Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HKS actually use the OEM VQ25det manifolds in their old kit except for the crossover part of the manifold behind the engine so we know they will bolt on.

Everything else is pretty similar so I can't imagine why it wouldn't... except for the loom/ECu side of course

Edited by iamhe77

HKS actually use the OEM VQ25det manifolds in their old kit except for the crossover part of the manifold behind the engine so we know they will bolt on.

Everything else is pretty similar so I can't imagine why it wouldn't... except for the loom/ECu side of course

Yup, but HKS also have that weird flange adapter for the the turbo.

But also changing ECU means you have to go RWD manual though? Otherwise wouldn't you have the change the whole driveline?

Manifolds isn't the main issues. Yes, they bolt on, but the engine management side of things would be the biggest head ache.

Also sorting a turbo and wastegate to suit the 3500cc with the confined packaging.

Yup, but HKS also have that weird flange adapter for the the turbo.

But also changing ECU means you have to go RWD manual though? Otherwise wouldn't you have the change the whole driveline?

Change ECU and loom to the PNM35 items. I do not know if it has different connectors than the VQ25det for the speedo etc

Then just run a piggyback or get it flashed.

Change ECU and loom to the PNM35 items. I do not know if it has different connectors than the VQ25det for the speedo etc

Then just run a piggyback or get it flashed.

Change all the ecu's and all the looms. Don't like the sounds of that, too much work and headaches, and for what? The VQ25det is the better engine, unless you plan to drop 15k into the VQ35.

Change all the ecu's and all the looms. Don't like the sounds of that, too much work and headaches, and for what? The VQ25det is the better engine, unless you plan to drop 15k into the VQ35.

Sure, but the question was installing a VQ35 into an NM35 and using all the turboey bits

The turbine housing is way too small, and the manifold studs will need to be swapped around... And the gearbox won't bolt up, and the starter is in the wrong spot...

Then the cams won't work... and the real drama's begin.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You have just offended every teenage boy in America
    • Structured text and other high level PLC programing languages are not allowable in Functional Safety. They are very difficult to audit. My PLC stuff is almost exclusively oriented towards Burner Management Systems which are a particularly pernicious form of Safety Instrumented System, when implemented in an SPLC. Even the part of the code written to work in the non-safety logic part of the PLC, like with a Siemens S7-1500 series, still needs to be treated as if it was safety code, with access restrictions, code fingreprints and the like. And Allen Bradley can go EABODs. They ae full of shit. They have this whole lie going on where they say if you use a ControlLogix controller and its IO, and then just duplicate the IOs (ie, run in series or parallel depending on type, to try to make it "fail safe") and "use these programming styles and place these restrictions on what you do" that you can achieve SIL2. What a load of crap. They just get away with it because no-one in the US seems to understand the first thing about Functional Safety and carries on as if all they have to do is buy only SIL2 rated equipment and hey presto, it's a SIL2 system. Idiots. /rant
    • If you're really considering leaving it, a great question to ask is, is the magnet going to stick to the sump? The answer to the above is the same answer towards if I'd have any level of comfort leaving it... Personally, based on the cost of a motor if the magnet were to cause damage, I'd be fishing it out either way. Use the methods in here. It fit in through the plug hole, it'll come out.   PS, get a small actuatable claw for a bore scope. OR if you know a vet, they have really cool controllable scopes with hooks on the end. Supposedly they're like playing a video game. Ask if they can acquire you one of their scopes... Engine oil after all is just a different type of lube right? Will only make it easier on the next dog or cat...
    • All other (Boolean) logic functions though, are just built on those blocks above. Which does give you a lot of functionality in logic. It is basing that on using thresholds with analogue signals like GTS alluded to.   Not having things like timers will make it less useful for some of the ramp up logic you'd want, and again, on Haltecs capacity specifically, I'm not across anymore what you can / can't do with different tables.   I'm assuming, with your logic you want to implement, not only do you want your timing safeties, you're wanting to be able to derive the duty cycle for your solenoid, to maintain I'm assuming 175PSi? Or are you using a standalone WMI controller to maintain the DC correct, and you just want the Haltech working out which fuelling maps you should be on?
    • It doesn't seem to follow revs. Oddly it seems to follow TPS a little bit from what I can see, but with some delay a bit. IE end of the graph, when he lets off throttle fully, pressure drops a lot, then slowly builds back up, but rpm is on a nice cruisey drop off. I do agree though, it seems very electrically.
×
×
  • Create New...