Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

man I've been eyeing up this turbo for my SR for a few months now. This is the first lot of info I have gotten of people in OZ.

Hope all goes well BOOSTD can't wait to see the results. IMO you should have a look at the GT30R available at ATP mated with the HKS GT30 0.73A/R exh, should be well suited to a 2.5/2.6 like the RB.

Some more info i have found from some forums about this turbo( This is on a evo 2l though):

"Hi guys-- Here's my take on the ATP 3071, fwiw. It does indeed spool up just like the 3037 (also .63)/custom tubular manifold set up I had on our One Lap car. However, it does this with a *stock cat* and not the test pipe that I run. All things equal, I suspect it to have 700-8000rpm spool up advantage to the GT3037 which is really quite good. Also, on our dyno, boost lag tends to be exaggerated due to the way the engine loads up. Well, not really exaggerated... but it comes close to representing the boost lag you feel on the street when you load it up in 3rd gear. If tested with a much slower ramp-up rate (simulating the first 5 or so seconds of a Dynojet pull where the big rollers are slowly getting up to speed), boost response with drop by another 400-600rpm which is where I suspect ATP is getting their sloop up claims. As such, their claim is perfectly valid and the difference in spool up that we are seeing is based mostly on differences in testing methods. Nothing to create a controversy about, IMHO To give you an idea of how different loads and different gears can effect spool up, look at this: In 4th gear, lugging from a low RPM, the big GT35 on my car can reach 20psi by 4500rpm. In 3rd, it takes until just under 5000rpm. In 2nd, it takes until past 5500rpm. So spool up numbers, by themselves, don't explain the whole picture-- especially when dealing with bigger turbos."

some more from ATP... I will not be installing this turbo anymore as my car has been written off.

Hello Matt,

The 3071R without the Exhaust housing is $1075.

We've seen the HKS housings up close and no they are not

better in any way. However, they do make housings that

are with unique A/R's that can fill in the gaps better in

certain applications and they also make T25 flanged

housings with 4 bolt discharge and external wastegate use.

The only other thing to know on the .73 A/R vT25 flanged

HKS housing with a 4 bolt discharge, the extra notch on

the inside has to be machined out in order to clear the

turbine wheel heatshroud on 3071R.

Thanks!

ATP

  • 5 months later...

More info in. 3071R on an Audi 1.8ltr. 426hp at all four wheels!!!! Check out the dyno. spoolup looks sensational. The rumours I have heard are this turbo mirrors the new HKS GT RS at a fraction of the cost

check it out

http://www.atpturbo.com/root/releases/rele...lease050304.htm

11.97 quarter mile and trap speeds of 121mph. backs up the power claims IMHO

That figure of 426hp was with a GT28RS and ATP's own custom exhaust housing . The particular housing is a hybrid , it looks like a 5 bolt Garrett on the outside but internally its more like a GT30 style . It also used an external waste gate , a lot of effort was expended to make the EXHAUST side wok well . I wonder what Enthalpy from Honda-Tech.com thought when he read this ..........................

I think the GT-RS is a bit too small for the CA18, its more suited to a SR20

if your saying GTRS is too small for a 1.8 litre, how is it going to be more suited to 2litre?

GTRS is an awesome turbo even for an RB25, capable of 250rwkw at only 1bar, with loads of average power.

if your saying GTRS is too small for a 1.8 litre, how is it going to be more suited to 2litre?

GTRS is an awesome turbo even for an RB25, capable of 250rwkw at only 1bar, with loads of average power.

What I mean is, the GTRS reaches >1bar at approx 3700rpm on an SR20. So for a CA18, its gonna be a tad over 4000rpm I would say. Thats kinda pushing it for a street car, which would already be gutless off boost with a CA18, wouldnt you say?

The GTRS looks great on a RB25 tho!

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 9 months later...
presa i have been thinking about bolting one onto VG housing but as discopotato suggests get the 60mm turbine not the cropped 56mm.

I was looking at the GCG unit - Click Here

Would anyone know if this could bolt up with little hassles?

Or would additional adaptors and oils lines ect. need to be made?

i was speaking to Tarek at Racepace about the GT3071R with 60mm turbine. he didn't know it existed (best i can figure) till i emailed him the old garrett catalog this turbo comes externally gated (ie same as a GT30R with a 71mm compressor vs 76mm compressor). he was going to get back to me but theoretically it should be no problem to shoehorn it into a VG housing. how well it would work is something i couldn't answer, presumably quite well.

i think the GCG GT3071R is the internally gated version with the smaller turbine (56mm).

discopotato has written a few posts on the cons of the cropped 56mm turbine if you have a look around.

anyway good luck with your choice.

Edited by wolverine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...