Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nope Racespec your wrong , go and have a look at the old Garrett Cataloge PDF . Cartridge or CHRA no is 700177-23 . Its also shown in the new cataloge (turbobygarrett) BUT only in the comparison sheet . Its the third of the three GT3071R types listed as 420 , 425 and 450 Hp . This is a generic cartridge that you option housing kits for if it comes from Garrett . ATP will sell a complete unit with optional housings .

No one has offered it yet but there's nothing to stop you using the comp cover off the GT2871R 56 T which is .60 ARR T04B .

700177-13 is GT30 turbine + 76mm 60Trim T04S compressor .

700177-14 is GT30 turbine + 82mm 56 Trim GT40 compressor .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've got a GT30R To go on a RB20 and I am abit worred it is going to be to big and laggy???.

Specs are .7 front cover 58mm wheel and rear housing 0.63 56mm wheel.

Dont know why i was sold such a big front cover? and it is internerly gated,

Any one got any idear when it would come on boost and what have other people got on there RB20's, what kind of power will it make-230 or so on 1 bar?

It would be great if any one could help me out, Thanks

Wolverine

The unit you are refferring to is either

CHRA 700177-13 GT3076RL

Compressor

60 Trim

59.03mm

CHRA 700177-14 GT3082RL

Compressor

56 Trim

61.36mm

Thanks

Tarek

RACESPEC

hi tarek

that pdf i sent you a few weeks ago has the GT3071R version that disco is referring.

No problems. With the gate fully open, the most boost it will make is 4psi, max.

dude,

that's no good. if you're making boost with the gate completely open, then there is a restriction on your exhaust side, maybe the VG30 exhaust housing doesn't flow all that well when matched with the GT30 turbine.

what should I look at to correct this? Maybe drop the cat for an initial test?

Maybe the wastegate hole isn't big enough?

Mafia,

having a look at the exhaust system first off would be a good option as this area has been found to restrict engine power and turbo gas flow.

if this doesn't help, then maybe look at the wastegate exit area on the turbine housing.

Hiya all,

Got a Stagea RB25DET with Attessa 4wd system.

Currently got 141kw at the 4 wheels, currently upgrading intercooler, entire fuel system, and afm at the moment. Im after around 200kw at the 4wheels.

Opinions on GT30 turbos for the RB25... which would be best, for a heavy wagon which is used for the family car, as such. Either a full rebuild of my standard R33 series 2 turbo, with full GT30 internals, from ATS for $2100 in liue of the GCG rebuild, or the GT3071R as per spec below......

Opinions? Thanks heaps ppl's, Brendan

(ps - this turbos are on ebay for $1700aus)

GT3071R (84T) with internal wastegate 430-450 hp

Turbine:

-56.5mm w/ 84 trim

Housing:

-0.64 or 0.86 a/r (GT28 inlet and outlet flange)

-Internally Wastegated (No Actuator)

-T3 5 bolt discharge 0.63 and 0.82 A/r available shortly Email us for ETA

Compressor:

-Wheel: 71mm w/ 56 trim (GT30)

Housing:

-.50 a/r TO4E

-Inlet: 2.75"

Do us a favour and email them for the ETA on the internal gate .82 a/r???? ;)

The seller is on ebay, known as "Roguepi" located in Sydney....

I thought it was an intresting price at $1699 plus delivery, brand new, and there are 4 different spec options at that price.

But wondering if I'd be better off rebuilding my 'spare' series 2 R33 turbo upto GT30 spec for an extra $400. (Spare as in I got jipped by a forum member stating that it was a R34 Neo turbo - bugga, big bugga!)

Brendan

  • 1 month later...

i am waiting hear some thoughts about the "ultimate wastegates" from a turbo dealer that has ordered one.

cubes, are you sure a GT3071R would only get going at 4500rpm?? i would have banked on them being a pretty neat match with ok response.

Doesnt get going until 4500rpm on a rb25det.

Looks interesting, I wonder how it really flows :S

http://www.atpturbo.com/root/releases/release103105.htm

Hmm interesting indeed. But lit looks as if the tapering may introduced some turbulence in the wastegate gases?

Edited by Busky2k

there will be turbulence for sure, perhaps not dissimilar to a combined dump. however for simplicity if there is no substantial drop in performance (granted there is some loss) this might be a neat and easy solution.

does anyone know exactly the cost to performance of combined vs split dumps?

Hello All

JUST SOME UPDATED NEWS for you all

1.

I have ordered the ULTIMATE WASTEGATE, to have a look at it, they have been behind in production, its been sent, should have by the end of the week

This actually only suits the ATP housings that they have cast up

2.

T3 Internally Gated Turbine Housings SHOULD be available in MAY

3.

I have a BRAND NEW VG30 Turbine Housing being cast up here in SA, ready for production late JANUARY

Thanks

Tarek

RACESPEC

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...