Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU 3rd Annual Putty Road Cruise and Lunchon, Sunday 4/7/04


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 350
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  Quote
Got a bit of vignetting there Adrian, what camera / lens were you using?

Most of the pics were taken with a wide converter fitted to the front of my sony DSC-F505.

I didn't think I screwed it on properley :-(

Most of my photos are flukes anyway.

Adrian

yes, that one! cause it was an ACCIDENT that he gone into the corner too fast on the wrong side of the road, he should of gone in infront of me instead he gone for one more car infront of me then realises that the corner is just there. so he needed to merge right into the left side of the road. This is better than proceeding the corner on the WRONG side of the road! He did indicate and avoided an accident with the car he pissed off! I really didn't see the silver r33 gave him the space to move in!

He's not a member yet he came along cause he wants to have some fun with us, purely come along to make friends and socialise, it wasn't too pleasant one of our member had a go at him! why swear at people like that?

If he was driving like a dickhead, good on whoever it was from SAU who had words to him.

There are many other "import" based clubs with reputations for driving like half wits, SAU isnt one of them and we'd all like to keep it that way. Anyone driving in a manor thats deemed unacceptable on any SAU cruise/event will be spoken to and warned if not told to leave.

That "ricer" car looks like the car formerly known as GTSPEC or something similar from Victoria.

What a ricer, nice paint, nice wheels, nice interior and some quality engine mods to go with it :uhh:

wohhhhh.... NO, he was not driving like a DICKHEAD! man. why do you fink so?

beside, warning someone doesn't need abusive language? and were you at this cruise? if so, you knew the speed the front was at right? in order for us to keep up, it was mission impossible...*cough*

the yellow skyline was full going for it... some people behave, some don't, i don't understand why SAU is the way it is by the way you are putting it! and we were 100% in it for a sensible cruise. were you?

Can you read? it doesnt look like it.

The operative word being if. I wasnt at this cruise, but if he was indeed driving like an idiot then I would stand behind anyone who had words to him.




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The steering wheel on my 97 s3 gtr is a little bit worn out, so im on the hunt for something mint. I notice that this type of steering wheel is on several other nissan's of the era.  Does anyone know if their all identical, or are there slight differences? I feel like gtr tax applies to anyone selling one, but if it comes from any other car the price is much less, even though its the same design.  Chat gpt says the material for the gtr is slightly different and it says gtr on the wheel, but every pic ive seen it just says nissan. 
    • I might have to say it.
    • Ahh... it's an early RE5R01A box, that means the pinouts I gave are wrong (they were for the RE4R01A 4-speed box)... I'll have to dig around in my docs to see if I've got that schematic (they used the same gearbox plug, with the vacant pin wired to the direct drive clutch solenoid)...prolly hidden away in a supplement somewhere... ...there were 3 variants of the RE5R01A ~ this early schema was what we called the 'dumb' 5 speed ; it's what jatco called a 'medium duty' box, with torque holding up roughly ~200ft/lbs or so, which was good for NA from RB20/25DE and up to around VG30 output spec. With the RB25DET (and VG33/35 mills), the only options they had was the 4-speed 4AX00 box, which had been beefed up to handle the extra torque (primarily for the VG35, but it also suited the RB25DET mill and others)...and the RE4R03 box in large 4WDs a lot of the time... ...the next variant of 5-speed was redesigned, stronger, and 'smart'...first ones had external TCU with internal (on valvebody) Shift Control Unit, pressure switches, and 2 x TSS...and the last ones had internal TCU+SCU setup, with CANbus control etc etc. @DRoc81 On the RHS of the box towards the rear, there should be a stamped silver ID tag -- what's the model number? Oh...and with the early 5-speeds, the torque converter control solenoid assembly should be replaced as well (31940-60X00)...it's a bit Murphy's Law ....if one has failed, bet on the rest not being far behind ...
    • I remembered wrong, but was close though 1Kz setting because those Jaycar SSRs don't go any faster, 1x pump per SSR with flyback diodes & heatsinks. In saying that, the heatsinks are overkill. Just on an alloy plate is more than sufficient. You'll find without a flyback diode, your SSRs will heat up big time and also die prematurely.  I've been running the two same SSRs since the last motor, no issues, car does 2 hour straight drives in summer once in a while and gets punished on the track. Nothing melts, no hot messes, etc.    
    • Hmm. You're probably best off working out what the lobe centreline or even the LSA is for the stock cams, with VCT OFF. That's bound to be out there somewhere. Then, work on the assumption that the Kelford centreline is probably the same, and wouldn't be more than a couple of degrees away, if it is different at all. I'm very surprised that you needed to adjust the exhaust cam by 5° to get it on spec. That screams there's another problem somewhere. Anything from the belt being 1 tooth off (how many degrees is one tooth worth?) to simple user/measurement error on the degree wheel. I say this because Kelford, like most quality cam manufacturers these days, does a pretty good job of actually making the cams to spec, not relying on patching it up afterwards like we had to do back in the 80s.
×
×
  • Create New...