Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I've searched and i can't seem to find what i'm after, so i thought i'd ask.

I was looking at buying a RB26DETT to put into my R34 GTT, But after looking around and talking with people. I've been swayed into looking at 26/30 builds. Only downside to this is i have no idea about them, the benefits or what is needed to build one/cost of it all?

If someone could explain the benefits of doing this and rough list of parts/costing. Not chasing huge power at the moment but down the track that will be the goal.

Cheers in advice

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/
Share on other sites

Use the NEO head.

NVCS Yo!

Really? From what i've been reading most people go against using the NEO head? All in favor of the 26 :O!

and way better comp comp ratio with stock pistons.

op, you have a lot of reading to figure out what you want.

I know there is alot of research left to do, but i can't seem to find any kind of basic guide/build threads out there i can see that would help me to a point. I'd say i'm aiming for around the 300-350 rwkw mark, being that the egine won't be in the car for awhile i'll have change to change mind and forge internals if i want to go down that path. Just need a push in the right direction to get the ball rolling

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7170735
Share on other sites

Have you tried the search function or Google?

Here is the guide (in the very first pinned thread in the RB30 section):http://stevenwelsh.site.net.au/RB30_DOHC.pdf

and the third pinned thread in the RB30 guide is the RB30/26 guide.

Then at the top of the forced induction section you can see results including what was done for RB30/25 and RB30/26

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7170769
Share on other sites

Why dont you work your original engine for your power goal?

Keeps the car legal, im sure your local police may not be too happy finding out its a RB30 with a 26 head in a GTT.

For the power your chasing its not worth the effort, use what you already have.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7170772
Share on other sites

Have you tried the search function or Google?

Here is the guide (in the very first pinned thread in the RB30 section):http://stevenwelsh.site.net.au/RB30_DOHC.pdf

and the third pinned thread in the RB30 guide is the RB30/26 guide.

Then at the top of the forced induction section you can see results including what was done for RB30/25 and RB30/26

I did try the search function, As i said. But thank you for being a smartarse and linking me the page and telling me other places to look.

Why dont you work your original engine for your power goal?

Keeps the car legal, im sure your local police may not be too happy finding out its a RB30 with a 26 head in a GTT.

For the power your chasing its not worth the effort, use what you already have.

Its Tasmania, We don't have defect stations ever ;) I figure i will want more power down the track its just a starting point, unless you can push the same amount of big power out of a 25neo as a 30/26

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7170805
Share on other sites

It doesn't cost a huge amount more to build a 30 as opposed to anything else, it's mainly sourcing the new stuff that's different and the machining that adds up. You end up adding a whole heap of extra stuff as you go.

My engine (which is still not finished) would have cost me $15000 I'd reckon. A lot of that has been upgrades that you would do on any performance build though- new dumps, new clutch, all new genuine hoses, new timing belt tensioners, etc, etc. The list is never ending!

No disrespect intended but I would learn a bit more about your car first before committing to a 30 build. Spend money on upgrades that can be transferred over to the 30 once you build it (turbo, injectors, fuel pump etc). Once you're used to that power then go the next step. Totally my opinion but it's your money!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7171224
Share on other sites

^ agreed 100%. You always end up spending money here/there.

IMO as others have said, stick with the 2.5ltr for now... Make your 300-350rwkw on it. Put decent suspension, brakes and so on into it and learn how to drive it.

While in the process of learning how to drive it with 300-350rwkw, build that 3ltr bottom end while you wait for it to pop (which will likely come eventually). All the engine ancillary parts will transfer with regard to injectors/ECU and so on if you think and plan ahead.

The ONLY thing would be to buy say a GT3076 for now so that it is not too laggy, once you have a 3ltr then put a larger turbo on there. You're only talking ~$1000 extra expenditure but if you get 1-2 years outta the 2.5ltr and so on, then you've had 1-2 years of a really bloody decent set-up with great all round performance and good power as opposed to putting a big turbo on first and it being laggy and you end up hating it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7172265
Share on other sites

and everything is stock i built it stock rb30 200+ks engine and if u use a rb25 s2 head rips make a oil line for it on ebay like 80$

AND it cost 1000 $ to build rb25det oil pump, bearing set ,pistons and rings rb30et and head gasket and arp head bolts

Edited by r32_rb30det
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7173325
Share on other sites

in my 12 years experience, my opinion now days is f**k it.. get a good stock motor and put quality supporting mods on it and quality tuning with e85 and make good strong reliable power.

ive built motor and blown them up, due to the silly little things that can go wrong, so financially im better off running an OEM motor with mods.

my car is proof of that, stock RB30 with 26 head, all supporting mods. 412 rwkw on 22 psi and it gets thrashed...HARD

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7173332
Share on other sites

in my 12 years experience, my opinion now days is f**k it.. get a good stock motor and put quality supporting mods on it and quality tuning with e85 and make good strong reliable power.

ive built motor and blown them up, due to the silly little things that can go wrong, so financially im better off running an OEM motor with mods.

my car is proof of that, stock RB30 with 26 head, all supporting mods. 412 rwkw on 22 psi and it gets thrashed...HARD

The only downside to E85 tune would be the lack of places that sell it close by to me. As far as i'm aware the closest place to me is 2-3hours away. So for now anything i do will be 98 pump tune. So you also think i should stick with the 25det neo and just support mods on that? The engine sits standard at the moment with just shy of 160XXX Kms on it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7173867
Share on other sites

The only downside to E85 tune would be the lack of places that sell it close by to me. As far as i'm aware the closest place to me is 2-3hours away. So for now anything i do will be 98 pump tune. So you also think i should stick with the 25det neo and just support mods on that? The engine sits standard at the moment with just shy of 160XXX Kms on it.

Yep get a Nistune or Link, bigger turbo, injectors, afm if necessary, fmic, fuel pump, exhaust and a good tune. If you want an RB30 later you can transfer the head and all the other bits.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7173907
Share on other sites

in my 12 years experience, my opinion now days is f**k it.. get a good stock motor and put quality supporting mods on it and quality tuning with e85 and make good strong reliable power.

ive built motor and blown them up, due to the silly little things that can go wrong, so financially im better off running an OEM motor with mods.

my car is proof of that, stock RB30 with 26 head, all supporting mods. 412 rwkw on 22 psi and it gets thrashed...HARD

thats the way some as me stock as a rock rb30 limiter bashing hard

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437616-rb2630-help/#findComment-7175114
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... it's not just "de-oxygenating". If you do that you just have, most likely, ethane. So you still need to do a synthesis step to combine a number of ethanes/ethanols to make circa-8-chain hydrocarbons. And of course you don't want straight chain HCs, because n-octane actually has a negative octane rating (ie, it's worse even than the n-heptane which sets the zero on the octane scale!), so you have to do some tricky catalytic chemistry to synthesise branched HCs. That's all doable - but it doesn't come for free. And.... it starts with ethanol, which is an agricultural product, and there will almost certainly never be enough of that as a base stock to replace the liquid fuels that are in use. You really wouldn't want to be planning to be using any more ethanol for fuels than is currently already used (in E10, E85s, etc). And ideally you'd be looking to reduce such usage, as it is largely wasteful, particularly in the stupid-ole'US-of-A where the corn lobby has organised it so that it's actually primary production corn that is used to make a lot of the ethanol, not by-products and waste, like it is (mostly) elsewhere. So, what I said about needing free-ish energy probably still applies. True synth fuels would be made from H2 and CO2, in a near reversal of the combustion process. In fact, given that the H2 would be split from water first, it actually is a complete reversal of the combustion process. But...energy intensive. The human race burns something like 1 cubic MILE of crude oil, after it has been made into various fuels. Every year. That's a simply stupendous amount of energy. Just assume that the density is 900 kg/m3, and that the calorific value is 45 MJ/kg, then that is 165.9 x10^12 MJ of energy. Or more than 10^19 Joules. You get a maximum of 1 kJ/s per square meter solar radiation falling on the planet's surface, and so if you halve that for daylight, and halve it again for average weather (highly optimistic) and then take ~25% for the very best efficiency of solar panels, then you need about 85.7 billion square metres of solar panels to generate enough electricity to replace that liquid fuel energy consumption. Each panel is about 1m2. That's a rather large number of panels. We also burn about a cubic mile of coal. We also use hydroelectric power. We also use nuclear. We also use a number of other sources, both "renewable" and not. You can kind of ignore the renewable ones (except for hydro, because it will all end up getting subsumed into pumped hydro for storing other renewables, and so it won't be the standalone renewable that it originally was), so we end up needing a multiple of the ground area number that I just arrived at.
    • Corvette thread then? Don't say I didn't predict the future again. "I love the little MX5, I do, but I just want something a little easier to get in/out of, a little more cushy and some power would be nice - I miss the V8 Rumble... I found this clean red C5 for sale recently and..." I'll do you a great deal on the next step, which is one of those but you can fit people in it, too.
    • What about renewable diesel and/or gasoline? I see some projects spinning up like de-oxygenating ethanol to make drop-in compatible bio-gasoline especially in CA. I still think the future is EVs and we should've all gone full throttle on nuclear power after the 1973 oil crisis like France. Despite 15 years of work in CA to reduce the CO2 intensity of generation with renewables our electric grid is still far worse than even "low carbon" nuclear power. ICE is pretty cool when you aren't depending on the stupid thing to be practical and reliable and cheap as possible to get you to work every day. It's kind of like mechanical watches or vacuum tube amps.
    • I just rolled over "my" first 10k km in the MX5 Every time I go anywhere it always ends up in a adventure to look at houses and find some random country roads I've been on leave since early November but unfortunately need to go back to work on 19 January Luckily though I still have a fair chunk of leave left to burn until.... Not that I'm counting 😁
    • These look like S13 wheels.  And Welcome! 
×
×
  • Create New...