Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

damn turbos biting me in the arse AGAIN!

back story: car ran mint for two full days at ADGP sydney, no issues at all. put on trailer and towed back home (turbo intake bagged, like i always do)

yesterday (2 weeks of sitting around in shed) i started it up and brought it up to temp then moved car out to do some work, shut it down and noticed a bad noise... wasnt there before.

heres the vid

the worst part about it is this is Garrett number 4 for me now....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/439625-dead-turbo-vid-inside/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

well it isnt, feed is fine, oil supply is fine, oil pressure is fine, have datalogs from hours of track time with no surge.

lately ive been having a lot of drama's with Garrett turbos.. I had a GT3076 which died out of the blue, so i bought a brand new GTX3076 from MTQ here in Adelaide and this lasted a month. the turbo out of the blue developed a whistle and then seized quickly after. MTQ and Garrett could not determine the cause and denied warranty.

So anyway i then purchased a GT3582R new, cheap as i reused housings off my GTX, this has lasted the longest and now after competing FAULTLESSLY for 2 days at ADGP Round 3 at Sydney a few weeks ago i then put it on trailer, drove back to Adelaide (intake was bagged as i always have for years when towing interstate) and placed in my shed. I started it back up yesterday to move it out the shed and when shutting it off i heard this noise.

Im a bit lost to why Garretts keep Failing me, its not oil feed, oil control or temp problems, i have data logs and evidence to back this up. the engine has been the same one since day 1.

many factory turbo set ups dont run inline filters... its not the be all and end all solution.

MTQ found no evidence of oil supply or contamination on my GTX turbo they simply could not determine the cause

Oil is usually around the 15w 40 SN rated for e85, oil temps dont really go much over 110-120

EMAP is ex mani abs press.

Unless it was also you that I'm thinking of, there was a recent (like sometime in the last 6 months or so) on exactly this topic and my faint memory of it is that it had to come back to some sort of interruption or inadequacy of the oil feed for this to occur.

hey mate, remember we came and saw you when my GTX died at Calder ADGP round.

send me a pm with what you can do with my current turbo.. keep in mind i dont want any change in specs really.

I can have your dead turbocharger rebuilt. and see if mine last much longer : )

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...