Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I was recently told that it is common practice with some japanese high performance aftermarket exhausts including those intended for nissan gtr's to fit restrictors or stepdowns as they are called in the mufflers to obviously reduce noise levels. That will be achieved but unfortunately at the expense of flow capacity as is being found out when performance modifications are carried out on the engines. I will soon make available a rear muffler and resonator , both round , mild steel , 3.5" bore size at a reasonable price. I now have access to s.s. 3.5" perforated tubes which I imported. These mufflers will have a deeper , quieter sound and max flow. They are painted charcoal grey. I never intended to make shiny , look at me mufflers just something that does the job efficiently.

Mild steel will rust out in no time. Why not use stainless, the materials would cost bugger all extra, the main cost is in labour... And then I might actually be interested in buying some.

I'm interested to hear about the maximum size of mufflers that will fit under R32s and R33s . I had my R33 (GTST) measured recently and it has a Nismo Jasma I assume 3" cat back ATM . I wanted mufflers at least as large but I'm not sure anyone does a 5 x 10 x 16 for the mid one .

It's interesting that Kevin did an 18 x 7 round rear one because David Buschur in the US used a Magnaflow 14 x 7 round on his quiet "diff back" for Evo Lancers .

I was told a 6 x 11 x 20 oval would go in the back of my R33 though I'd rather try a 7 x 18-20 round if it can fit . If Kevin can do the same size as the middle Nizmo one - or better - I'd like two mufflers please . There is limited space between the upper side of the mid muffler and the tailshaft so it's a bit of a juggle .

One other thing is where the cats located . If it could be moved further forward a third resonator could possibly go where the cat was and quieten things down even further . I mention this because the Americans sometimes fit another muffler where the cat was and run catless which is risky on the street . They reckon a 6 x 14 Magnaflow round in the cats location makes a noticeable difference with the 7 x 14 round at the back .

Just yesterday I read a long thread on Evom.net about a bloke that wanted a factory standard sounding Evo with a 3' aftermarket exhaust . The closest he got was with a Dynomax VT , valve technology ? , muffler with a lightly spring loaded valve in the back of it . It worked well but the valve rattled badly at idle partically on engines with big cams in them .

Anyway quiet free flowing mufflers for Skylines in 3-3 1/2" would be great , cheers Adrian .

I think that 18x7 round was for me, could of fit a 20" long in there I rekon...

I'm gonna measure the biggest muffler that can fit under my 32 gtr and let Kevin know, might be interested in throwing another AES mid muffler under and see how quiet we can get it (even now everyone is amazed how quiet it is)

Mild steel will rust out in no time. Why not use stainless, the materials would cost bugger all extra, the main cost is in labour... And then I might actually be interested in buying some.

who told you that? My car has the same mild steel exhaust I bought it with 11 years ago

Mild steel will rust out in no time. Why not use stainless, the materials would cost bugger all extra, the main cost is in labour... And then I might actually be interested in buying some.

I custom built my own exhuast system from the 4inch dump pipe back into a 3.5 inch straight through into a magnaflow rear muffler. I chose to go mild steel as in total it would cost me $450 vs $750ish (including the muffler). The price difference i would personally say is not in the labour but the material.

Mild steel will last many years. My first car which was a 1994 toyota supra is still getting around with the same mild steel exhuast and that was almost 8 years ago, i bumped into the owner a few weeks ago.

I will ring Kevin in a few days because I'm curious to know if two of his larger mufflers can silence a 3 1/2 system on a GTS25T with a GT3076R . Dump to cat is already 3.5 just need the rest . By quiet I mean REAL quiet and no drone . Steel is fine too .

Cheers Adrian .

who told you that? My car has the same mild steel exhaust I bought it with 11 years ago

Coated I bet, they rust out from the inside anyway. Try fabricating a bare steel system without a coating on the inside and see how long it lasts. You would need to factor in the coating costs to compare them properly. E85 will limit it's life even more.

I don't need other people to tell me anything btw, I remove so many rusty shitty mild systems and replace them with my custom stainless, the piles of old pipes are leaving stains on my concrete. Do you want some? You are welcome to them.

Your choice at the end of the day, I hate seeing rusty shit under my car. I guess if your ride is devaluing to nothing then a few hunge is not worth wasting on it.

The rear muffler 3.5"bore, no stepdowns, for the gtr 32 I think can be 500 mm long and 7" diam. Flat spun ends are preferable rather than a cone version because the muffler contains more packer but a combination can be used if prefered. Not too sure yet about max resonator specs. It will be interesting to db the result. I expect it to be good. Even with a 3.5" exhaust it would be preferable to go to 4" from turbo to 3.5" resonator. The exhaust flow rate will increase by an unknown but reasonable amount. Could be better than expected. The dreaded drone can always be a problem with big systems on low , cruise mode. It is a bit of a lottery. Most times you win but sometimes not. Acoustics is a complicated science.Helmholz tubes can eliminate them. My stage 3 active exhaust kit destroys them.

Acoustics is a complicated science.Helmholz tubes can eliminate them. My stage 3 active exhaust kit destroys them.

Agreed.

The Japs love using Helmholtz chambers, and they work very well from my experiences with them, but they need to be tuned to the frequency you want to remove, which can add a fair amount of R+D to a custom exhaust.

I think the active exhaust is a much better option, especially if Vac actuated. Unfortunately no-one wants to spend that kind of coin, and good quality vac operated valves aren't cheap.

Here is my attempt, made from scratch.

post-63525-0-79277500-1395364396_thumb.jpg

The Stagea has a 3" straight through system with a regular oval mid muffler and a monster 18" x 13"x 12" rear can.

Uber quiet and no tricks. The rear of the Stagea gives you the room to go larger but the lesson is the same on the R33.....stick the biggest cans you can fit.

The Stagea has a 3" straight through system with a regular oval mid muffler and a monster 18" x 8" x 12" rear can.

Uber quiet and no tricks. The rear of the Stagea gives you the room to go larger but the lesson is the same on the R33.....stick the biggest cans you can fit.

Slight correction ^^

Someone above mentioned 500mm which is about 19.6" and that's about what can fit with a tightish radius bend into it . Depth wise will probably depend on how low your car is and how likely it is to get hit or torn off . Somewhere around the 7-7.5" is probably about it height wise and maybe 11" wide . Stageas obviously have long range tank space for the rear can ...

A .

I can supply rear muffler 3.5" bore , 7" diam. 500 mm long almost flat spun ends or with exit coned end , mild steel, externally tigged , 409 s.s. perforated tube with expansion joint to prevent fatigue , quiet deeper sound, $400. Same specs but 3" bore $380. Don't have dimensions for resonator yet. It will be something like 5" diam and 400 mm long.There will be power robbing stepdowns. This package will work well. If 500 mm long proves to be a difficult to fit I will come back to 480 mm. Time will tell.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing. Especially at idle, changing the cam angle by that much could be spewing more fuel out the exhaust courtesy of everything happening that bit later. More fuel also means more air (if the fuel didn't burn, then neither did the O2) and so the O2 sensors can start to tell interesting but misleading stories. And the specifics of what is happening could easily be affected by everything else you changed as well. And it could be dynamic, where a few revs more or less could somewhat change how the engine is breathing.
    • Good idea on the temp probe. The mv readings of the O2 sensors are very similar to one another, as is the injector pw. I went through logs in the past to see if there was a discrepancy and there is. Because they alternate up and down as narrowbands do.. they do often 'switch' as to which one is more. They were never 20%+ (more like 1-2%) so it's possible the difference between 20 and 15-17% is a similar discrepancy to 2.0% and 1.7% which I wouldn't have really noticed in the past. We did think about spacing the strut brace. Unfortunately the ~20mm that the GTR brace is lower than the GTT brace is effectively what you need to clear the vents. Moving it up would make it very uncomfortable, but it's plausible that 10mm is a unhappy medium between both hard places... The good news is.. using MR HAMMER it was actually pretty easy to bend back the bent bits to make sure the guard and headlight/new headlight tabs line up right. Yes, we used a R34 GTR guard to make sure the bolt holes all lined up with a known straight guard. As above, you can see the side skirt and the GTR guard are not meant to play together, but everyone seems to think this is a simple fix to the point where nobody who has had these talk to one another mentions how... ...so I'll just assume they know how to fix it when it comes to paint jail time again. Whoever they are. Nobody returns my calls. There's so much changed with regard to the ECU and the car.. that the next step really is to connect the scanner and attempt to drive the thing. It'll be pretty clear pretty fast how in or out everything actually is...
    • That's nasty! I think there is perhaps an inherent problem is using elastomers in such environments. The whole thing can and will get quite hot, and elastomers are not famous for their temperature resistance. On top of that, if the components are cast rubber or urethane and so on, there might be QA/QC problems with bubbles or voids in the material that could critically change their performance. They might just tear apart after being squished (presuming that any elastomers are used in compression rather than tension, I'm thinking that you squeeze one with a void in it and it tears the wall of the void to the outer edge of block, then the next time it extends or otherwise twists, it just gives up). This is all purely hypothetical, but it makes me wonder if the things that they have put into it to make it nice to use/live with are perhaps going to cause occasional failures like this. I wouldn't be getting up in arms over it, unless there are many repeats. I have personally ruined an Xtreme clutch - just an HD thing. I can't remember if it was still behind the 20 or was after the 25 went in. But it inverted some of the retaining spring/clip things around the outside. No-one could explain it. It wasn't thrashed, there wasn't heaps of torque being put through it, and there were no obvious problems other than the above. They were quite concerned by the event so they replaced it even though it was a few years old, which was very nice of them. As far as I am concerned, these things happen with clutches.
    • Any damage to the box/input shaft?
    • Hey there Mate , I just got my local guy to install it Waterhouse Performance, Penrith (specialise Nissan/Datsun and other performance cars) , you can do it yourself if you like , AMS has instructions on their website.  Cheers Pac
×
×
  • Create New...