Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys that HKS GTRS is really just a GT2871R with a 52 trim compressor . Comes on song at 3700 on an SR20 ? My US SR contacts claim the larger HKS GT3037 52T spools at 25-2700 rpm and would easily out gun a GTRS . The 3037's are using the T25/28 flanged .73 ARR HKS GT30 exhaust housing and usually the RNN14 GTiR exhaust manifold .

That GT3071R at the GCG site is not the same as the one from ATP turbo in this string . The only way to make it work properly is with the HKS GT30 style exhaust housings . All the ones using GT28 exhaust housings are dogs - wrong type of turbine housing for the turbine .

Cheers A .

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Those who have interest in the gt30 rb or vg hybrid.

There's a thread floating around where some one had a vg30 turbine housing machined up to suit their gcg highflow. If I remember correctly they went from 240 something rwkw to 270 something rwkw.

I plan to do similiar using a GT30 700177-7 CHRA and .6 Comp cover machined up in to the VG30DET/R34 turbine housing.

Hopefully push 18-20psi through it.

Or... there is also the GT30 700177-14 CHRA that runs the larger comp wheel. The only issue with this is I am unsure if there is a .6 comp cover available for it. I really don't want to run a .7 due to clearance issues.

Edited by Cubes

Why is choosing a turbo so hard?? ;)

I don't know a lot on turbo figures and everyone has something different to say - GCG say the turbo would be good for an RB25DET with RB25 turbine housing.

- discopotato who seems to know his stuff doesn't suggest it as a good combination

- My tuner can't see anything wrong with the GT3071R and can get me a good price including the flanges and adaptors and everything

lol it's all too hard.... *confused*

Now that we know someone has made 250kw @ wheels with a GT3071R on an RB20DET (other thread) with full boost by 4000rpm, we can agree that the GT3071R is a good unit?

I have a VG30DET housing, this can be machined out to fit the GT30 turbine wheel happily enough - and the GT3071R comes with a .5a/r TO4E compressor housing.... shouldn't this combination be able to fit down low easier than the GT30R low mount described in that other thread, and provide some awesome performance for an RB25DET?

It sounds like the GT3071R-WG (w/ cut down turbine) was a good combo for the RB20DET.

well, I currently am running a GT30r with a VG30 housing machined to fit.

Currently running 200rwkw at 7psi, lol. Still waiting FOR MY f**kEN INJECTORS.

lol anyway, I Will be sure to let you know how this goes.

The comp Cover is a .7

On an SR20 what boost are they most efficient at? about 1.1 bar or more?

The GT-RS is a little high for my liking. If you could strap one to an un-opened motor and get a safe 220rwkw at max efficiency or close to it, I think they would be an awesome option for street use.

Hmm I'm starting to look more into a GCG Hi-flow now..

I just want my 250rwkws dammit!! :)

dude,

the garrett GT3071R (external w/gate version) will flow enough air to make 250rwkw happily.

the comp wheel itself can flow up to ~450bhp, and the turbine is the 60mm GT30 wheel which flows ~500bhp easily.

the GT3071R with A/R .82 on an RB25DEt would be a killer combination IMHO.

good luck anyway.

I just took off 3071 internal gate turbo from my r32 gtst as it was shit... couldn't control boost kept going in excess of 22psi. Made good power up high 254 at 8250rpm. Dog under 4000rpm and only exciting from 5000rpm.

External gate on rb25 would be ok, internal gate - forget it. Rb20 forget it.

hows it feel on 7psi? N/A like? :rolleyes:

lol actually, the car is much punchier down low with this turbo, as it must be able to breathe easier because the turbine isn't creating as much resistance being a ball bearing.

and I said, 7psi = about 200rwkw... Its definately not N\A like... With a good launch, chirps all the way through second :)

I just took off 3071 internal gate turbo from my r32 gtst as it was shit...  couldn't control boost kept going in excess of 22psi.  Made good power up high 254 at 8250rpm.  Dog under 4000rpm and only exciting from 5000rpm.

External gate on rb25 would be ok, internal gate - forget it.  Rb20 forget it.

I'm running an internal gate. No problems here.. With the wastegate completely open, it makes a max of 3psi boost.

Edited by The Mafia

Mafia,

I found the same thing, upon fitting the larger turbo it has free'd up the bottom end, feels freeier and tends to free rev quiker also.

More off the line let the clutch out torque. :rolleyes:

What I meant by N/A like, so its not linear then? lags a little then hits solid and pulls?

What I meant by N/A like, so its not linear then? lags a little then hits solid and pulls?

Team america - f**k YEAH

hehe

yeah pulls harder off boost, but then catches boost and starts chirping in second lol

so yeah, hit boost and starts going like your mum - an animal

(hehehe jokes)

I wouldn't say its like na at all

Roy - I'd misread the full boost thing.... though he did say 14psi by 4000rpm, which is pretty decent spool, no? This is bearing in mind that RB20DETs don't spool turbos overly well, and need a few revs to go - I'd imagine (as Quincy said...) that one should go very nicely on an RB25DET.

Mafia - Do you know if there were any modifications to the VG30 wastegate port to allow it to hold boost like that? Are you using a Garrett supplied actuator with it?

I'd say you hit the nail on the head Cubes , if a turbine side is causing a major restriction uncorking it pays off . It makes me wonder if the small turbine and housing combination had some emissions benefit - sort of heat and a little forced EGR .

Notice how at times larger ARR turbine housings pull the cork out and unleashes a few ponies with no change to the compressor or cover . I guess it comes down to how well the sysyem was designed in the first place and its aims .

The combination I always wanted to see on an RB20 was the 25 exhaust housing on an otherwise std turbo , how much gained compared to how much lost . At least it should all fit and look standard .

The GT3071R (-23 CHRA) is biased toward exhaust flow turbine wise so may not need big housings to make it work depending on the desired state of tune and engine size .

Roy - I'd misread the full boost thing.... though he did say 14psi by 4000rpm, which is pretty decent spool, no?  This is bearing in mind that RB20DETs don't spool turbos overly well, and need a few revs to go - I'd imagine (as Quincy said...) that one should go very nicely on an RB25DET.

Mafia - Do you know if there were any modifications to the VG30 wastegate port to allow it to hold boost like that?  Are you using a Garrett supplied actuator with it?

no modifications what so ever to the waste gate port. And I am running the garret actuator with it.

No problems. With the gate fully open, the most boost it will make is 4psi, max.

I've got a GT30R To go on a RB20 and I am abit worred it is going to be to big and laggy???.

Specs are .7 front cover 58mm wheel and rear housing 0.63 56mm wheel.

Dont know why i was sold such a big front cover? and it is internerly gated,

Any one got any idear when it would come on boost and what have other people got on there RB20's, what kind of power will it make-230 or so on 1 bar?

It would be great if any one could help me out, Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...