Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I realise this question is generic , but how many of you guys tune your cars with a lambda sensor fitter to the tail pipe . I had one recently fitted on a track day and noticed the the more laps i did the leaner the car got , once the car cooled down mixtures were back at their targets . Upon further questions to people i found that the cheaper units arent very accurate especially when they get hot and usually read leaner than the mixture . I thought that this way of measuring mixtures would be the best however am i wrong? or are the good lambda meters ie motec , worth their weight in gold?

adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43791-lambda-sensor-question/
Share on other sites

Im not sure if its the meter so much as the sensor. The meter is just a graphic representation of the voltage produced by the sensor. There is an ideal operating temperature for the sensors as most wont operate until 300deg. The new four and five wire sensors have the ability to heat themselves, but there is still a max operating temperature. I know some people with the LM-1 use something like a heatsink to keep the temps from going too high. Its just a piece of copper plating drilled in the center for the sensor to go through.

Mr Bean is spot on, that is why there are $100 lambda sensors, $400 lambda sensors and $1K+ lambda sensors. We have $1K+ lambda sensors fitted as close to the turbo as we can get, that way we get fast response to changes. The long travel though the exhaust pipe slows down the results and you have to wait a few seconds after every change to see the result of the tuning change. Those few seconds can be dangerous if you are pushing the envelope. Plus if the lambda sensor is too close to the exhaust outlet you can get distorted readings as some atmosphere sneaks in.

Unfortunately this is one case where you definitely get what you pay for. :P

I agree with you SK regarding the distorted reading especially on idle as the car fluctuates between 14.7 and 16 depending on how much wind their is . The lambda sensor i use is valued at a little over 1k but is a few years old now and i fear is just not accurate enough .

ac

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • LOL.... fk...   there goes 25K to make 200kW
    • For sure the later RB26 variants had a different setup (6 cam voltage sender?), but the RB25DE/DET share the same ECU pinout/PCB footprint, and at the ECU plug it ends up being 'throttle sensor in' & 'throttle sensor out' (to A/T TCU) ...you stick a multimeter on these pins and you'll find them directly connected (0 ohms) ; I had an pair of Nissan ECUs on the bench long ago, and I noticed this throttle sensor in/out link, actually linked to an op-amp ...which was unpopulated on the NA board, but present on the T board and I went 'ah-ha!' in some moment of clarity... ...it wouldn't surprise me if they changed strategy here though (in the software and actual monitoring of this signal), because they did with other stuff (A/T signals).. and 0.45v as a trigger point makes sense, as that's what the external TCU units expect at idle ; kudos, thanks for that insight...I suppose it boils down to whether or not Consult can display real time data of that signal's voltage... ...in any event, it presents the same target...ie; rotate TPS unit to achieve 0.45v to suit both ECU&TCU, and where do you goto from there? Just disconnect TPSwitch connector and/or that plus TPSensor connector....or do you go for the throat and disconnect IACV solenoid and see if it still stalls? (probably throws a recoverable fault code and goes for default idle strategy?)...
    • I’m also conscious that e85 is slowly being phased out. Not all United’s have them anymore. Can’t take the risk of being low on petrol and assuming the servo will have it. 
    • MR HAMMER has said his piece. Painted up to avoid Rusty Rusty. Actually lines up well. (i.e it lines up the same as the unmolested GTR guard). Turns out the GTR Strut brace does foul on the bonnet vents ever so slightly. May need a little bendy bendy if intended to keep using with a strut brace. So spacing it out to clear the FAST102 is not an option. Annoyingly, the bonnet vents also foul on the heater lines running over the engine. Given this engine does not EVER require a heater, a delete loop is going to be used. Don't worry, the defogger uses the AC. The heater is basically "Do not use the aircon and turn the fan on". It will still be effective, I promise.... once I get the system regassed... Will have to revisit with unvented bonnet I suppose, and suitable strut brace. There's plans to do this and other things tonight and bleed brakes (there was a weep) and put the bumper back on, and take Good Friday morning - Because troubleshooting on the side of the road limping it home at midnight tonight is ... not very smart.
×
×
  • Create New...