Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...

To Ash and the promise of meat :-)

to MS crew, any idea of what other dates are options with Sandown 16th Aug TBC, reason asking, just confirming non of the options would fall on the SAU kart Rnd#2 weekend b4 I sign up to it.

Was good to get to my first SAU track day (other than the nats years ago) & see what it's all about. Had a great day. Looking forward to the 16th at sandown! Thanks ash for the steaks & skewers.

I'm OS for two weeks in August. Going to miss next round at Sandown, but i'm not really sure what going on there in any case? Was PI a round? and what about that 3 track challenge thingy?

Can't say I was really happy with the PI WRX day, wet weather, then an hour of touring and passenger laps, then lunch, then porsche on its roof, meant I got a total of 11 full laps, 1.5 laps at any actual speed. The itch certainly didn't get scratched :(

We entering Sandown 16th August - email mentioned 20 places left, though site shows 95?

http://www.wrx.com.au/event-899288

It was mentioned, apparently it's only WRX club at this stage - I'll get onto the MS guys about advertising it
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...