remember the breaks being extra sticky if I used them again soon after. But I also did not test that theory.   Thanks for the recommendation, But I would prefer to choose something specifically with the behaviour I described.   I assume that they didn't use the default compound off the shelf, as we discussed the dust issue at length. And the early squeal when cold, I have seen the sound is more of an issue with some pad compounds. Mostly ceramic, which also are said to produce less dust.
    • Well, in 2007 he must have been charging about $1800 an hour. He only looked at the car for 5 minutes. And another 4 to write the report wrong, and another minute to correct it. Mind you, this was for a car that was: Stock engine, fmic (hole in drivers guard), all alloy intake and custom air box, 3 inch turbo back exhaust, lowered, and a set of 17" Advans (255/40/17 rear and 235/45/17 front). It was nothing crazy. The blue slipper wanted the "hole in the guard" engineered. But that was because he got the shits that I wouldn't "relocate the battery from the boot, back to the factory position in the engine bay"... In an R33 GTST...     Also for emissions, E85, and don't go wild on timing. It's amazing how the closer you get ignition timing towards max torque, the last couple of degrees really throw NOx counts right up. And for the huge increase in emissions, it's only a small increase in torque.
    • He'll be looking down and swearing about "the damn apprentice" for trying to convince Duncan to use percussive maintenance... 😛  
×
×
  • Create New...