Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I removed my front upper control arms but not 100% certain how they sit back in the car...if I look at fitting the left arm first, I think the cotter pin sits on the inside of the strut with the small nut facing down, is this correct?

Also, do I fit them as pictured where the pin mounts are offset or do I spin the unit on its thread axis 180 degrees so that the pin mounts are aligned to the each on the face side?

post-8728-0-72208400-1392614983_thumb.jpg

I think you will find comparing them against the stock arms most instructive. The alignment (or offset) needs to look the same. Per this http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/tamiya_S2000/1992%20Skyline%20GTS-t/d5da7a6a.jpg

As to which end goes inwards...I dunno. I can't remember if the lengths of the inner bush and outer bush are the same, which would be one key way to determine which end is which. The other way to look at it is.....the cotter isn't used to lock them up for length is it? In which case, it simply might not matter where it goes. Provided you can unlock the nuts and spin the centre, it should work equally well either way - also provided the ends are parallel and the offsets are equal (which I think they probably are - it's been a while since I've handled an R32 upper.). If you need to access the cotter, put it where it is easiest to get to.

Edited by GTSBoy

Both the bolts for the front uca are different diameters. Larger diameter bolt is the inner. Inner bushes are slightly longer too. That should tell you what way they fit.

Edited by H4x

Thanks for the info guys, they are the first version arms. Do they bend on the GTR as well? This is obviously concerning...

Here comes the something I cannot explain. I have reinstalled the factory upper arms which measure approx 175mm centre to centre from the pivot holes (versus the uas arms which measure approx 155mm centre to centre) yet with the factory arms camber is huge as the top of the rims sit about 10mm furtherinside the guard!?

Edited by Marko R1

Here's mine. Its about 165mm center to center, which was for 3deg neg camber at about 635 ride height (too low, one of the reasons its apart atm)

gallery_15274_3064_39520.jpg

Oh and as the series 1 arms are clearly not "fit for purpose" Pelican should swap you to series 2 for no cost!

Re: the length - urrr.... remeasure?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Interesting. Some of them were tight to lol
    • That's right, simple but works. Run out of load? Rescale the table lol. Want to be lazy and not rescale? Drag the K
    • @DraftySquash @Duncan he's not talking about the part that sits against the radiator support, he’s talking about the lip that sits towards the front outside of the car. anyway I had a look at other cooling panels and came across this one https://justjap.com/products/carbing-radiator-cooling-panel-plate-nissan-skyline-r34-gt-t?variant=37829684134087&currency=AUD&utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=Advanced feed&utm_content=Carbing Radiator Cooling Panel Plate fits Nissan Skyline R34 GT-T (Coupe)&srsltid=AfmBOoonzPDKqe9NgKi5U0AkFc2XvbXETGmNWvfNcyBT5DUZagMYHg9DZ70 if you take notice it’s the same shape.  well thankfully the justjap listing has a description and it says : - Nissan Skyline R34 GT-T Coupe (M/T -07/2000) this means it’s specifically for a s2. S2’s have different front bars to s1 so that lip with the 3 holes are *probably* mounting points for the s2 bar. im not 100% sure but im almost certain it will still fit a s1 bar       
    • Everyone is too used to learning from places like HPA "how to tune" and what to expect at what point, rather than being able to see "The computer says I'm in cell with Row = 8, column =4, and I can see my fuel is lean, so lets add more" Everyone wants "real units", which helps for someone picking it up for the first time and seeing how bad the tune is if they're not used to touching it.   However, I think for most of us who want to play with it, you're 100% right, we're only needing to learn about it for OUR CAR. Which makes it great, and we don't need to care what the real values are, we just need to know which cell it is, that's causing the lean or rich point, or that we want more ignition timing or less. But again, everyone wants everything super you beaut and nearly self tuning, with VE maps, and a billion compensations...   Though then there's me over here when I'm doing reverse engineering work just reading data in hex format that most people couldn't work anything out from. Yet I can see what's going on.
×
×
  • Create New...