Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have inserted the acronym GAFU into my Mech Eng List Of Terms dictionary :(

Back on topic - Dean, I'll find out tonight/tomorrow about the Garrett wastegate actuator (cost, part no: etc).

Ram in more pressure than the stock injecotrs can handle and the spray pattern of the injector gets all ***ed up and all the injectors spray pattern wont be the same.

You didnt see this happen in perth did ya??? coz perth seem to always get the most stupid figures out of stock parts which dont seem possible :D

makes more sense having the engine failing due to ***ed up spray patterns rather then staying open(running rich)

If you are going to port and polish the intake, why don't you go the whole hog and get it Extrude polished or whatever they call it.

Get your throttle body, inntake manifold, runners and head and take it to them. They then pump the stuff full of this "Gunk" which is abrasive and smooths the path in the direction which the air will flow.

I think its about $330 to do it....

BASS OUT

Hi guys, ok thanks for the responses.

I think they have high levels of Nitrous in the air down in perth, lucky bastards :D

SK: U mentioned a place to get Rb25 injectors, can u tell me pls?

Matt: Thanks for the info on the w.a. I agree the rb20 wont suffice.

Steve: Hmm is 040 a better fit, otherwise i might get some prices of jap brand pumps.

At current, I am speaking to Bill from ATS in regards to hiflowing the stock turbo, and see what options i have. Will be lookin at min of 250rwks.

Will there be any difference between a decent EBC and the PFC EBC in performance. I assume that the PFC will work better with the EBC it was designed with?

Thanks for all ur responses guys :D

I just finished an exam, so in a happy mood :rofl:

Cya

Will there be any difference between a decent EBC and the PFC EBC in performance. I assume that the PFC will work better with the EBC it was designed with?

For more comprehensive ecu data-logging.

if you want the engine to last using the stock injectors at 260rwkw is not the way to go about, full stop.

:werd:

-rb25

Steve, thanks ill keep that in mind, cmon currency rate, go aussie dollar :D

Leo: Read this thread by BOOSTD, http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ht=%24350+turbo

I am basically goin to do the same thing but with a different V-trim, and different machining, which is still to be decieded. Ill let u know once i myself know. Shoudnt cost more then 600 for the turbo work, and that is probably worst case senario.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...